Cape Town Test DRS Row: ICC Reprimands South Africa Coach Ashwell Prince and Kyle Verreynne The ICC has officially reprimanded South Africa batting coach Ashwell Prince and squad member Kyle Verreynne, handing each one demerit point for disputing an umpire's decision during the third Test against Australia in Cape Town. A contentious decision involving the Decision Review System during the third Test between South Africa and Australia in Cape Town has resulted in formal disciplinary action. The International Cricket Council (ICC) issued an official reprimand to South Africa batting coach Ashwell Prince and cricketer Kyle Verreynne following an incident that unfolded immediately after opening batsman Marques Ackerman lost his wicket in the hosts' second innings. The 15-Second DRS Window Dispute The controversy started when Marques Ackerman was given out and sought to challenge the on-field decision through a player review. The match officials declined the request, ruling that the mandatory 15-second timer allocated for signaling a review had already run out. According to standard match conditions, once that window closes without a clear signal from the batter, the on-field decision stands without further deliberation. Boundary Line Delays and Arguments with Officials As Ackerman began walking off towards the pavilion, batting coach Ashwell Prince engaged in repeated arguments with the match officials. Prince insisted that the countdown had not expired and that the batting side still had valid time remaining to request ball-tracking and technology replays. Simultaneously, squad member Kyle Verreynne, who was not included in South Africa's playing eleven for the fixture, intervened by telling Ackerman to remain inside the boundary ropes. This instruction caused an unnecessary delay in Ackerman leaving the field of play, directly hindering the resumption of the contest. Admission of Guilt and Penalties Handed Down Following a review of the incident, the governing body confirmed that both Prince and Verreynne breached Article 2.8 of the Code of Conduct. This regulation specifically governs actions that show dissent toward an umpire's decision during an international match. Because neither individual had committed a disciplinary violation in the preceding 24-month period, each had one demerit point added to their disciplinary record. Both Prince and Verreynne accepted the sanction proposed by ICC match referee Javagal Srinath, eliminating the requirement for any formal disciplinary hearing. Match Officials Report and Series Outcome The charges against the coaching staff member and player were brought forward by on-field umpires Richard Illingworth and Richard Kettleborough, third umpire Chris Gaffaney, and fourth umpire Lubabalo Gcuma. Breaches categorized under Level 1 generally carry penalties ranging from an official warning up to a 50 percent fine of match fees, alongside one or two demerit points. Despite the disruption on the third afternoon, South Africa rallied strongly on the fourth day and unleashed clinical bowling on the final day to overcome Australia, sealing a 2-1 victory in the Test series. What this means for you This disciplinary action sends an unambiguous signal to cricket teams globally that umpire authority and technical time constraints will be strictly enforced. • Strict DRS Timing Enforcement: The ruling reinforces that the 15-second countdown to signal for a player review is absolute. Teams cannot rely on off-field intervention or coaching staff objections once that designated window expires. • Disciplinary Record Consequences: Both Ashwell Prince and Kyle Verreynne now carry one demerit point on their disciplinary records. Accumulating four or more demerit points within a 24-month span leads to suspension points and missed matches. • Role of Non-Playing Squad Members: Players outside the active eleven are barred from instructing batters on field movements or review decisions. Direct intervention from the boundary rope will immediately trigger Level 1 code of conduct charges. • Clarity for Viewers and Followers: Spectators watching international cricket receive a direct demonstration that umpire sovereignty remains non-negotiable. Technology protocols must be respected without boundary-line delay tactics. Why this happened The disciplinary sanctions stemmed from boundary-line protests and delays that occurred after umpires denied a player review request in Cape Town. • Expiry of the 15-Second Window: Following the dismissal of Marques Ackerman in South Africa's second innings, the allotted 15-second timer to request a DRS review elapsed, prompting match officials to reject the appeal. • Protests and Boundary Delays: Batting coach Ashwell Prince repeatedly argued with officials claiming time remained, while non-playing squad member Kyle Verreynne instructed Ackerman to halt inside the boundary ropes. • Breach of Code Article 2.8: The match officials determined that both actions demonstrated dissent towards an umpire's decision, leading the umpiring team to formally lodge charges under the ICC Code of Conduct. Questions & Answers 1. Who did the ICC penalize in the South African camp? The ICC penalized South Africa batting coach Ashwell Prince and cricketer Kyle Verreynne for breaching the code of conduct. 2. When and where did this incident occur? The incident took place on the third day of the third Test against Australia in Cape Town during South Africa's second innings. 3. What triggered the dispute initially? Opening batsman Marques Ackerman sought a DRS review after being dismissed, but umpires refused because the 15-second time limit had expired. 4. What specific actions led to the charges against Prince and Verreynne? Ashwell Prince argued with umpires regarding remaining time, while Kyle Verreynne instructed Ackerman to delay leaving the field at the boundary rope. 5. What penalty was imposed on both individuals? Both received an official reprimand alongside one demerit point added to their disciplinary records. 6. Was a formal disciplinary hearing held? No formal hearing was needed because both individuals admitted to the offense and accepted the sanctions from match referee Javagal Srinath. 7. What was the final outcome of the Test and series? South Africa fought back to defeat Australia in the Cape Town Test and claimed the series 2-1. https://trendkia.com/en/cricket/cape-town-test-drs-vivada-para-icc-ka-sakhta-ekshana-south-africa-ke-kocha-ashwell-prince-aura-kyle-verreynne-ko-lagi-phatakara-55146 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.