{
  "type": "article",
  "title": "Carney Calls for AI Diversification After Washington Pulls Anthropic Models Worldwide, Decentralized AI Tokens Surge",
  "summary": "After a US order forced Anthropic to take its two most advanced AI models offline globally, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney urged the world to stop leaning on a few American providers, while tokens tied to decentralized AI rallied to a $24.3 billion market cap.",
  "content": "Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney used a stop in Ireland on Sunday to flag a wider danger he sees in the AI economy: depending on a small group of American companies. His warning landed just after a US government order knocked two of Anthropic's most advanced models offline for users around the world.\n\nSpeaking ahead of the G7 summit in France, Carney said, \"The situation we're in collectively right now with Mythos and Fable is something that can happen with overreliance on certain models,\" TrendKia reported.\n\nWhy One Option Is a Risk\nCarney was careful to say that nobody had \"done anything wrong in the situation.\" The real error, he argued, would be to \"just accept this, don't take the lesson, don't build out and diversify.\"\n\n\"It is never a good idea to have one option,\" the prime minister added, framing concentrated reliance as a weakness in itself.\n\nWhat the Order Did\nHis comments followed a Friday directive that told Anthropic to cut off access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for any foreign national, whether inside or outside the United States, citing national security grounds.\n\nAnthropic complied at once, disabling both systems for every customer. The company pushed back on the reasoning, though, pointing out that the jailbreak cited in the order can already be reproduced on public models such as OpenAI's GPT-5.5.\n\nCommerce Secretary Howard Lutnick reportedly sent the letter to Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei. The move was said to be driven partly by suspicion that a China-linked group had gained access to Mythos, according to TrendKia.\n\nThe clash comes as Anthropic closes in on a $1 trillion valuation, with annualized revenue topping $47 billion. TrendKia has reached out to Anthropic for comment and will update this article if the company responds.\n\nCentralized AI as a Single Point of Failure\nThe prime minister's worry casts centralized AI as a single point of failure, where one company obeying a single government order can sever access for users everywhere at the same instant.\n\nCentralized AI keeps the model and its controls inside one firm. Decentralized AI splits those functions across independent operators that a blockchain coordinates.\n\nDecentralized AI Tokens Climb\nProjects built around decentralized AI rallied after the ban on Anthropic's models. According to data from CoinGecko, the sector's market cap stood at $24.3 billion, up 6% on the day and 12% over the week.\n\nSmaller compute and data networks set the pace. ChainOpera AI, io.net, Grass, and NOVA each rose more than 30% over the past week, while NEAR Protocol and Bittensor, two of the sector's biggest tokens by market cap, gained 15.9% and 27.9% on the week respectively.\n\nDoes Decentralization Actually Fix It\nWashington's action against Anthropic points to \"a risk that is largely unique to centralized AI,\" Dan Dadybayo, strategy lead at Horizontal Systems, told TrendKia. Echoing Carney, he said leaning on a handful of US providers \"creates genuine systemic risk, similar to what we saw in finance in 2008.\"\n\nSpreading models across independent nodes removes the single \"kill switch,\" Dadybayo explained, but the danger does not vanish if the compute behind those models stays bunched among a few suppliers.\n\nThe shift is being pushed along by \"rising compute and data costs,\" said Peter Anthony, founder and CEO of Perceptron Network, in comments to TrendKia. Anthropic's predicament, he added, \"didn't create that problem, it just made it impossible to look away from.\"\n\nAnthony agreed with Carney that the order exposed a \"strategic vulnerability,\" but he questioned whether decentralization truly solves it or merely \"just pushes the chokepoint back one layer to GPU suppliers.\" If decentralized AI still runs on chips owned by a few cloud giants, he said, \"you've rebranded the risk, not removed it.\"\n\nWhat this means for you\nWhat this means for you:\n\n• For AI users: A single government order can take tools like Fable 5 and Mythos 5 offline worldwide overnight, so avoid building your work around just one AI model.\n• For crypto investors: Decentralized AI tokens such as NEAR Protocol and Bittensor jumped sharply over the week, but rallies driven by political news like this tend to be volatile and risky.\n\nQuestions & Answers\n\n1. Which Anthropic models did the US government order offline?\nFriday's directive told Anthropic to cut off access to its Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models for any foreign national, citing national security grounds.\n\n2. What did Mark Carney warn about?\nHe warned that overreliance on a few models and US providers is risky, saying it is never a good idea to have only one option.\n\n3. How much did decentralized AI tokens rise?\nPer CoinGecko, the sector's market cap reached $24.3 billion, up 6% on the day and 12% over the week.\n\n4. How did Anthropic respond to the order?\nIt complied immediately and disabled both models, but disputed the basis, noting the cited jailbreak can already be reproduced on public models like OpenAI's GPT-5.5.",
  "url": "https://trendkia.com/en/ai/anthropic-para-ameriki-pabndi-ke-bada-kanada-ke-pm-karni-ki-chetavani-gine-chune-1083",
  "category": "AI",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-15",
  "tags": [
    "Anthropic ban",
    "Mark Carney",
    "Decentralized AI tokens",
    "Fable 5 Mythos 5",
    "US AI policy",
    "NEAR Protocol Bittensor",
    "AI diversification"
  ],
  "language": "en",
  "site": "TrendKia"
}