# Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian Denounces US and Israel at UN General Assembly > Addressing the 81st UN General Assembly, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian rejected terrorism labels, highlighted civilian casualties from airstrikes, and condemned threats of military force. **Type:** article · **Category:** America · **Published:** 2026-09-24 · **Source:** TrendKia **Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/america/snyukta-rashtra-mahasabha-men-garaje-irani-rashtrapati-masoud-pezeshkian-america-aura-israel-para-lagae-gnbhira-aropa-37954 · **Language:** English **Tags:** Masoud Pezeshkian, UNGA, Iran, United States, Israel, Donald Trump, International Relations Addressing world leaders in New York, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian delivered a forceful address during the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly. He strongly challenged Western narratives, maintaining that Tehran is not a sponsor of terror but rather a sustained victim of external aggression and terrorism. Emphasizing national sovereignty, he explained that enhancing defensive capabilities is essential for national security, noting that while his administration remains open to dialogue, it rejects any diplomatic engagement driven by coercion or threats. ## Damage to Civilian Infrastructure and Sports Facilities Detailing the physical toll on his nation, the Iranian leader described extensive damage inflicted on essential civilian facilities, including hospitals, bridges, higher education centers, and schools. He pointed to a specific incident at a sports hall in Lamerd, a facility frequented by local youth and children for extracurricular activities, which suffered heavy strikes. Pezeshkian stated that these operations were conducted using American and Israeli munitions, arguing that nations that train and finance armed militants paradoxically level terrorism accusations against Tehran while it merely exercises legitimate self-defense. ## Photographic Evidence and Cluster Munitions Claims During his remarks before the assembly, Pezeshkian presented photographs depicting former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei alongside schoolchildren from Minab in southern Iran who lost their lives in coordinated strikes. He brought attention to the humanitarian cost of the conflict, asserting that cluster bombs deployed by foreign forces in Lamerd directly struck and endangered children residing in the area. ## Two Centuries of Non-Aggression and Nuclear Rights Reflecting on the geopolitical posture of the Islamic Republic, Pezeshkian maintained that conflicts have repeatedly been forced upon his people, yet the country will never waver in safeguarding its borders. He stressed that Iran has not launched an unprovoked invasion or assault against any sovereign nation for the past 200 years. Defending their technological initiatives, he reaffirmed that his country will firmly retain its fundamental right to pursue and utilize nuclear energy exclusively for peaceful, civil applications. ## Criticism of Maritime Blockades and Rhetoric Turning his focus toward rhetoric from Washington, Pezeshkian criticized the recent General Assembly address by US President Donald Trump, noting that its reliance on military ultimatums proves Washington remains entrenched in intimidation tactics. He warned that aerial bombardments and aggression cannot eliminate a nation's resolve. Furthermore, he accused American authorities of attempting to shut down vital maritime passages crucial for civilian supply transport in an effort to impose unilateral control over the region. ## What this means for you Heightened rhetoric at the United Nations signals continued diplomatic friction and regional volatility across the Middle East. - **Global Energy Prices:** Friction over strategic shipping lanes could disrupt commercial transit and fuel supplies. This uncertainty often leads to sharp fluctuations in crude oil and transport costs globally. - **Diplomatic Negotiations:** Strong posturing from both sides risks delaying substantive talks regarding regional security and nuclear oversight. Stalled diplomacy may prolong economic sanctions and border tensions. - **Maritime Shipping and Trade:** Increased scrutiny and disputes over waterways may cause freight operators to alter shipping routes. These route changes usually translate into higher transport expenses and supply chain delays. - **Expatriate Security in the Gulf:** Geopolitical standoffs across regional transit corridors raise security concerns for international personnel living in nearby zones. However, daily operations and civic life are expected to remain steady absent direct conflict. ## Why this happened A longstanding geopolitical conflict, persistent military strikes, and retaliatory rhetoric framed the confrontation at the United Nations. - **Response to Civilian Casualties:** The Iranian leadership utilized the podium to highlight fatal incidents and property damage in towns such as Lamerd and Minab. They attributed these casualties directly to foreign munitions and coordinated operations. - **Rebuttal to American Ultimatums:** In direct response to the address delivered by US President Donald Trump, Tehran sought to counter coercive rhetoric with a show of resistance. The speech aimed to project strength while rejecting unilateral diplomatic pressure. - **Defense of Nuclear Development:** Amid international scrutiny and economic sanctions, Iran used the global assembly to assert its entitlement to peaceful atomic technology. The leadership emphasized two centuries of non-aggression to counter international terror accusations. ## Questions & Answers ### 1. What core message did Masoud Pezeshkian deliver at the UN? He maintained that Iran has been a victim of terrorism and remains open to talks, while firmly rejecting coercion and intimidation. ### 2. Which specific locations did the Iranian President cite? He highlighted strikes on a sports facility in Lamerd and civilian casualties among schoolchildren in Minab. ### 3. What historical claim did he make regarding Iran's military record? Pezeshkian stated that Iran has not initiated an attack or invaded any sovereign nation in the past 200 years. ### 4. How did he respond to Donald Trump's address? He remarked that Trump's speech relied on the language of force, demonstrating that Washington continues to pursue a path of intimidation. --- _TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._