Congress Questions EVM Integrity and DU Administration Impartiality Following DUSU Election Results After failing to win any seat in the 2026 DUSU elections, the Congress party has accused the Delhi University administration of bias and EVM discrepancies. Delhi Congress chief Devender Yadav has demanded an independent inquiry into the entire voting process. Political tensions have surged in the national capital following the declaration of the Delhi University Students' Union (DUSU) election 2026 results. The Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) registered a 3-0 clean sweep across the posts of President, Secretary, and Joint Secretary, while an independent candidate clinched the remaining post. The Congress party's student wing, the National Students' Union of India (NSUI), failed to open its account. In the wake of this electoral outcome, Congress launched a sharp attack against the Delhi University administration and the ruling establishment, alleging electronic voting machine discrepancies and administrative bias. Allegations of Institutional Bias and Campaign Disparities Devender Yadav, president of the Delhi Pradesh Congress Committee, accused the university administration of employing double standards and undermining democratic values. He expressed deep concern over what he termed unequal treatment meted out to candidates during the campaign trail. According to Yadav, NSUI candidates were reportedly barred from entering several college premises and conducting outreach programs, while ABVP nominees were readily granted access, campaign space, and institutional facilities. Yadav pointedly questioned how the university's infrastructure and college campuses were permitted to be utilized for ABVP meetings despite the model code of conduct being formally enforced throughout the election cycle. Concerns Over Lyngdoh Guidelines and EVM Transparency Challenging the university administration's oversight, Congress highlighted alleged breaches of the Lyngdoh Committee guidelines. Yadav asserted that certain candidates who bypassed standard university norms and Lyngdoh regulations were still allowed to contest and canvass votes without impediment. Furthermore, he emphasized the serious apprehensions voiced by students and candidates regarding the functioning of EVMs and the overall transparency of the vote tabulation process, noting that the administration is obligated to address these concerns. Three Demands Put Forward by the Congress Following the outcome of the polls, the Congress outlined three specific demands before the Delhi University authorities • An independent, transparent, and fair inquiry must be initiated into all complaints received during the election process. • Equal regulations and a level playing field must be strictly enforced for all student outfits and contenders in upcoming elections. • Decisive punitive action should be taken against any officials or candidates found guilty of violating election rules and the code of conduct. Administrative Scrutiny and Political Undercurrents Devender Yadav stated that any compromise on students' democratic rights and the institutional credibility of university polls would not be tolerated, demanding clarity on why rules appeared disparate across student bodies. Conversely, ABVP dismissed these claims entirely, describing the accusations as manifestations of Congress's political frustration following defeat. The 2026 election outcome defied several campaign expectations. Social media visibility had initially pointed toward stronger prospects for NSUI, especially as ABVP faced scrutiny over the Jantar Mantar demonstration and the Delhi PG hostel incident. However, active mobilization and campaigning by local BJP leaders bolstered ABVP's footprint. In contrast, prominent senior Congress figures were visibly absent from supporting NSUI candidates. The electoral outcome was further shaped by internal dynamics, particularly after candidates such as Vishesh Yadav, who was denied a ticket by NSUI, contested independently. What this means for you This dispute directly influences campus governance and upcoming student representation at Delhi University. • Across India: Debates surrounding electoral oversight and transparency in central university polls will gain renewed traction. This may prompt broader discussions on reforming campus election procedures nationwide. • In Delhi: Representation dynamics across Delhi University colleges will directly impact regular campus policies and student welfare committees. Administrative authorities may also introduce stricter checks regarding campus campaigning and infrastructure usage in future election cycles. Why this happened The confrontation erupted after ABVP swept the major posts in the 2026 DUSU elections, leaving NSUI without a single victory. The defeat sparked allegations of institutional partiality and administrative lapses during the campaign. • Alleged Unequal Access: Congress asserted that its candidate outreach was actively curtailed in college campuses while rival candidates enjoyed full access. This uneven playing field is cited as a primary reason for the contentious outcome. • Doubts on Regulations and EVMs: Allegations concerning non-compliance with the Lyngdoh Committee guidelines and transparency issues during EVM voting fueled student grievances. These pending complaints escalated into demands for administrative accountability. • Organizational Factors: Local BJP leadership actively supported the ABVP campaign, whereas high-profile Congress leaders remained absent from student outreach. Internal factional issues, including independent candidacies by figures like Vishesh Yadav, further fractured the opposition vote share. Questions & Answers 1. Which organization won the majority of seats in the DUSU 2026 elections? ABVP won the posts of President, Secretary, and Joint Secretary with a 3-0 tally, while an independent candidate secured the remaining post. 2. What primary allegations did the Congress party make after the results? Congress accused the Delhi University administration of institutional bias, unequal campaign facilities, and raised questions regarding EVM transparency. 3. What three demands did the Delhi Congress president place before the administration? He demanded an independent inquiry into election grievances, equal enforcement of rules for all student bodies in the future, and disciplinary action against code of conduct violators. 4. How did the ABVP respond to the allegations raised by the Congress? ABVP dismissed the claims as baseless, characterizing the accusations as an expression of political frustration following a total electoral defeat. https://trendkia.com/en/delhi/dusu-chunava-natijon-ke-bada-evm-aura-nishpakshata-para-congress-ne-khare-kie-savala-tina-pramukha-mangen-rakhin-34351 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.