Gujarat Police Book Congress MLA Jignesh Mevani Over Police Station Ruckus and Provocative Remarks An FIR has been registered against Gujarat Congress MLA Jignesh Mevani in Gandhinagar for obstructing police duty and amplifying provocative statements. Legal troubles have mounted for Gujarat Congress leader and legislator Jignesh Mevani following the registration of a criminal case against him in Gandhinagar district. The complaint was lodged at Pethapur police station under several serious statutory sections, accusing him of creating a disturbance inside the station premises and making inflammatory remarks during an ongoing inquiry. The Pethapur Police Station Incident According to the details set out in the First Information Report, the incident occurred on 9 October amidst election campaign activities in Gandhinagar. Police officials at Pethapur police station were in the middle of recording a statement from a Congress candidate regarding an application filed against the candidate. During this procedure, Jignesh Mevani arrived at the police station accompanied by a gathering of his supporters. The complaint states that he directly disrupted official police proceedings. Beyond creating an obstacle to duty, he allegedly deployed objectionable language and delivered fact-free, provocative assertions inside the police station. The official complaint notes that these statements were capable of inciting social discord and creating ill will within the public. Amplification on Social Media and Invoked Sections The First Information Report highlights that Jignesh Mevani did not limit these assertions to the police station alone; he actively amplified and shared them through his social media accounts with the purpose of misleading the wider public. While he had previously found himself in controversy over outspoken and provocative commentary, this case marks the first instance where formal legal action has been initiated against him over such conduct. Law enforcement authorities at Pethapur have booked the legislator under a comprehensive array of legal provisions • Section 189(2): Penalties relating to unlawful assembly. • Section 190: Imposition of joint liability for acts committed in pursuit of a common object. • Section 191(2): Punishment prescribed for committing rioting. • Section 221: Obstructing a public servant from discharging lawful duties. • Section 351(2): Penalties prescribed for criminal intimidation. • Section 352: Intentional insult designed to provoke a breach of the peace. • Section 353(1)(b): Circulating false statements or rumours calculated to generate fear or alarm among the public. • Section 353(1)(c): Disseminating false information intended to incite one community or class against another. • Section 353(2): Promoting feelings of enmity, hatred, or ill will between distinct religious, racial, linguistic, regional, or caste groups. Context of Legislative Controversies in Gujarat This action against Jignesh Mevani comes against the backdrop of other recent regulatory and procedural challenges encountered by opposition lawmakers in the state. Earlier, Congress MLA Imran Khedawala faced procedural scrutiny over an alleged insult to Vande Mataram, prompting Gujarat Legislative Assembly Speaker Shankar Chaudhary to order a rigorous probe by the Privileges Committee. What this means for you This legal development highlights the strict boundaries governing public representatives during campaign activities and police inquiries. • Across India: It reinforces the principle that holding public office does not grant immunity from laws regulating conduct inside police stations. Citizens and political figures alike are reminded that disrupting public servants during formal proceedings carries serious criminal liability. • In Gujarat: Local political campaigning in Gandhinagar and across the state is likely to witness tighter police oversight and protocol enforcement. Party workers and local leaders will face immediate legal friction if administrative operations are hindered. • For social media users: The inclusion of digital amplification charges underlines the legal peril of circulating unverified or polarizing claims online. Users must exercise caution before reposting controversial political material to avoid secondary legal exposure. • For political organizations: Campaign teams will need to institute stricter discipline regarding where supporters assemble during candidate questionings. Parties are forced to navigate investigations through official legal channels rather than gathering crowds at local stations. Why this happened The case was triggered by an intervention during official police inquiry procedures in Gandhinagar amidst active election campaigning. • Direct cause: On 9 October, while police at Pethapur were recording a statement from a Congress candidate regarding a petition, Jignesh Mevani arrived with supporters and allegedly interfered with the proceedings. • Nature of allegations: According to the complaint, objectionable language was used and inflammatory, unsubstantiated claims were made inside the premises. • Social media amplification: The police highlighted that these controversial remarks were broadcast via social media platforms to mislead the public and cause communal discord. • Escalating friction: While the legislator has previously courted controversies over provocative rhetoric, this direct confrontation at the police station prompted the first formal criminal registration against him. Questions & Answers 1. Where was the case against Jignesh Mevani registered? The FIR was registered at Pethapur police station in Gandhinagar district, Gujarat. 2. On what date did the alleged incident take place? According to the FIR, the incident occurred on 9 October during election campaign activities in Gandhinagar. 3. What are the primary charges against Mevani? He is accused of obstructing police duty, using objectionable language, delivering provocative statements, and amplifying them online. 4. What were the police doing when Mevani arrived at the station? Police officials were recording the statement of a Congress candidate regarding a complaint filed against the candidate. 5. Has Mevani faced similar legal action in the past? Although he has been involved in controversies regarding his statements earlier, this marks the first time formal legal action has been taken against him. 6. What was the previous controversy involving Imran Khedawala? Congress MLA Imran Khedawala faced an inquiry regarding an alleged disrespect to Vande Mataram, which the Assembly Speaker referred to the Privileges Committee. https://trendkia.com/en/gujarat/pethapura-pulisa-thane-men-hngama-aura-bharakau-bayanabaji-ke-aropa-men-jignesh-mevani-para-kesa-darja-46591 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.