Opposition Launches Nationwide Stir Over Election Commission Functioning, Demands Action Against CEC Gyanesh Kumar Protests erupted across India as Congress, RJD, and CJP intensified actions against CEC Gyanesh Kumar over electoral roll revisions and centralised decision-making. Disputes surrounding the functioning of the Election Commission of India and its Special Intensive Revision (SIR) procedures escalated into nationwide street demonstrations on Friday, September 25, 2026. Opposition groups and civil rights organisations have mobilised cadres across various states, alleging that the poll body has transformed into a centralised operation where internal dissent is repeatedly ignored. High-level security arrangements were activated in New Delhi, particularly surrounding the central office of the poll authority, as multiple political formations initiated picketing and protest marches. Prashant Bhushan Demands Prosecution Over Centralised System Senior advocate Prashant Bhushan termed the brewing controversy inside the poll body an exceptionally grave development. He alleged that Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar has consolidated the working of the commission under unilateral control, consistently bypassing the formal reservations expressed by the other two election commissioners. Bhushan further pointed out that the entire information technology framework of the Election Commission has undergone centralized restructuring. Under this setup, crucial choices regarding the inclusion or omission of voter records are being controlled directly from Delhi. Stating that such centralization undermines constitutional norms, Bhushan asserted that Gyanesh Kumar should not only be removed from his post but ought to face formal judicial prosecution for these structural actions. Congress Demonstrations and Youth Wing March in Delhi The Congress party organized nationwide protests directly outside the administrative premises of the Election Commission across different regions to oppose the current SIR exercise. In the national capital, security apparatus around the Election Commission building was significantly reinforced to monitor the converging crowds. Simultaneously, the Indian Youth Congress organized a direct agitation in central Delhi, scheduling a protest march from 5 Raisina Road toward Jantar Mantar. Law enforcement agencies deployed additional personnel along major arterial points to manage the gathering and secure government establishments against unauthorized blockades. Jairam Ramesh Draws Comparison on Youth Voting Rights Weighing in on the escalating conflict, Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh posted a detailed observation on social media platform X, contrasting previous political leadership with the current dispensation. He remarked that while one prime minister empowered the younger generation with franchise, another attempted to strip it away. Ramesh elaborated that the 61st Constitutional Amendment Act, enacted in December 1988, fundamentally reformed India's democratic landscape by reducing the minimum voting age from 21 years to 18 years. He emphasized that this historic legislative shift granted youth immediate access to the ballot box, a foundation that he alleged is now being weakened by current electoral roll procedures. CJP Issues 78-Hour Ultimatum Over Internal Commission Dissent Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) convener Abhijeet Dipke launched a fierce critique against the current administration of the poll watchdog. Reference was made to findings indicating that two junior election commissioners disagreed with Gyanesh Kumar's directives, registering as many as 14 formal objections over a 10-month span. Following these revelations, Dipke issued a direct 78-hour ultimatum demanding the immediate resignation of CEC Gyanesh Kumar. The convener stated that failure to step down within this timeframe would trigger intensified demonstrations at Jantar Mantar. CJP put forward three core demands: setting up an independent inquiry into the SIR exercise, restoring previous voter registries, and overhauling the selection procedure for election commissioners. Dipke also questioned opposition parties on why they contest elections if tampering persists, claiming large numbers of voters were deleted in constituencies linked to opposition figures like Mamata Banerjee, MK Stalin, and Pinarayi Vijayan. RJD Conducts State-Level Effigy Burning Across Bihar In Bihar, the Rashtriya Janata Dal took the offensive directly across the state on September 25 with a coordinated campaign targeting CEC Gyanesh Kumar. Agitations were organized at all district administrative centres to register sharp resistance against the commission's handling of voter registers. According to party representatives, the statewide effigy-burning agitation was organized under the explicit instructions of RJD National President Lalu Prasad Yadav and in consultation with Working President Tejashwi Yadav. Party workers gathered at district headquarters around 2:00 PM to burn effigies of the Chief Election Commissioner and submit memorandums opposing the SIR procedures. What this means for you The escalating dispute over electoral roll revision and centralized administrative decisions directly impacts voter verification processes and local civic movement. • Across India: Heightened political scrutiny on centralized voter record updates may force electoral authorities to enhance procedural transparency. Regular voters should proactively verify their voter registration status and ward details on the official electoral portal ahead of upcoming polls. • In Bihar: Effigy-burning drives organized across all district headquarters by RJD have triggered heightened administrative vigil near local election offices. Residents visiting collectorates or local registration centres may experience security checkpoints and transit delays around major administrative complexes. • In New Delhi: Security restrictions and barricades placed around the Election Commission premises, Raisina Road, and Jantar Mantar have curtailed routine pedestrian and vehicular flow. Commuters travelling through central parts of the capital during protest hours will face vehicular diversions and slowed traffic. • For Young Voters: The political debate regarding youth franchise and registration procedures brings greater attention to first-time voter enrolment. Citizens who have recently attained the voting age of 18 years should cross-check their documentary submissions to prevent inadvertent exclusions. Why this happened The public outcry and political friction were triggered by reports of acute internal dissension within the poll panel and concerns over centralized electoral roll management. • Unaddressed Internal Dissent: A media disclosure revealed that two junior election commissioners had formally registered objections 14 times within a 10-month period against executive decisions. This internal pushback provided the initial catalyst for allegations of unilateral decision-making against the Chief Election Commissioner. • Centralization of Voter Systems: Legal figures and opposition leaders highlighted that the technical architecture managing voter records was consolidated centrally in New Delhi. Managing the inclusion and deletion of names remotely removed localized verification oversight, raising suspicions of arbitrary deletions. • Allegations of Targetted Voter Deletions: Civil rights forum CJP asserted that voter rolls in constituencies represented by prominent opposition figures across opposition-governed states suffered mass deletions. These claims quickly transformed ongoing legal grievances into an open street confrontation. Questions & Answers 1. What legal action did Prashant Bhushan demand against the Chief Election Commissioner? Prashant Bhushan demanded that Gyanesh Kumar should not only be removed from office but should also be formally prosecuted. 2. What deadline did CJP issue to CEC Gyanesh Kumar? CJP convener Abhijeet Dipke issued a 78-hour ultimatum demanding the immediate resignation of CEC Gyanesh Kumar. 3. How did RJD organize its agitation across Bihar? RJD scheduled effigy-burning demonstrations across all district headquarters in Bihar at around 2:00 PM on September 25. 4. Which route was selected for the Youth Congress march in New Delhi? The Indian Youth Congress planned a protest march moving from 5 Raisina Road toward Jantar Mantar. 5. Which constitutional amendment did Jairam Ramesh highlight? Jairam Ramesh cited the 61st Constitutional Amendment of December 1988, which reduced the minimum voting age from 21 to 18 years. 6. What numbers were reported regarding internal dissent within the Election Commission? Reports indicated that two junior election commissioners formally registered objections 14 times within a 10-month period. https://trendkia.com/en/bihar/chunava-ayoga-ke-khilapha-saraka-para-utara-vipaksha-gyanesh-kumar-para-gnbhira-aropa-lagate-hue-congress-aura-rjd-ka-joradara-pra-38313 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.