{
  "type": "article",
  "title": "Former WFI Chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh Acquitted in Sexual Harassment Case by Delhi Court",
  "summary": "Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court has acquitted former WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and co-accused Vinod Tomar in the sexual harassment case filed by female wrestlers.",
  "content": "In a major legal development, Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court has acquitted Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, the former president of the Wrestling Federation of India, in connection with the sexual harassment case brought against him by female wrestlers. The court also cleared co-accused Vinod Tomar, the former assistant secretary of the WFI, of all charges. The case stemmed from allegations made by prominent female athletes regarding incidents that allegedly took place during Singh's tenure at the helm of the wrestling body. Following an extensive trial conducted behind closed doors, the court issued its order after considering arguments from both sides.\n\nIn-Camera Proceedings and Legal Arguments\nThe trial was conducted in-camera to maintain confidentiality given the sensitive nature of the allegations. Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ashwani Panwar presided over the matter and reserved the judgment after hearing comprehensive arguments from both the prosecution and defense counsel. Senior Advocate Rebecca John represented the complaining wrestlers during the final hearings, outlining their grievances and evidence. Conversely, the defense team, headed by Advocate Rajiv Mohan along with Advocates Rehan Khan and Rishabh Bhati, concluded its final arguments on June 30. The court subsequently instructed both legal teams to submit their written statements within two weeks. Earlier in May, statements from a Special Investigation Team member and the Investigating Officer were officially recorded as part of the evidentiary process.\n\n \n\nFrom Jantar Mantar Protests to the 1,500-Page Chargesheet\nThe legal action originated from high-profile public protests staged by top Indian female wrestlers at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi. Following their formal complaints, Delhi Police conducted a detailed probe and submitted a comprehensive 1,500-page chargesheet on June 15, 2023. The chargesheet contained allegations under Indian Penal Code Sections 354 (assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty), 354A (sexual harassment), 354D (stalking), and 506(1) (criminal intimidation). Vinod Tomar had been named as a co-accused under related sections. The prosecution contended that these offenses occurred during various events and administrative sessions involving the federation both domestically and abroad.\n\nReactions Following the Court Verdict\nExpressing relief after the acquittal was announced, Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh reiterated his stand regarding his innocence. He stated that if any charge had been proven he would have taken extreme measures, but today the court acquitted him with honor. Details regarding the court outcome were also shared on X shortly after the verdict was delivered. The ruling concludes a prolonged legal saga that had drawn widespread national attention to sports administration and athlete safety in India.\n\nWhat this means for you\n• Across India: The judgment highlights the importance of judicial evidence and procedural rigor in high-profile sports administration cases.\n• In Delhi: The Rouse Avenue Court verdict brings a definitive conclusion to a long-running legal matter tracked closely in the capital.\n\nQuestions & Answers\n\n1. Which case did the Rouse Avenue Court deliver its verdict on?\nThe court delivered its verdict on the sexual harassment case filed by female wrestlers against former WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh.\n\n2. Who was acquitted in this verdict?\nFormer WFI president Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and former assistant secretary Vinod Tomar were acquitted of all charges.\n\n3. When did Delhi Police file the chargesheet in this case?\nDelhi Police filed a 1,500-page chargesheet on June 15, 2023, after concluding its investigation.\n\n4. Which IPC sections were included in the chargesheet?\nThe chargesheet included charges under IPC Sections 354, 354A, 354D, and 506(1).",
  "url": "https://trendkia.com/en/delhi/mahila-pahalavanon-se-jure-yauna-utpirana-mamale-men-purva-wfi-pramukha-brij-bhushan-sharan-singh-sabhi-aropon-se-bari-13160",
  "category": "Delhi",
  "publishedAt": "2026-08-03",
  "tags": [
    "Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh",
    "Rouse Avenue Court",
    "Wrestling Federation of India",
    "Vinod Tomar",
    "Sexual Harassment Case",
    "Delhi Police"
  ],
  "language": "en",
  "site": "TrendKia"
}