# Karnataka High Court Sets Up SIT Under IPS Alok Kumar to Probe KPSC Recruitment Irregularities

> A dedicated Special Investigation Team has been formed under senior police officer Alok Kumar to look into KPSC recruitment irregularities. The High Court directed all evidence to be transferred and sought a final report within 100 days.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Karnataka · **Published:** 2026-09-21 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/karnataka/kpsc-bharti-dhandhali-ki-paratala-ke-lie-vishesha-jancha-dala-taiyara-alok-kumar-snbhalenge-kamana-35833 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** KPSC, Alok Kumar, Karnataka High Court, Recruitment Scam, SIT Probe, CID Karnataka

A judicial intervention has reshaped the inquiry into widespread irregularities linked to the Karnataka Public Service Commission recruitment test. Justice M Nagaprasanna, presiding over a single judge bench, issued a direct order establishing an independent Special Investigation Team to probe the recruitment scam. The responsibility of spearheading this high-profile investigation has been placed on senior IPS officer Alok Kumar, signaling a decisive step toward uncovering procedural lapses and illegalities within administrative appointments.

## Transfer of Case Evidence From CID and Local Police
To preserve complete objectivity and eliminate potential conflicts, the court deemed a fresh investigative setup essential. The Criminal Investigation Department, alongside local jurisdictional police stations previously handling the files, must immediately hand over all case diaries, gathered materials, and supporting evidence to the newly constituted team. Furthermore, the bench instructed all public authorities and governmental departments to extend full logistical and administrative backing to the investigators throughout the exercise.

## Strict 100-Day Timeline With Regular Progress Milestones
The bench established an uncompromising timetable to ensure that the inquiry proceeds without administrative delay. The Special Investigation Team must file its conclusive status report before the court within 100 days of taking over the case records. Additionally, to maintain active judicial oversight, the team must submit an interim progress report every 30 days, keeping the court informed of key developments as the investigation unfolds.

## Criminal Petitions Filed by Accused Put on Hold
Following the initial registration of cases, several accused persons had approached the court seeking the quashing of first information reports and related legal proceedings against them. The court refused immediate relief, clarifying that none of these criminal petitions will be entertained until the investigation team submits its formal report. Any consideration of legal reprieve will depend strictly on the factual findings presented at the end of the inquiry.

## What this means for you
The judicial order establishes a firm precedent for accountability and transparency in public service recruitment.

- **Across India:** The move reinforces judicial scrutiny over public service exams and sets a benchmark for addressing recruitment irregularities nationwide. It highlights how high courts can intervene directly to ensure independent oversight in state administrative testing.
- **In Karnataka:** Thousands of local job seekers can expect clarity on the disputed recruitment process within the stipulated 100-day window. The transfer of evidence to an independent team led by a senior IPS officer aims to eliminate administrative interference.
- **For Candidates:** Aspirants caught in recruitment limbo will gain clearer visibility as monthly progress reports are filed before the court. This structured timeline allows candidates to track the genuine status of the examination process.
- **For the Accused:** Legal bids by named accused to quash FIRs stand halted until the final findings are presented to the bench. No relief will be considered until the investigative team formalizes its conclusions within the given deadline.

## Why this happened
The high court stepped in after serious irregularities compromised the integrity of the state public service recruitment process.

- **Allegations of Malpractice:** Substantial procedural flaws and irregularities surfaced during the conduct of the recruitment test. These issues prompted widespread concern over the fairness and legitimacy of candidate selections.
- **Need for Impartiality:** The court determined that ensuring an unbiased outcome required an independent investigative unit rather than routine police processing. This led to shifting the case files away from local stations and previous investigators into the hands of a specialized team.
- **Enforcing Accountability:** To prevent the matter from lingering indefinitely, the bench imposed a 100-day deadline alongside mandatory monthly reviews. This structure ensures steady progress and keeps the investigative team directly accountable to the judiciary.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. Who is heading the newly formed SIT?
Senior IPS officer Alok Kumar has been appointed to lead the special investigation.

### 2. What is the deadline set by the High Court for the final report?
The investigation team must submit its final status report within 100 days of taking over the case.

### 3. Does the SIT need to provide periodic updates to the court?
Yes, the court has directed the team to present a progress report every 30 days.

### 4. What happened to the petitions filed by the accused to quash FIRs?
The court decided not to hear any of these criminal petitions until the investigation team submits its formal report.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._