# Allahabad High Court Drops Two Disputed Questions From UPTET 2026, Revised Results to Be Calculated on 148 Marks

> The Allahabad High Court has ordered the removal of two controversial questions from the UPTET 2026 evaluation process. The qualifying results will now be recalculated out of 148 marks instead of 150.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Career · **Published:** 2026-11-01 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/career/allahabad-high-court-ne-uptet-2026-ke-do-vivadita-savala-hatae-aba-148-ankon-ke-adhara-para-jari-hoga-snshodhita-parinama-54195 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** UPTET 2026, Allahabad High Court, UP Education Service Selection Commission, Teacher Eligibility Test, Revised Result, UPTET Cut Off

In a significant legal intervention concerning the Uttar Pradesh Teacher Eligibility Test 2026, the Allahabad High Court has directed the examining authority to exclude two disputed questions from the final evaluation. This judicial order directly alters the scoring framework for hundreds of thousands of teaching aspirants across the state. Candidates who narrowly missed the qualifying cut-off mark by just a fraction of a point now stand to see their qualification status re-evaluated under a revised marking system.

## Origin of the Answer Key Dispute in Master Question Paper
The primary level UPTET examination was administered by the Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission on 3 July, followed by the declaration of official results on 26 August. The controversy surfaced immediately after the release of the final answer key. Candidates raised strong objections regarding question number 36 and question number 37 in the master set. In its final answer key, the commission treated two separate options as correct for each of these two questions. Accepting multiple contradictory options within an objective multiple-choice format compromised the objectivity and reliability of the evaluation process.

## Why Affected Candidates Approached the High Court
During the tabulation of scores, the commission awarded credit exclusively to candidates who had marked either of the two recognized choices. Candidates who refrained from attempting the questions due to confusing choices, or who selected another alternative, received no credit. As a direct consequence, numerous candidates belonging to the general and OBC categories fell short of the passing benchmark of 82 marks by merely one to one-and-a-half marks and were classified as unsuccessful. Seeking legal redress against this scoring method, Vijay Sonkar along with other aggrieved candidates approached the Allahabad High Court.

## Justice Vinod Diwakar on Objective Testing Integrity
While presiding over the case, Justice Vinod Diwakar observed that whenever an examining body itself validates two conflicting answers for a single multiple-choice question, the fundamental utility of that question ceases to exist. Such ambiguous questions lose their core capability to distinguish between qualified and unqualified candidates. To protect the constitutional right to equality among all test participants, the court directed the testing authority to strike out both contentious questions from the evaluation pool.

## Framework for the Revised Scorecard and Qualification Rules
Under the directive issued by the High Court, the total marks for the UPTET paper will now be scaled down from 150 to 148. The qualifying pass percentages will subsequently be computed on this adjusted base of 148 marks. The commission has been instructed to recalculate the marks of all affected candidates and issue updated scorecards. The court further clarified that clearing the examination and securing a passing certificate serves purely as an eligibility credential, and it does not confer an automatic right to securing a government teaching post.

## What this means for you
The High Court ruling creates a direct opportunity for borderline candidates to secure qualifying status in the UPTET 2026 examination.

- **In Uttar Pradesh:** The performance of all candidates who appeared for the primary level paper will be reassessed against the revised total of 148 marks. Thousands of general and reserved category aspirants who fell short by one or two marks may now become eligible.
- **Commission Compliance:** The Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission must recalculate test scores and publish revised scorecards. Candidates should monitor the official examination portal for instructions regarding the release of updated marks.
- **Employment Clarification:** Securing the updated pass certificate only fulfills the mandatory eligibility criteria for future recruitment drives. The judgment clearly establishes that qualifying does not guarantee direct appointment as a government school teacher.
- **Evaluation Precedent:** Removing ambiguous multiple-choice questions sets a standard for fairness across future state-level competitive tests. Candidates will not face structural score penalties when examination bodies frame flawed answer keys.

## Why this happened
The dispute arose when the examining agency released a final answer key that compromised standard objective testing principles.

- **Validation of Multiple Options:** The Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission accepted two differing options as correct for questions 36 and 37 in the master set. Validating multiple conflicting answers undermined the integrity of an objective test.
- **Unequal Credit Allocation:** Marks were awarded exclusively to candidates who picked one of the two recognized options. Those who skipped the ambiguous questions or chose other options received zero credit, causing many to fail by a narrow margin.
- **Breach of Equal Assessment:** Petitioners argued that this arbitrary scoring pattern violated the constitutional guarantee of equality. The court determined that questions with two correct answers lose their capacity to distinguish candidate merit fairly.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. What order did the Allahabad High Court pass regarding UPTET 2026?
The court directed the removal of question numbers 36 and 37 from evaluation and ordered a revised result based on 148 marks.

### 2. When was the UPTET 2026 primary level examination conducted?
The Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission conducted the test on 3 July, and announced the initial results on 26 August.

### 3. Why did candidates file a petition in the High Court?
The commission validated two answers for two questions and awarded marks selectively, causing many candidates to miss passing marks by one to one-and-a-half points.

### 4. Which judge delivered the verdict in this petition?
The ruling was delivered by Justice Vinod Diwakar of the Allahabad High Court.

### 5. Who was the primary petitioner in this court case?
The petition challenging the answer key was moved by Vijay Sonkar along with other affected aspirants.

### 6. Does qualifying the revised UPTET test guarantee a government teaching job?
No, the court clarified that the passing certificate is strictly an eligibility credential and does not confer direct employment rights.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._