# US and Iran Hold Three-Hour Indirect Talks in New York Following Trump Warning

> High-level representatives from the United States and Iran engaged in three hours of mediated discussions in New York, following Donald Trump's warning of severe consequences.

**Type:** article · **Category:** America · **Published:** 2026-09-23 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/america/new-york-men-tina-ghnte-taka-chala-america-aura-iran-ka-kutanitika-snvada-trump-ki-sakhta-chetavani-ke-bada-samane-ain-sharten-36833 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Donald Trump, Iran, United States, Abbas Araghchi, Strait of Hormuz, Steve Witkoff, UNGA, Jared Kushner

Diplomatic channels between Washington and Tehran saw sudden and intense activity in New York as representatives from both nations held nearly three hours of discussions during the United Nations General Assembly. This engagement occurred shortly after US President Donald Trump issued a stern public warning threatening to completely destroy the Islamic Republic if both sides failed to secure a formal agreement. Despite the aggressive public posture, officials engaged behind closed doors through intermediaries rather than direct face-to-face negotiations.

## High-Level Representatives Convene in New York
The delegation representing American interests included Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff alongside Jared Kushner. On the Iranian side, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi led the representation. Following the session, US envoy Steve Witkoff confirmed that mediated talks with the Iranian delegation took place over several hours on the sidelines of the UN assembly. Witkoff characterized the dialogue as constructive and encouraging, signaling that diplomatic communication remains viable despite escalating rhetoric.

> 

## Trump Evaluates Meeting Following Bilateral Talks
Speaking during a bilateral meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Donald Trump directly addressed the diplomatic exchange, noting that discussions between American and Iranian interlocutors spanned roughly three hours and turned out to be very good. Trump revealed that another meeting between the two sides is scheduled to take place soon. Describing the strategic crossroads, Trump stated that Iran currently faces two distinct paths: pursuing a comprehensive agreement or confronting extremely grave consequences.

## Tehran Sets Terms on Reopening the Strait of Hormuz
Iranian state media acknowledged the diplomatic contact between Abbas Araghchi and the US delegation, noting that the session was arranged following a formal request from Witkoff. During these exchanges, Tehran explicitly outlined the specific preconditions required before considering the reopening of the vital maritime corridor through the Strait of Hormuz.

Tehran's demands center on three key points: an immediate lifting of the US naval blockade, the unfreezing and release of Iranian assets held abroad, and a definitive halt to ongoing military hostilities across the broader region. Iranian officials maintained that should Washington meet these stipulated criteria, commercial maritime transit through the Strait of Hormuz could be restored for international shipping vessels.

## United Nations Address Outlines Nuclear Redlines
The closed-door diplomacy followed an uncompromising speech delivered by Donald Trump at the United Nations General Assembly. In that address, Trump framed the bilateral standoff around two stark alternatives: concluding a viable pact that allows Iran to progress economically, or launching severe punitive action against the country.

Trump reaffirmed Washington's absolute stance that Iran will never be permitted to acquire nuclear weapons under any circumstances. However, he simultaneously preserved room for negotiation, indicating a preference for an engineered diplomatic outcome over open conflict. Trump stated that he expects an agreement could materialize in the near future, emphasizing that reaching a negotiated settlement remains squarely in Tehran's own best interest.

## What this means for you
The potential diplomatic opening and conditions surrounding the Strait of Hormuz directly impact global energy prices and shipping security.

- **Global Oil Prices:** Any agreement to safely reopen the Strait of Hormuz ensures predictable crude supplies across international markets. This would ease volatility and reduce the threat of severe retail fuel price spikes worldwide.
- **Maritime Shipping Costs:** De-escalating tensions in Gulf waters lowers operational war risk insurance premiums for commercial cargo vessels. Lower maritime freight rates prevent additional inflationary pressures on imported commodities and consumer goods.
- **Regional Security and Expatriates:** Ongoing diplomatic mediation reduces the immediate likelihood of open military confrontation across the Middle East. This eases acute safety concerns for foreign expatriates and maritime personnel operating throughout the region.
- **Upcoming Negotiations:** Observers and international markets will closely monitor the next scheduled round of discussions between the parties. Progress in these talks will clarify whether sanctions relief and the lifting of naval blockades are achievable.

## Why this happened
The developments emerged from an escalating regional naval standoff coupled with Washington's dual-track approach of public pressure and private engagement.

- **Disruption of Maritime Corridors:** The closure of the Strait of Hormuz and an active US naval blockade choked commercial shipping in the Gulf. Resolving this severe maritime gridlock made direct or mediated bilateral engagement an urgent economic priority.
- **UNGA Diplomatic Window:** The annual United Nations General Assembly in New York placed top foreign policy delegations in physical proximity. This allowed special envoy Steve Witkoff to formally request and arrange structured talks through diplomatic intermediaries.
- **US Dual-Track Strategy:** The American administration paired threats of total destruction and firm anti-nuclear redlines with offers for a negotiated economic path. This maximum pressure tactic aimed to force Iranian leadership to formalize negotiating terms.
- **Tehran's Economic Priorities:** Iran needed an avenue to challenge the ongoing naval blockade and secure the release of substantial frozen financial assets abroad. Presenting conditions to reopen Hormuz gave Tehran a concrete bargaining chip during initial talks.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. How long did the talks between the US and Iran last in New York?
The discussions spanned approximately three hours and were conducted through intermediary channels.

### 2. Who represented the two countries in the New York discussions?
US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner represented the American side, while Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi represented Iran.

### 3. What was Donald Trump's assessment of the meeting?
Donald Trump characterized the three-hour session as very good and indicated that another meeting would take place soon.

### 4. What demands did Iran present to reopen the Strait of Hormuz?
Iran demanded the lifting of the US naval blockade, the unfreezing of its foreign assets, and an end to regional warfare.

### 5. What warning did Donald Trump issue to Iran at the UN?
Trump warned that failure to reach a deal could lead to Iran being completely destroyed and asserted that Iran will never acquire nuclear weapons.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._