# Rights body orders Arunachal officials to probe alleged assault, vandalism at electoral roll hearing

> The NHRC has ordered Arunachal Pradesh's Chief Secretary to investigate alleged violence and vandalism during a SIR hearing at Bordumsa and submit a report within two weeks. The Chakma students' body AICSU has welcomed the move and demanded action against those responsible.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Arunachal Pradesh · **Published:** 2026-09-08 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/arunachal-pradesh/arunachal-ke-bordumsa-men-sir-sunavai-ke-daurana-hui-hinsa-para-nhrc-ne-mangi-do-haphte-men-riporta-29543 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** AICSU, NHRC, Bordumsa, SIR, Arunachal Pradesh, Changlang, Human Rights Commission, Chakma community

A students' organisation representing the Chakma community in India has praised a decision by the National Human Rights Commission to step in after allegations of violence and destruction of property at a government office in Arunachal Pradesh's Changlang district.

## What happened at Bordumsa
The All India Chakma Students' Union (AICSU) says the trouble broke out on September 4, 2026, inside the ADC-cum-ERO Office at Bordumsa. According to AICSU, the office was hosting a hearing connected to the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls when the alleged violence, vandalism and assault took place. AICSU, which describes itself as the apex body of Chakma students across the country, subsequently took the matter to the NHRC and asked the commission to act on the allegations.

## NHRC orders a time-bound inquiry
The NHRC has taken cognizance of AICSU's complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. The commission has directed the Chief Secretary of Arunachal Pradesh to get the allegations examined and to submit an Action Taken Report within two weeks. AICSU says the commission also noted that the allegations, on the face of it, appear to involve violations of the human rights of those affected by the incident.

## AICSU welcomes the move
Reacting to the NHRC's intervention, AICSU said in a statement, "The country has to run by the rule of law and the Constitution." The organisation added that it had approached the commission because it trusted the NHRC to deliver justice, and called the decision to order an investigation a welcome step by the country's apex human rights body.

## Demand for action against those responsible
AICSU has also pressed the state government to pursue appropriate legal action against everyone found responsible for the alleged violence, vandalism, the assault on a public official, and the destruction of SIR forms during the hearing. The organisation said it expects the Arunachal Pradesh government to carry out a fair, impartial and time-bound inquiry, and to act against all those found guilty once the probe is complete.

## What this means for you
This case could shape how alleged intimidation during the ongoing electoral roll revision is handled across the country.

- **Across India:** The NHRC's order sets a precedent for how complaints of violence during SIR hearings elsewhere in the country may be investigated. Anyone who believes they faced obstruction or assault while participating in the roll-revision process now has a concrete example of the NHRC stepping in under Section 12 of the Protection of Human Rights Act.
- **In Arunachal Pradesh:** Officials in Changlang district, including the Chief Secretary's office, must complete an inquiry and file an Action Taken Report within two weeks of the NHRC's direction. Residents of Bordumsa, especially Chakma families whose SIR forms were allegedly destroyed, may need to have their documents and applications re-verified once the probe concludes.
- **For public officials:** The directive signals that assaults on officials conducting government duties, such as SIR hearings, will now draw human rights scrutiny, not just a routine police case. Officials posted at ADC-cum-ERO offices during the revision exercise can expect closer monitoring and possibly extra security after this incident.
- **For SIR applicants:** If forms were destroyed during the alleged vandalism, affected residents may need to refile or confirm their electoral roll entries once local authorities complete the inquiry and clarify the process.

## Why this happened
The material does not explain what specifically triggered the alleged violence inside the Bordumsa office, only that it broke out during a hearing tied to the SIR of electoral rolls on September 4, 2026. The NHRC's move followed a formal complaint, not an on-the-ground finding of cause.

- **Trigger for NHRC's involvement:** AICSU, describing itself as the apex body of Chakma students in India, filed the complaint that prompted the commission to act under Section 12 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
- **Cause of the violence itself:** This has not been established in the available material; the Chief Secretary's inquiry, due within two weeks, is meant to determine exactly what happened and who was responsible.
- **Context of the hearing:** The incident occurred during a hearing connected to the SIR exercise, an electoral roll revision process, though what was specifically being discussed or disputed at that hearing is not detailed.
- **What happens next:** The Chief Secretary must submit an Action Taken Report within two weeks, after which legal action against those found responsible can follow, as AICSU has demanded.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. What happened at Bordumsa?
AICSU alleges violence, vandalism and assault occurred at the ADC-cum-ERO Office in Bordumsa, Changlang district, on September 4, 2026, during a SIR hearing.

### 2. Who filed the complaint with the NHRC?
The All India Chakma Students' Union (AICSU) approached the NHRC seeking action over the incident.

### 3. What action has the NHRC taken?
It has taken cognizance under Section 12 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, and directed Arunachal Pradesh's Chief Secretary to investigate and submit an Action Taken Report within two weeks.

### 4. What did the NHRC say about the allegations?
According to AICSU, the commission observed that the allegations prima facie appear to involve violations of the human rights of the victims.

### 5. What is AICSU asking the state government to do?
It wants a fair, impartial and time-bound inquiry and legal action against everyone found responsible for the violence, vandalism, assault on a public official and destruction of SIR forms.

### 6. What is the SIR hearing that was underway?
It was a hearing related to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

### 7. By when must the Chief Secretary respond?
Within two weeks of the NHRC's direction.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._