# Internal Rifts Surface 14 Times in Election Commission as Shiv Sena UBT Accuses Gyanesh Kumar and Amit Shah

> Shiv Sena UBT has targeted the Election Commission over voter roll revisions, claiming the Chief Election Commissioner took arbitrary actions despite 14 internal objections from fellow commissioners.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Bihar · **Published:** 2026-09-24 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/bihar/chunava-ayoga-ke-bhitara-14-bara-ubhare-matabheda-shiv-sena-ubt-ne-gyanesh-kumar-aura-amit-shah-para-lagae-gnbhira-aropa-37727 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Election Commission, Shiv Sena UBT, Gyanesh Kumar, Voter List, Amit Shah, Maharashtra Elections, Politics

Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) has launched a scathing attack on the functioning and integrity of the Election Commission of India. The party alleged that the election watchdog is operating in a subservient manner, eroding the general public's trust in vital democratic institutions. Citing internal developments in an editorial of its mouthpiece Saamna, the political outfit highlighted severe institutional fissures within the commission over the past ten months. It claimed that fellow Election Commissioners Sukhbir Sandhu and Vivek Joshi formally raised objections at least 14 times against the arbitrary and high-handed working style of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

## Internal Objections Sidelined and Matter Escalated to Cabinet Secretariat
According to the editorial details, the formal objections and dissenting views raised by the two commissioners were repeatedly brushed aside by Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The party alleged that additions and deletions of voters were conducted unilaterally to provide electoral advantages to the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. With no resolution achieved internally within the election body, the two dissenting commissioners reportedly escalated the issue directly to the Cabinet Secretariat. This official escalation brought the escalating administrative friction within the commission to the formal attention of the Prime Minister's Office.

## Allegations Surrounding Special Summary Revision and Voter Rolls
The party directed severe criticism at the Special Summary Revision process, characterizing it as a systemic scheme. The editorial asserted that under the cover of this revision drive, approximately 13 crore citizens across India were stripped of their voting rights, including several prominent personalities and eminent citizens. In the specific context of Maharashtra, it claimed that more than two crore voter names were removed from the electoral registers. Furthermore, the editorial pointed to an abrupt surge of 42 lakh votes during the recent Maharashtra assembly elections, alleging that this sudden increase directly aided the victory of the BJP-led alliance.

## Party Splits and Broader Questions on Institutional Credibility
The critique further argued that deliberate deletions from electoral rolls were not isolated to Maharashtra, stating that similar patterns involving lakhs of voters were carried out during assembly elections in West Bengal and Bihar. Directly targeting Union Home Minister Amit Shah, the party labelled him the central architect behind this constitutional decline. Additionally, former Chief Election Commissioner Rajiv Kumar and present chief Gyanesh Kumar were held responsible for undermining democracy. The editorial also accused the commission's leadership of enabling splits within political organizations by allocating original party names and election symbols to breakaway factions.

## Demand for Prime Ministerial Action and Role of Opposition Leaders
The publication voiced grave concern that the public has lost faith in crucial constitutional pillars, including the Supreme Court and the Election Commission. Calling for immediate intervention from Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the editorial stated that constitutional principles cannot hold meaning while the key figures involved remain in authority. It argued that because those officials will not step down voluntarily, removing them remains the only viable course of action for the government. Lastly, the party commended opposition leaders, including Rahul Gandhi, Mamata Banerjee, Uddhav Thackeray, and Tejashwi Yadav, for consistently questioning electoral anomalies, while also acknowledging the principled stand taken by Commissioners Sukhbir Sandhu and Vivek Joshi in raising internal flags.

## What this means for you
This political controversy surrounding the Election Commission and voter rolls directly affects citizen confidence in electoral integrity.

- **Across India:** Registered citizens must proactively verify their inclusion in the official electoral rolls on a regular basis. Any voter whose registration has been unexpectedly deleted will need to submit appropriate correction forms well ahead of upcoming polls.
- **In Maharashtra:** Local residents face heightened urgency in verifying their voter status in light of claims that over two crore names were purged. Following controversies over recent assembly elections, voters in the state should confirm their registration details and polling booths online.
- **Administrative Accountability:** Public and political scrutiny over internal decision-making within the election management body will significantly intensify. This could result in growing demands for verifiable transparency during future summary revision exercises.
- **Political Repercussions:** Opposition groups are likely to mount increased legal and legislative pressure concerning electoral conduct and roll verification. This debate is expected to trigger wider discussions in parliament and judicial forums over systemic reforms.

## Why this happened
This strong reaction from Shiv Sena UBT was triggered by reports of internal dissent voiced by two sitting Election Commissioners. The party linked these internal friction reports directly to recent assembly election outcomes and ongoing grievances regarding voter lists.

- **Disclosure of Internal Dissent:** Formal objections were submitted at least 14 times over ten months by Commissioners Sukhbir Sandhu and Vivek Joshi against the CEC's working style. The subsequent escalation of this grievance to the Cabinet Secretariat brought the internal crisis into the open political sphere.
- **Contentious Voter Roll Revisions:** Allegations centered on the Special Summary Revision process, claiming 13 crore names nationally and 2 crore in Maharashtra were removed. In addition, an unexplained surge of 42 lakh votes during the Maharashtra elections amplified suspicions among opposition ranks.
- **Grievances Over Party Splits:** Lingering resentment remains over previous decisions by the election authority to award original party identities and symbols to splinter factions. The party views these administrative verdicts as evidence of institutional bias.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. What are the primary allegations leveled by Shiv Sena UBT against the Election Commission?
The party accused the commission of compromising its neutrality, acting arbitrarily, and carrying out biased voter roll revisions.

### 2. What internal conflict within the Election Commission was highlighted?
The editorial stated that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Sandhu and Vivek Joshi formally recorded objections 14 times over ten months against the CEC.

### 3. How did the internal dispute reach the Cabinet Secretariat and the PMO?
After their objections were repeatedly ignored within the commission, the two dissenting commissioners escalated the matter directly to the Cabinet Secretariat.

### 4. What figures were cited regarding voter roll deletions?
The editorial claimed that around 13 crore names nationally and over 2 crore voters in Maharashtra were struck off during the revision process.

### 5. What specific assertion was made about the Maharashtra assembly election?
It alleged that a sudden increase of 42 lakh votes occurred during the election, benefiting the ruling coalition.

### 6. Which political figures were commended in the editorial?
The editorial praised Rahul Gandhi, Mamata Banerjee, Uddhav Thackeray, and Tejashwi Yadav for raising concerns about electoral irregularities.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._