# Disha Salian Death Case: CBI Launches Probe After Dad Endures Six Year Quest For Justice

> Following the CBI's registration of an FIR in Disha Salian's death case, her father Satish Salian has expressed relief and submitted several high-profile names to the investigators.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Crime · **Published:** 2026-09-15 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/crime/disha-salian-mamale-men-pita-ke-sngharsha-ki-jita-korta-ke-adesha-para-cbi-ne-darja-ki-fir-32490 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Disha Salian, CBI Investigation, Satish Salian, Mumbai Police, Bombay High Court, Sushant Singh Rajput

The recent registration of a First Information Report (FIR) by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the tragic demise of Disha Salian has marked a massive turning point for her family. Her father, Satish Salian, expressed immense relief and gratitude, describing this breakthrough as a long-awaited step toward uncovering the truth. He confirmed that he has officially recorded his comprehensive statement with the central agency, hoping that a thorough investigation will finally bring peace to his daughter's memory.

## Prominent Personalities and Cover-Up Allegations Named
In his detailed testimony to the CBI investigators, Satish Salian did not hold back. He formally shared several names of high-profile individuals whom he suspects had a connection to the events surrounding his daughter’s death. Among those he explicitly mentioned to the authorities are Aditya Thackeray, Dino Morea, and Sooraj Pancholi, along with their respective private security guards. Furthermore, he raised serious concerns about individuals whom he accuses of actively attempting to suppress the truth and cover up the investigation. This list of names submitted to the central agency includes former high-ranking police officials and other prominent figures, such as Param Bir Singh, Sachin Waze, and Rhea Chakraborty. Satish Salian emphasized that these individuals played a role in preventing a fair inquiry during the initial phases of the probe.

## The Grueling Legal Path to a Central Probe
Reaching this stage of the investigation required a long, painful legal battle for the grieving family. Initially, a Special Investigation Team (SIT) was established by the state authorities to investigate the matter. However, Satish Salian pointed out that this team failed to initiate any meaningful action or deliver substantial results, leaving the family in limbo for nearly two years. Seeking alternative avenues, he eventually met an associate named Ashutosh, who recommended that he consult advocate Nilesh Ojha. Acting on the lawyer's professional advice, the family first approached the police commissioner's office to register an FIR, but they received no response. This silence compelled them to approach the judiciary. The court proceedings proved to be another test of patience, dragging on for about a year and a half with constant delays and rescheduled hearings. After a total of two and a half years of rigorous legal struggle in court, a judicial order was finally passed, directing the case to be handed over to the CBI.

## Severe Criminal Charges Framed in CBI's FIR
Adhering strictly to the directions issued by the Bombay High Court on September 2, the CBI officially registered the FIR on September 13. In compliance with the court's guidelines, the document does not formally name any individual as an accused at this initial stage. However, the FIR invokes several of the most stringent sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). These include Section 120B for criminal conspiracy, Section 376D for gang rape, Section 302 for murder, and Section 201 for the destruction of evidence. Additionally, Sections 217 and 218 have been included, which deal with public servants disobeying the law and fabricating incorrect records to protect offenders. The central agency had already recorded Satish Salian's detailed statement on September 11, which formed the basis for these severe charges.

## Background of the Tragic Incident in Mumbai
The case dates back to June 8, 2020, when 28-year-old Disha Salian, who had briefly worked as a manager for the late Bollywood actor Sushant Singh Rajput, died under mysterious circumstances. She fell from the 12th floor of a residential high-rise building located in the Malad suburb of Mumbai. At the time, the local Mumbai Police had classified the incident as an accidental death and registered an Accidental Death Report (ADR). The family's persistent efforts over the last six years have now culminated in a federal investigation. Expressing his deep-seated emotions and belief in divine justice, her father stated

> We waited for six years. God has finally given us this success.

## What this means for you
The CBI's decision to launch a thorough investigation into the high-profile Disha Salian case under serious criminal charges underscores the power of persistent legal efforts by citizens.

- **Across India:** This case highlights how ordinary families can seek recourse through the higher judiciary when local law enforcement inquiries seem inadequate. It reinforces public confidence in the judicial system's ability to demand accountability regardless of the time elapsed.
- **In Mumbai:** The investigation brings local police procedures and previous SIT actions under intense public and legal scrutiny. It sets a precedent that high-profile cases in the metropolitan city cannot be easily dismissed without exhaustive federal examination.

## Why this happened
The transition of this case to a federal agency occurred due to persistent legal challenges by the victim's family, who suspected foul play and a subsequent cover-up by local authorities.

- **High Court Mandate:** The CBI registered the FIR specifically following a direct order from the Bombay High Court on September 2. This judicial intervention came after a petition was filed by the victim's father challenging the local police's conclusions.
- **Inadequate Local Probe:** The family argued that the initial Accidental Death Report filed by the Mumbai Police and the subsequent SIT investigation failed to look into critical leads. This lack of progress prompted them to seek an independent central probe.
- **Serious Allegations:** The father's formal statement included specific claims of conspiracy, gang rape, and murder, naming several influential political and social figures. These gravity-laden accusations necessitated the invocation of strict IPC sections by the CBI.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. Who was Disha Salian?
She was a 28-year-old talent manager who briefly managed the professional work of the late actor Sushant Singh Rajput.

### 2. When and how did Disha Salian die?
She died on June 8, 2020, after falling from the 12th floor of a residential building in the Malad area of Mumbai.

### 3. Why did the CBI register an FIR in this case?
The CBI registered the FIR on September 13 following a specific order issued by the Bombay High Court on September 2.

### 4. What specific IPC sections are included in the CBI's FIR?
The FIR includes sections for criminal conspiracy (120B), gang rape (376D), murder (302), destruction of evidence (201), and public servants disobeying the law or framing incorrect records (217 and 218).

### 5. Whom did Disha Salian's father name in his statement to the CBI?
Her father, Satish Salian, named several individuals including Aditya Thackeray, Dino Morea, Sooraj Pancholi, Param Bir Singh, Rhea Chakraborty, and Sachin Waze.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._