# Sahibganj Voter Revision Uncovers Identity Dual-Registration Linked to Identical Aadhaar Number

> During Jharkhand's Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Sahibganj, officials uncovered two distinct identity cards bearing the same Aadhaar number. Chief Electoral Officer K. Ravi Kumar has initiated an inquiry into the matter.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Jharkhand · **Published:** 2026-10-31 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/jharkhand/sahibganj-men-vishesha-gahana-punarikshana-ke-daurana-khuli-pola-eka-hi-aadhaar-snkhya-para-darja-mile-do-alaga-nama-53925 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Jharkhand News, Sahibganj, Barhait, Aadhaar Card, Voter List, K Ravi Kumar

A serious document verification anomaly has surfaced during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in the Sahibganj district of Jharkhand. In the Barhait block, administrative scrutiny revealed identity documents registered under two separate names for what appears to be the same individual. Crucially, both document sets feature the exact same unique Aadhaar number. In older records, the woman is listed as Mita Devi, whereas newer paperwork identifies her as Fatima Bibi. Following a formal grievance regarding this duplication, state election authorities have ordered a comprehensive probe.

## Marital History and Identity Transition
According to the case details and background information, Mita Devi originally hails from the Godda district. In the year 2012, she entered into matrimony with Pritam Kumar Chandra, a resident of Barmasia located in the Barhait block of Sahibganj. As per the allegations outlined in the official complaint, she subsequently contracted a second marriage with Nazrul Ansari. Following this alliance, her name was officially recorded as Fatima Bibi. The complaint asserts that separate sets of legal and civil documents were systematically procured under both identities.

## Identical Aadhaar Figures Expose Documentation Discrepancy
The discrepancy came to light precisely because the unique identifier failed to diverge across both documentation profiles. Both cards, bearing the names Mita Devi and Fatima Bibi respectively, displayed the identical Aadhaar number. To support the inquiry, the complainant submitted copies of both Aadhaar cards along with PAN cards and associated identification records. The complaint further alleges that a falsified family pedigree or genealogy certificate was fabricated to legitimize the newly assumed identity for official records.

## Genealogy Register Used for Electoral Enrolment
During the ongoing voter list revision exercise, the individual was mapped to the household of Nejamuddin Momin. A formal family pedigree certificate was subsequently drafted, portraying Fatima Bibi as one of Nejamuddin Momin's six children. Scrutiny revealed that this genealogy document carried the verification signatures of the local village head as well as relevant revenue officials. It is alleged that this approved family lineage was deployed as the foundational proof to secure an entry on the voter register.

## Chief Electoral Officer Mandates Formal Investigation
Addressing the gravity of the irregularity, Jharkhand Chief Electoral Officer K. Ravi Kumar directed administrative authorities to conduct an exhaustive inquiry into the entire sequence of events. The senior official noted that complaints had been received regarding illicit enrollments in the voter register within Barhait. He confirmed that two Aadhaar cards belonging to a single woman had emerged, both reflecting an identical registration number. The investigation into the lineage certificates and supporting records will establish the administrative level at which the lapses occurred and pinpoint the individuals accountable.

## What this means for you
This incident is likely to prompt stricter scrutiny and tighter verification norms for voter registrations linked with identity documents.

- **Across India:** The Election Commission and civil documentation authorities may intensify scrutiny when cross-checking identification records against family genealogies. Stricter data reconciliation protocols could be mandated to detect duplicate identities linked to identical Aadhaar numbers nationwide.
- **In Sahibganj:** Residents undergoing electoral roll revisions in Barhait and adjacent blocks will likely face enhanced scrutiny of supporting lineage documents. Legitimate applicants seeking name or address corrections may experience prolonged document verification timelines.
- **Administrative Oversight:** Protocols regarding village head and revenue officer validations for genealogy registers are expected to be overhauled. Administrative personnel endorsing unverified family trees will face greater legal and procedural accountability.
- **Legal Implications:** Procuring duplicate civil documentation under altered names with an identical UID number invites strict legal prosecution for fraud. Both the individuals holding duplicate credentials and facilitators issuing fraudulent pedigrees risk statutory penalties.

## Why this happened
This development was caused by personal identity alterations, the procurement of duplicate records, and lapses during administrative genealogy certification.

- **Documentation Discrepancy:** Following a change of name and a second marriage, separate identity credentials were created under both original and altered names. Because both cards retained the exact same unique Aadhaar number, the duplicate identity was instantly flagged upon comparative inspection.
- **Fabricated Lineage Validation:** To facilitate inclusion in the local voter rolls, a genealogy certificate was generated mapping the woman as one of the six children of Nejamuddin Momin. The document successfully obtained endorsement signatures from local revenue functionaries and the village head without adequate field verification.
- **Detection During Special Review:** The irregularity was caught during the procedural cross-matching of family trees under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) drive. A formal complaint backed by physical copies of the conflicting cards prompted senior election officials to initiate an investigation.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. What discrepancy was uncovered during the voter list revision in Sahibganj?
In Barhait, two identity cards under the names Mita Devi and Fatima Bibi were discovered bearing the exact same Aadhaar number.

### 2. How did the change in identity from Mita Devi to Fatima Bibi occur?
As per the complaint, after an initial 2012 marriage, she entered into a second marriage with Nazrul Ansari and changed her name.

### 3. What method was used to enroll the new identity into the electoral roll?
A genealogy certificate was drafted listing her among the six children of Nejamuddin Momin, bearing local official endorsements.

### 4. What action has been ordered by the election authorities?
Jharkhand Chief Electoral Officer K. Ravi Kumar has ordered a comprehensive investigation into the documentation and family lineage records.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._