# A Month After He Quit, His Full Salary Still Landed, So Shreyansh Jain Reported It Himself > A month after resigning, Shreyansh Jain still received his full August salary, and he chose to alert the company's founders and return the money himself. **Type:** article · **Category:** Career · **Published:** 2026-09-06 · **Source:** TrendKia **Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/career/istiphe-ke-eka-mahine-bada-bhi-khate-men-ai-puri-sailari-shreyansh-jain-ne-khuda-knpani-ko-batai-garabari-28411 · **Language:** English **Tags:** Shreyansh Jain, payroll mistake, salary dispute, LinkedIn post, ghost employee fraud, offboarding process, corporate ethics A story doing the rounds on LinkedIn shows how a professional flagged and returned a salary payment that was never meant to reach him, weeks after he had already left the company. The account belongs to Shreyansh Jain, whose experience has turned into an unusual case study on workplace honesty and corporate process failure. Jain's last working day at the company was July 31. He did no work for the organisation for the entire month of August. Despite that, on September 1, his bank account was credited with his full salary for August. The payment caught him off guard, since he knew the money was not owed to him. At first, Jain assumed it was a small slip by the payroll team that would be corrected on its own, and he expected the transaction to be reversed automatically. But an entire day passed with no call, no email and no message from the company. Rather than continuing to wait quietly, he decided to act. ## He emailed the founders directly Instead of sitting on the money or waiting for the company to notice, Jain wrote directly to the company's founders, explained the error in detail, and asked for the company's bank details so he could return the amount. The move worked fast: HR became active within hours, and the full sum reached the right account within 48 hours. Jain could easily have kept quiet about the extra money or waited for days, even weeks, for the company to reach out on its own. He did neither, choosing instead to go straight to top management. The episode showed that when intentions are honest, even a serious corporate error can be sorted out in as little as 48 hours, without bitterness or legal trouble. ## When even the system forgot he had resigned According to Jain, mistakes by an individual or by payroll software are not unusual. What stood out here was that the company's own automated system failed to catch such a significant error. Had a former employee not stepped forward on his own, the company may not have realised for months how much of its budget was leaking away. The lesson, he suggested, is not limited to one organisation, it applies to any company that assumes technology alone will catch every slip. ## A lesson for fast-scaling startups The incident is not just a story about one person's integrity, it is also a warning for companies that are expanding quickly. When organisations hire at a rapid pace, their offboarding process often becomes the weak link. A salary landing in a former employee's account is a clear sign of poor coordination between the HR and finance departments, and in most such cases the fault lies with the system rather than any single individual. ## The risk of 'ghost employee' fraud In the corporate world, such cases are often classified under 'ghost employee fraud' or 'payroll slippage.' At many large companies, salaries keep getting paid out in the names of former employees for months, and without regular internal audits, the losses can run into crores of rupees. Such leaks usually surface only when an employee comes forward voluntarily or a major audit is carried out. To guard against this kind of leakage, companies are advised to put three safeguards in place - **Three-way verification:** Resignations should trigger an automated cross-check at the HR, finance and manager level, so no single department can miss the update. - **An offboarding checklist:** An employee's status should be marked 'inactive' in the payroll software on their very last working day. - **Six-monthly payroll audits:** Data on active and relieved employees should be reconciled every six months to catch any mismatch early. Jain's experience is a reminder that no matter how advanced payroll technology becomes, it cannot substitute for human vigilance and honesty. One employee's alertness, and his decision to act rather than stay silent, not only saved the company from a loss but also set an example of trust that technology alone could not have delivered. That combination of honesty and exposed corporate carelessness is likely why the post struck a chord with so many people online. ## What this means for you The episode is a reminder that your responsibilities don't fully end the moment you resign, especially when money is involved. - **For former employees:** If a salary still lands in your account after you've resigned, report it to the company right away instead of spending it. Doing so protects you from legal trouble or accusations later. - **For HR and finance teams:** This case shows how a small gap in the offboarding process can cost a company lakhs of rupees. An employee's status needs to be updated in the system on their very last day. - **For startups:** Don't skip payroll audits while hiring at speed. Reconciling active and relieved employee data every six months can prevent major financial leaks. - **For your professional reputation:** Taking the right step at the right time strengthens your professional credibility, which can pay off in future career opportunities. ## Questions & Answers ### 1. When was Shreyansh Jain's last working day at the company? July 31. ### 2. When did his full August salary get credited? On September 1, even though he had done no work in August. ### 3. Who did Shreyansh Jain inform about the mistake? He emailed the company's founders directly. ### 4. How long did it take for the money to reach the company? The full amount reached the right account within 48 hours. ### 5. Why did the company make this mistake? His status wasn't updated as inactive in the payroll system after resignation, and there was a coordination gap between HR and finance. ### 6. What can companies do to prevent this kind of error? Adopt three-way verification, an offboarding checklist, and six-monthly payroll audits. ## Inspiration & Lessons Shreyansh Jain's story is a reminder of how much professional honesty and timely decisions can matter. - **Take initiative instead of staying silent:** Even when the mistake is the company's, coming forward on your own is a far better choice than sitting quietly. - **Reach the right person:** Jain emailed the founders directly, which got the matter resolved within hours instead of it getting stuck at a lower level. - **Honesty builds trust:** His decision to return the money not only resolved the issue but also strengthened his professional credibility. - **Responsibility doesn't end with the job:** Behaving correctly even in matters tied to a former employer tends to pay off in the long run. --- _TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._