Father and Mother Remanded in Rohtak Four-Year-Old Assault Case After Truth Emerges in Counseling Police in Rohtak, Haryana, have secured a five-day remand of both parents after a counseling session revealed the father assaulted his four-year-old daughter and falsely accused a schoolboy. A harrowing case of child abuse in the Rohtak district of Haryana has ended with the arrest of a victim's own parents. Investigators confirmed that a four-year-old girl was subjected to severe sexual assault not by an outsider, but by her own father. Following revelations uncovered during a dedicated counseling process, law enforcement authorities took both the father and the mother into custody on a five-day police remand. Preliminary police findings established that the accused father frequently watched pornographic videos. After committing the crime against his daughter, he orchestrated an elaborate attempt to shift the blame onto an underage boy studying at her school. It required nearly one and a half months of persistent investigation to unravel the fabrication. False Accusations and School Protests The episode began unfolding in mid-September when the child's mother submitted a formal police complaint on September 16, alleging that her four-year-old daughter had been assaulted. According to the mother's initial statement, swelling was noticed on the child's private parts after she returned home from school on September 15. The mother claimed in the complaint that an older schoolboy had lured the toddler into a washroom under the pretext of offering biscuits, taped her mouth, and committed the assault. Armed with these allegations, the father gathered local villagers and staged a massive protest at the school on September 17. The school principal denied that any such incident took place within the premises. Authorities subsequently scrutinized all available CCTV camera recordings from the campus, but the surveillance footage showed no evidence of any misconduct or suspicious interaction involving the child. How Suspicion Shifted to the Parents Given the sensitivity and gravity of the allegations, Meham DSP Tanuj Sharma initiated an intensive inquiry. Over the course of the investigation, the child gave two formal statements and attended two initial counseling sessions. Throughout these first two interactions, the girl repeated the name of the school student as instructed. However, CWC Rohtak Chairman Advocate Satish Kaushik observed red flags regarding the behavior of the parents. During both initial sessions, the parents repeatedly intervened, speaking over the child and answering questions on her behalf instead of allowing her to respond naturally. Truth Disclosed in Private Session Recognizing the coercive dynamic, counselors arranged a third session where the child was spoken to entirely in private, away from both parents. Without parental pressure in the room, the girl disclosed the reality, directly naming her mother and father in connection with the ordeal. The counseling team immediately briefed the police on this breakthrough. Confronted with the child's private testimony during intensive interrogation, the mother confessed to the sequence of events. She admitted that the abuse took place in her direct presence, but she actively concealed the crime and supported the fabricated complaint against the school. Upon subsequent questioning, the father also broke down and confessed to the offense, leading police to secure a five-day remand to complete the investigation. What this means for you This case underscores the critical importance of independent child counseling and rigorous evidence verification when investigating sensitive abuse complaints. • Across India: Child welfare authorities nationwide prioritize confidential, parent-free questioning when investigating potential domestic abuse cases. Families and educators must remain vigilant regarding physical or behavioral red flags in young children and utilize formal child helpline systems. • In Rohtak: Local administrative bodies and law enforcement in Haryana are enforcing stringent vetting procedures to prevent false allegations against schools. Institutions in the district continue to maintain comprehensive security measures, including functional CCTV monitoring. • For Parents and Caregivers: Whenever a child appears hesitant or overly controlled by family members during inquiry, independent psychological evaluation is essential. Prompt professional medical evaluation is crucial whenever unusual physical distress or swelling is observed. • Legal Accountability: The detention of both parents demonstrates that fabricating criminal claims and shielding perpetrators carries severe penal consequences under Indian law. Investigators will pursue strict judicial custody and formal charges against all parties involved in concealing the crime. Why this happened The case resulted from severe domestic deviance followed by a coordinated attempt by the parents to deflect criminal responsibility. • Addiction and Deviant Conduct: Preliminary police findings revealed that the father regularly consumed pornographic material, which led him to assault his four-year-old daughter at home. • Deliberate Diversion Strategy: To evade detection, the parents fabricated an allegation against an unnamed schoolboy and organized a local protest at the school to manufacture public pressure and mislead authorities. • Objective Verification Breakdown: The scheme collapsed after school surveillance camera footage showed no corroborating evidence, prompting officials to isolate the child during counseling. • Maternal Complicity: The mother witnessed the abuse firsthand but chose to conceal the reality, lodging a false police complaint that prolonged the investigation for nearly forty-five days. Questions & Answers 1. Who was found responsible for assaulting the four-year-old child in Rohtak? Police investigations confirmed that the child's biological father committed the offense. 2. What immediate legal action did the police take against the parents? Both the father and the mother were arrested and placed on a five-day police remand. 3. What initial claim was made by the parents? They alleged that a school student lured the girl into a washroom with biscuits on September 15, taped her mouth, and assaulted her. 4. Why were the accusations against the school dismissed? The school principal refuted the claim and an inspection of CCTV camera footage revealed no supporting evidence. 5. What made authorities suspicious of the parents during counseling? In the first two sessions, the parents repeatedly interrupted and spoke on behalf of the child rather than letting her answer. 6. How did the child finally reveal the truth? During a third counseling session conducted in complete isolation from her parents, the girl directly named her mother and father. https://trendkia.com/en/haryana/rohtak-men-chara-sala-ki-masuma-se-dushkarma-ke-mamale-men-pita-aura-man-rimanda-para-kaunsalinga-men-khula-sacha-49071 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.