{
  "type": "article",
  "title": "Judicial Custody for Siya Goyal and Chetan Chaudhary as Coded Chats Deepen Ketan Agarwal Murder Probe",
  "summary": "A year-old phone recovered from Siya Goyal's home and coded chats laced with nicknames have added a new twist to the Ketan Agarwal murder case in Pune. The court rejected the plea for extended police custody and sent both Siya Goyal and Chetan Chaudhary to judicial custody instead.",
  "content": "Accused Siya Goyal and Chetan Chaudhary were produced before a court in the Ketan Agarwal murder case, where the prosecution sought an extension of their police custody to carry the investigation forward. During the hearing before JMFC A. M. Vibhute, government pleader Advocate Rajshree Veerkud argued that investigators had recovered a mobile phone, roughly a year old, from Siya Goyal's house.\n\nDeleted Data Recovered From Phones\nThe device predates the handset the accused was using more recently, and investigators believe it may hold conversations relevant to the case. According to the prosecution, deleted data has also been retrieved from the accused's current mobile phone. Several of the recovered chats are said to contain code words and nicknames, and the prosecution argued that decoding these exchanges, and questioning the accused about them, requires further and thorough investigation. Investigators maintain that the probe cannot move ahead without first understanding the intent hidden behind this coded conversation.\n\nFive Grounds Cited By Police\nGovernment pleader Advocate Vipul Dushing told the court that the police had placed five separate grounds before it in support of the demand for extended custody. The prosecution maintained that understanding the meaning of the alleged coded conversations, and questioning the accused based on the digital evidence recovered from them, would directly help move the investigation forward and close gaps that remain in the case.\n\nDefence Calls It a Fishing Inquiry\nThe defence strongly opposed the police's demand, telling the court that the investigating agency was merely conducting a fishing inquiry in the hope of finding fresh evidence. It argued that after 12 days of police custody, no further remand could be sought without concrete and specific grounds, and that vague references to coded chats were not enough to justify extending detention. The defence also contended that asking the accused to explain the alleged code names and nicknames found in the chats, in a manner that would force them to testify against themselves, went against the protection available under Article 20 of the Indian Constitution.\n\nCourt Sends Both To Judicial Custody\nThe prosecution reiterated that further police custody would directly aid the investigation and was essential to complete the pending probe. After hearing detailed arguments from both sides, the court sent both accused, Siya Goyal and Chetan Chaudhary, to judicial custody.\n\nThe Case So Far\nPune businessman Ketan Agarwal was murdered at Lohagad Fort, and his fiancee Siya Goyal and her lover Chetan have been accused of the killing. Police have been continuously interrogating both of them since their arrest, and after 12 days in police custody, they currently remain in judicial custody as the investigation continues.\n\nWhat this means for you\n• Across India: The case highlights how police build evidence from phone data and chats in a high-profile murder investigation, and how courts weigh an accused person's constitutional protection against self-incrimination under Article 20.\n• In Pune: Locally, the case remains linked to the landmark Lohagad Fort, and residents following the high-profile matter will be watching the next stage of proceedings now that both accused have been moved to judicial custody.\n\nQuestions & Answers\n\n1. Where was Ketan Agarwal murdered?\nPune businessman Ketan Agarwal was murdered at Lohagad Fort.\n\n2. Who are the main accused in the case?\nKetan Agarwal's fiancee Siya Goyal and her lover Chetan Chaudhary are the main accused in the case.\n\n3. What did police recover from Siya Goyal's house?\nPolice recovered a mobile phone, roughly a year old, from Siya Goyal's house, and also retrieved deleted data from the accused's current mobile phone.\n\n4. What did investigators find notable in the recovered chats?\nThe chats allegedly contain code words and nicknames, and investigators say thorough probing is needed to understand their meaning.\n\n5. How many grounds did police present in court for extending custody?\nGovernment pleader Advocate Vipul Dushing presented a total of five grounds before the court.\n\n6. Why did the defence oppose extending police custody?\nThe defence called it a fishing inquiry, argued that no further remand could be sought after 12 days without concrete grounds, and said it would violate the accused's rights under Article 20 of the Constitution.\n\n7. What did the court finally decide?\nAfter hearing both sides, the court sent both Siya Goyal and Chetan Chaudhary to judicial custody.",
  "url": "https://trendkia.com/en/investigations/siya-goyal-aura-chetan-chaudhary-ko-nyayika-hirasata-chaita-men-mile-koda-vardsa-ne-ulajhai-jancha-4426",
  "category": "Investigations",
  "publishedAt": "2026-07-03",
  "tags": [
    "Ketan Agarwal murder case",
    "Siya Goyal",
    "Chetan Chaudhary",
    "Lohagad Fort",
    "judicial custody",
    "Pune murder case",
    "coded chats",
    "police custody"
  ],
  "language": "en",
  "site": "TrendKia"
}