{
  "type": "article",
  "title": "Man Seeking Revenge on Wife Lands in Trap Over Triple Murder: How a Complaint Unearthed a Buried Body in Surat",
  "summary": "A man who approached the Ahmedabad City Crime Branch to frame his estranged wife and her cousin for murder ended up confessing to killing three women in 2022, including burying his mother-in-law in concrete.",
  "content": "A calculated scheme to implicate an estranged wife in a murder case backfired dramatically in Gujarat when the complainant himself turned out to be the perpetrator of three killings. What began as a tip-off brought to the Ahmedabad City Crime Branch regarding an elderly woman's murder unraveled into a confession covering a series of violent crimes dating back to 2022, exposing a sinister attempt to use the police machinery for personal vengeance.\n\nThe Web of Deceit Woven to Frame Relatives\nThe sequence of events commenced when Madhavdas Bhaktiram Sadhu walked into the Ahmedabad City Crime Branch with serious accusations. He claimed that Shantaben Gambhirbhai Vasava, his 85-year-old mother-in-law and a resident of Kabristan Faliya in Kosamba within the Mangrol taluka of Surat district, had been murdered four to five years earlier. Madhavdas told authorities that the fatal act had been executed by his wife, Urmila alias Jaya, and her cousin brother, Afzal alias Poto Diwan. To lend gravity to his claim, he insisted that the victim's remains were buried deep beneath a layer of cement right inside the house.\n\nInterrogation Crumbles the False Allegations\nActing on the specific information provided by Madhavdas, the Crime Branch summoned Afzal to their office for a thorough interrogation. During questioning, Afzal categorically denied having any knowledge or involvement in the killing of Shantaben. Crucially, the investigating team could find zero evidence or corroborative trails linking Afzal to the alleged incident.\n\nFaced with inconsistencies, the investigators decided to subject both Madhavdas and Afzal to sustained and detailed examination. ACP (Crime Branch) Bharat Patel noted that once Afzal's innocence became apparent, the entire direction of the probe shifted onto Madhavdas. Patel explained that Madhavdas had initially presented himself before the Crime Branch acting as an informant, attempting to portray his wife and Afzal as cold-blooded killers. However, under close scrutiny, Madhavdas broke down and admitted that he had falsely dragged Afzal into the narrative.\n\nDomestic Conflict and the Motive of Retaliation\nWhen questioned on why he fabricated such severe charges, Madhavdas revealed a bitter domestic dispute. He told investigators that his wife, Urmila, had walked out on him approximately nine months earlier, taking their son along with gold and silver jewelry and household cash. Suspecting his wife's motives and consumed by resentment over her prolonged separation, he sought retribution. Madhavdas acknowledged to detectives that his sole objective in feeding false tips against his wife and Afzal was to exact revenge and ensure they were incarcerated.\n\nThe Horrific Details of the 2022 Concrete Burial\nThe probe took a much darker turn as detectives pressed further into the past. Patel confirmed that Madhavdas eventually confessed to the murder of three women, his mother, his mother-in-law, and his sister-in-law, all executed in 2022. The Crime Branch disclosed that Madhavdas and Urmila had acted together in committing these homicides.\n\nRegarding the first case, investigators revealed that Madhavdas and Urmila murdered 85-year-old Shantaben on the night of October 7, 2022. They allegedly smothered her to death using a pillow. To conceal the crime, they placed her body inside a large metal drum, poured three bags of cement along with water over the corpse, and kept the sealed container inside the house for nearly three and a half months. Later, the perpetrators cut open the drum, removed the hardened concrete block enclosing the remains, and buried it inside a pit dug out on their veranda.\n\nWhat this means for you\nThis case demonstrates the severe legal perils of fabricating evidence and attempting to manipulate law enforcement agencies for personal retribution.\n\n• Across India: Lodging false criminal allegations and misleading investigating agencies invites stringent punitive actions under the legal framework. It serves as a reminder that forensic evaluation quickly dismantles manufactured claims designed to frame personal rivals.\n• In Surat and Ahmedabad: Prompt and methodical verification by local investigators prevented an innocent relative from being wrongful prosecuted. The breakthrough reinforces public faith in Gujarat's investigative machinery regarding cold cases and concealed homicides.\n• Public Safety: The unearthing of a two-year-old hidden homicide confirms that serious offenses eventually catch up with the perpetrators regardless of how well evidence was hidden. It sends a deterrent message against attempting to bury major crimes under domestic pretexts.\n• Resolution of Domestic Disputes: Spouses dealing with matrimonial discord or separation must rely strictly on lawful channels to address custody and financial issues. Attempting vengeance through fabricated police complaints exposes the schemer to direct criminal culpability.\n\nWhy this happened\nThis breakthrough occurred when an estranged husband attempted to frame his wife and her cousin using a fabricated murder accusation, which promptly collapsed under police scrutiny.\n\n• Direct Trigger: The accused, Madhavdas, was infuriated after his wife left him roughly nine months prior, taking their child, cash, and gold and silver jewelry, prompting him to seek vengeance.\n• Suspicion and Manufactured Charges: Driven by resentment over his wife's separation, Madhavdas falsely informed detectives that his wife and Afzal had murdered 85-year-old Shantaben to ensure their arrest.\n• Probe Turned Against Complainant: When questioning revealed Afzal had no involvement in the crime, investigators scrutinized the contradictions in Madhavdas's statements, which culminated in his confession to three homicides.\n• Calculated Concealment: The perpetrators had attempted to prevent odor and hide evidence by sealing the victim's body inside a metal drum with three bags of cement before burying the solid block in their veranda.\n\nQuestions & Answers\n\n1. What initial complaint did Madhavdas lodge with the Crime Branch?\nMadhavdas claimed that his wife Urmila and her cousin brother Afzal had killed his 85-year-old mother-in-law Shantaben.\n\n2. What did investigators discover regarding Afzal's involvement?\nThe Crime Branch found zero evidence linking Afzal to the crime, and he denied having any knowledge of the murder.\n\n3. Why did Madhavdas fabricate the complaint against his wife and Afzal?\nHis wife had left him nine months earlier with their son, jewelry, and cash, driving him to seek revenge by getting them jailed.\n\n4. How many murders did Madhavdas ultimately confess to committing?\nMadhavdas confessed to murdering three women in 2022, namely his mother, his mother-in-law, and his sister-in-law.\n\n5. When and how was Shantaben murdered according to the police?\nShantaben was allegedly smothered to death with a pillow on the night of October 7, 2022.\n\n6. How was the victim's body concealed after the killing?\nThe body was sealed in a drum with three bags of cement and water, and later buried in a veranda pit after cutting open the drum.",
  "url": "https://trendkia.com/en/crime/surat-men-tripala-mardara-ki-khauphanaka-dastana-patni-ko-phnsane-pahuncha-pati-khuda-salakhon-ke-pichhe-drama-katakara-daphana-ki-41296",
  "category": "Crime",
  "publishedAt": "2026-10-01",
  "tags": [
    "Surat Crime",
    "Ahmedabad Crime Branch",
    "Triple Murder",
    "Madhavdas Sadhu",
    "Gujarat Police",
    "Murder Confession"
  ],
  "language": "en",
  "site": "TrendKia"
}