# Leh Liquor Traders Confront Sonam Wangchuk Over Moral Double Standards on Alcohol Policy

> Licensed hospitality and beverage merchants in Ladakh have accused environmental campaigner Sonam Wangchuk of hypocrisy, citing his simultaneous backing of prohibition, traditional brews, and an allegedly unmonitored family resort wine business.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Jammu & Kashmir · **Published:** 2026-11-01 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/jammu-kashmir/leh-men-sharaba-vyapariyon-ne-sonam-wangchuk-ke-rukha-para-uthae-savala-parivarika-risorta-aura-parnparika-peya-para-lagae-dohare--54404 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Sonam Wangchuk, Ladakh, Leh, Liquor Policy, Liquor Traders, Excise, Uleytokpo

A sharp conflict has broken out in the Union Territory of Ladakh regarding local liquor commerce and excise regulations. Commercial hospitality operators and retail alcohol merchants in Leh have openly challenged prominent climate campaigner Sonam Wangchuk, arguing that his activism on alcohol prohibition applies selective moral standards while directly threatening legitimate, tax-paying enterprises across the high-altitude region.

## Trade Associations Call Out Contradictory Stances
The controversy reached a boiling point on October 31, when the All Ladakh Hotels and Bars Association alongside the All Ladakh Liquor Traders Association convened a joint media briefing in Leh. The conference saw full attendance, with all 60 registered members present to voice collective frustration against what they characterized as targeted economic hostility disguised as social reform.

Association spokespersons pointed directly to Wangchuk's presence on October 28 at NDS Memorial Park in Leh, where women linked with regional faith-based groups had organized a multi-day sit-in demanding a complete ban on alcoholic beverages to create a dry Ladakh. The demonstration had entered its third or fourth continuous day when Wangchuk took a seat among the demonstrators. However, his remarks during the gathering sparked immediate outrage across the merchant community.

While demonstrating in favor of a dry territory, Wangchuk mounted an explicit defense of Chang, the indigenous Ladakhi beverage brewed from barley and grain. Describing it as a cornerstone of ancestral heritage, he characterized Chang as a healthier and superior alternative to factory-bottled liquor. Furthermore, Wangchuk urged authorities to assist local youths in establishing modern microbreweries with tax exemptions to brew traditional spirits, while simultaneously demanding punitive taxation on commercial liquor stores to price ordinary consumers out of the market.

## The Uleytokpo Resort and Homemade Wine Allegations
Business owners rejected this line of reasoning, questioning why commercial alcohol is framed as destructive while artisanal alcohol is promoted as wholesome. In a pointed rebuttal, the merchants brought scrutiny to Wangchuk's own domestic backyard in the riverside settlement of Uleytokpo, located along the Indus River, which serves as the activist's ancestral birthplace.

The traders highlighted that Wangchuk's family owns and manages the Uley Ethnic Resort in the village. According to evidence presented by the association during their briefing, Wangchuk's brother produces and serves unmonitored alcohol branded as Uley Tokpo Apple Homemade Wine alongside other locally pressed fruit beverages. The union stated that these operations function without standard commercial licensing, evading the rigid excise protocols, periodic safety inspections, and mandatory fees imposed on regular vendors.

Association leaders openly questioned why commercial bar owners face constant scrutiny and moral prohibition campaigns when an unlicensed beverage venture linked to an outspoken activist's family operates without administrative interference. They formally called on the Union Territory administration to explain its inaction against the Uley brand and demanded equal regulatory accountability.

## Revenue Contributions and Multi-Community Ownership
The assembled hotel and bar owners underscored the substantial financial role their establishments play within Ladakh's fragile economy. According to official association figures, legal liquor vendors and associated hospitality operations contribute between 112 crore and 115 crore rupees annually in excise and commercial taxes to the public treasury.

Merchants warned that Wangchuk is using populist prohibition rhetoric to generate public attention and political leverage at the expense of ordinary working citizens. They emphasized that the trade is fundamentally inclusive, operated by proprietors representing Muslim, Buddhist, Christian, and Hindu backgrounds across Ladakh. The associations rejected any attempt to pigeonhole the liquor business as an isolated cultural or sectarian practice.

The brief highlighted the immediate financial peril faced by newly registered businesses. Several license holders invested substantial sums of money running into lakhs of rupees to secure official permits, acquire compliant commercial real estate, and stock regulated inventory. In multiple instances, new ventures had been operational for less than thirty days, leaving entrepreneurs exposed to crippling debt if arbitrary curbs take effect.

## Accusations of Selective Environmental Activism
Addressing Wangchuk's global standing as an environmental advocate, association members questioned the selective boundaries of his public campaigns. They argued that if the preservation of traditional values and ecological health is the genuine priority, then the discussion cannot remain restricted to licensed alcohol alone.

Speakers pointed out that narcotics, processed tobacco, and intensive commercial meat consumption are equally non-traditional in Ladakhi history, with the meat trade placing profound demands on ecological systems. Despite these parallels, merchants noted, the environmental activist has maintained total silence regarding the carbon and environmental consequences of the livestock and meat industries. The association stated that if the government decides to impose sweeping prohibitions on narcotics, cigarettes, and commercial meat, licensed traders would willingly accept a complete ban on liquor, but single-target moral policing would no longer be tolerated.

## Excise Policy Background and Administrative Clarifications
The trade confrontation follows days of public sparring between Wangchuk and the local government. On October 22, during a press conference at Ladakh Bhawan in New Delhi, Wangchuk had accused the regional government of flooding the region with liquor outlets situated uncomfortably close to residential neighborhoods and educational campuses. He followed those statements with posts on X directed at Lieutenant Governor V.K. Saxena, alleging that the administration was answering drug abuse with an avalanche of liquor.

Ladakh administrative officials firmly rebuffed those claims, describing them as baseless misinformation deliberately circulated without factual backing. The administration clarified that across the entire Union Territory, exactly one standalone retail liquor outlet operates. Furthermore, following a meeting between community representatives and Lieutenant Governor Saxena, the proposed excise policy for the 2026-27 cycle had already been formally revoked back on August 26. With commercial establishments having demonstrated their tax compliance and economic vulnerability, the 60 members of the trade association issued a firm warning to Wangchuk to desist from jeopardizing lawful livelihood activities.

## What this means for you
This dispute directly impacts regulatory stability, hospitality operations, and public revenues across Ladakh.

- **Across India:** Travelers visiting Ladakh may encounter shifting availability and pricing within commercial hospitality and dining establishments. Sudden local restrictions can influence tourist spending and itinerary costs during peak travel windows.
- **In Ladakh:** Over 60 licensed hotel and bar owners face immediate commercial uncertainty affecting an estimated 112 to 115 crore rupees in annual public revenue. Small entrepreneurs who recently spent lakhs on licenses and premises risk severe financial distress.
- **For Local Employment:** Hospitality workers representing diverse regional communities face job vulnerability amid regulatory friction. Ambiguity over retail liquor operations threatens commercial stability for allied hospitality supply chains.
- **For Artisan Brewers:** Homemade wine makers and rural brewers could soon face formal inspection and licensing crackdowns. Increased regulatory scrutiny might eliminate informal fruit wine sales across heritage retreats.

## Why this happened
The confrontation arose when Sonam Wangchuk backed an alcohol prohibition sit-in while simultaneously demanding tax exemptions for traditional brews. Licensed traders viewed this as an attack on their legal businesses and responded by scrutinizing his family's unlicensed hospitality operations.

- **Direct Trigger:** On October 28, Wangchuk joined a prohibition protest in Leh but defended traditional Chang liquor and lobbied for tax-free microbreweries. Commercial merchants viewed this stance as blatant duplicity against law-abiding businesses.
- **The Family Business Dispute:** The trade association claimed Wangchuk's family resort in Uleytokpo serves unlicensed homemade apple wine without regulatory checks. This prompted business owners to challenge his moral authority on excise policy.
- **Prior Policy Friction:** Wangchuk previously alleged on October 22 that authorities were recklessly expanding alcohol access near schools. The administration denied this, highlighting that the 2026-27 draft policy had already been withdrawn on August 26.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. Who did Ladakh liquor traders accuse of double standards?
Ladakh liquor traders and the hotel association accused environmental activist Sonam Wangchuk of adopting contradictory stances on regional alcohol regulations.

### 2. When and where was the traders' press conference held?
The briefing took place on October 31 in Leh, attended by all 60 registered members of the All Ladakh Hotels and Bars Association.

### 3. What allegation was made regarding Wangchuk's family resort?
Traders alleged that Wangchuk's family resort in Uleytokpo manufactures and sells unlicensed homemade apple wine without mandatory excise permits.

### 4. What did Wangchuk propose regarding traditional alcohol during the protest?
He defended traditional Chang as cultural heritage and recommended tax exemptions for local microbreweries while seeking steep taxes on commercial shops.

### 5. How much annual tax do licensed liquor vendors pay in Ladakh?
According to the trade association, licensed hotel and bar operators contribute between 112 crore and 115 crore rupees annually in taxes.

### 6. What did the administration clarify regarding retail shops and the excise policy?
The administration clarified that only one liquor store operates in Ladakh and that the 2026-27 excise policy had already been withdrawn on August 26.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._