# CUET PG 2026 Result: Why NTA Says No Normalisation Despite Some Papers Being Held Twice

> After some CUET PG 2026 papers were held on different dates, students feared their results would be normalised, but NTA has clarified that every candidate is scored on absolute marks alone.

**Category:** Career · **Published:** 2026-06-13 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/career/cuet-pg-2026-kuchha-vishayon-ki-pariksha-do-bara-hone-para-bhi-nahin-hoga-normal-381

## The Confusion That Spread Among Aspirants
For days, one question dominated conversations among CUET PG 2026 candidates: why were a handful of subjects tested across more than one date? Tied to that was a deeper worry — if the same subject's paper had been held on separate days, would the final result be cooked up using a 'normalisation' formula? To kill the rumour and clear the air, the National Testing Agency (NTA) stepped in with a detailed explanation.

## Why a Second Sitting Became Necessary
According to NTA, while the examinations were underway in March 2026, a breakdown of law and order in Tura, Meghalaya, disrupted the schedule. On top of that, certain foreign examination centres faced security-related hurdles. As a result, a number of candidates simply could not appear at their scheduled time — through no fault of their own. In all, 565 such candidates, spread across 28 different subjects, missed their exam. Putting student welfare first, the agency arranged a fresh sitting for these 565 aspirants on 29 and 30 March 2026.

## NTA's Clear Stand on Normalisation
The agency laid out its policy in plain terms. Every CUET PG candidate, it said, is awarded only 'absolute marks' — their actual scores. At no stage are marks normalised, whether it is the main examination or the rescheduled one. Because of this, candidates who sat the re-exam received no extra concession and no separate advantage. Everyone is being judged on the same yardstick, with complete fairness.

## The Numbers That Make Normalisation Impossible
NTA did not stop at assurances; it backed its point with figures showing why normalisation here is technically unworkable. The pool of candidates who reappeared is so tiny compared to those who took the main exam that any statistical comparison between the two becomes meaningless. A few examples make the gap obvious:

- **English:** Around 16,000 candidates sat the main exam, while only 120 took the re-exam.
- **Political Science:** Roughly 26,000 candidates appeared in the main exam, against just 100 in the reschedule.
- **History:** More than 13,600 candidates took the main exam, while fewer than 80 reappeared.

Comparing a small cluster of just 80 or 100 students against a giant group of thousands to arrive at a normalised score, the agency stresses, is simply not possible.

## Was the Repeat Paper Easier or Harder?
Another fear floating among aspirants was whether the later paper was set at a different level — softer or tougher than the original. NTA addressed this too. The question papers used for the re-exam, it said, had already been prepared and approved in advance by subject experts. Those experts had formally certified that the difficulty level of these papers was exactly on par with the main examination's papers. That leaves no room for any candidate to be treated unfairly.

## The Basis for the Final Score
The bottom line from NTA is unambiguous — the score of every single CUET PG 2026 candidate is being decided purely on equal, real marks. Holding the exam a second time has not altered the scoring pattern in the slightest.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle._