# Kota Police ASI Ravindra Singh Yadav Arrested While Accepting Bribe Outside Court

> An assistant sub-inspector posted at Nayapura police station in Kota was caught red-handed accepting a 15,000-rupee bribe outside the court premises. The officer had demanded money to clear the names of a complainant's family members from an assault case.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Crime · **Published:** 2026-10-01 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/crime/kota-men-marapita-kesa-se-nama-hatane-ke-nama-para-ghusa-lete-asi-ravindra-singh-yadav-giraphtara-41000 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Kota, Bribery, Rajasthan ACB, Nayapura Police Station, Police Corruption, Ravindra Singh Yadav, Prevention of Corruption Act

A police assistant sub-inspector stationed at the Nayapura police station in Kota district of Rajasthan has been apprehended in a trap operation while accepting an illicit cash payment of 15,000 rupees. The anti-corruption squad caught ASI Ravindra Singh Yadav outside a local court complex after an investigation into allegations of extortion and abuse of power. The officer was investigating an assault and brawl case and had demanded money from a complainant to drop the names of his family members and settle the matter.

## Extortion to Clear Innocent Family Members From Assault FIR
The sequence of events stemmed from an earlier criminal dispute involving physical violence and altercation, which was under investigation at the Nayapura station. The complainant, alongside his parents and brother, had been named as accused in the police record. The complainant maintained that he was not even present at the location when the clash occurred, yet the investigating officer continued to mount pressure on him.

Exploiting the fear of prosecution, ASI Ravindra Singh Yadav allegedly demanded illegal gratification to dilute the charges and remove the names of the complainant's family members from the case diary. The complainant had already paid 35,000 rupees to the police officer under duress. Despite having received that sum, the officer insisted on an additional 30,000 rupees to close the file completely. Unwilling to yield to further demands, the complainant approached the Anti-Corruption Bureau with a formal grievance.

## Verification of Complaint and Operation Planning
Upon receiving the complaint, DSP Chandra Kanwar oversaw the preliminary verification of the charges. The verification exercise confirmed that the officer was indeed demanding unlawful payments in exchange for official favours and relief in the pending criminal inquiry. Once the bribery allegations were substantiated on record, the bureau structured an undercover trap to catch the officer in the act.

As per the arrangement, the complainant negotiated to pay 15,000 rupees as the next instalment of the demanded amount. The intelligence team of the agency prepared for field deployment across the Nayapura jurisdiction, positioning personnel around the anticipated meeting spot.

## Red-Handed Capture Outside Court Gate Number 3
The transaction took place on the main road situated directly opposite Gate Number 3 of the court premises in Nayapura. The complainant arrived at the designated spot and handed over the 15,000 rupees in currency to the waiting police officer. At that moment, bureau officers stationed nearby moved in swiftly and apprehended Ravindra Singh Yadav with the marked cash in his possession.

The bribe amount was recovered on the spot, and the ASI was taken into immediate custody. Following the seizure and formalities, the accused officer was transported back to the Nayapura police station, where he spent the night inside the lockup barracks. The dramatic apprehension outside the judicial compound sparked considerable discussions across the regional police establishment.

## Court Presentation and Scope of Ongoing Probe
DSP Chandra Kanwar stated that formal legal proceedings under the Prevention of Corruption Act have been initiated against the detained officer. The bureau scheduled his presentation before the competent court to advance custodial and procedural formalities.

Investigators are now examining the full history of the assault inquiry, specifically reviewing how the case was handled and tracking the previously paid 35,000 rupees. The anti-corruption team noted that further documentation, case records, and statements are being scrutinized to uncover any additional irregularities committed during the investigation.

## What this means for you
This enforcement action highlights that citizens subjected to unlawful police extortion can effectively seek intervention through anti-corruption authorities.

- **Across India:** Citizens facing bribery demands from public servants during criminal investigations can directly approach state anti-corruption departments or dedicated helplines. Reporting such demands early prevents vulnerable families from being coerced into paying illicit settlements.
- **In Kota:** Residents dealing with police matters in Nayapura or other local stations can directly alert the regional anti-corruption unit if an investigating officer solicits money. The arrest is likely to result in heightened administrative scrutiny over pending inquiries at local police posts.
- **For Litigants:** Individuals named in disputes should refrain from paying under-the-table settlements to alter police case diaries. The proper course involves submitting evidentiary facts through legal counsel and petitions before supervisory officers or the court.
- **For Public Accountability:** A transparent arrest right outside judicial premises strengthens citizen trust in institutional checks against police malpractice. Such enforcement reinforces deterrence against officers demanding gratification during case investigations.

## Why this happened
The arrest occurred because the investigating officer attempted to extort money from a family named in an assault case rather than conducting an objective inquiry. The complainant approached anti-corruption officials after the officer demanded additional payments despite having already taken money.

- **Direct Trigger:** ASI Ravindra Singh Yadav demanded and accepted an instalment of 15,000 rupees to drop the complainant's family members from an ongoing assault case. He was caught red-handed as soon as he received the marked currency outside the court gate.
- **Underlying Context:** The complainant stated he was not present during the altercation, yet he and his parents and brother were named in the police record. Exploiting this leverage, the officer had already extorted 35,000 rupees and demanded an additional 30,000 rupees to settle the file.
- **Trap Setup:** Frustrated by persistent harassment, the complainant lodged a formal complaint with the Anti-Corruption Bureau. Officials discreetly verified the bribery demand and deployed a trap unit near the court where the transaction was scheduled.
- **Procedural Follow-Up:** The officer is being prosecuted under the Prevention of Corruption Act and presented in court. Investigators are tracing the previously paid 35,000 rupees and auditing the original assault file for tampering.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. Which police officer was arrested in Kota and on what charges?
ASI Ravindra Singh Yadav from the Nayapura police station was arrested for taking a 15,000-rupee bribe to remove a complainant's family members from an assault case.

### 2. How much money had the accused officer demanded in total?
According to the complaint, the ASI had already received 35,000 rupees earlier and was demanding an additional 30,000 rupees to settle the case.

### 3. Where was the trap operation executed?
The operation was executed on the main road directly opposite Gate Number 3 of the court premises in Nayapura.

### 4. What was the complainant's contention regarding the original incident?
The complainant stated he was not present at the scene during the physical dispute, yet the officer named him and his family members to harass them.

### 5. What legal action is being taken against the accused officer?
A case has been initiated under the Prevention of Corruption Act, and the officer is being produced before the court as the investigation continues.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._