# Bombay High Court Pauses Sachin Waze Bail Order Until October 7 Following Urgent Appeal by NIA > The Bombay High Court has put a temporary hold on the bail granted to Sachin Waze in the Antilia bomb scare case, directing jail authorities to halt his release pending an October 7 hearing. **Type:** article · **Category:** Maharashtra · **Published:** 2026-09-30 · **Source:** TrendKia **Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/maharashtra/sachin-waze-ki-rihai-para-bombay-high-court-ne-breka-lagaya-nia-ki-arji-para-jamanata-7-aktubara-taka-ataki-40406 · **Language:** English **Tags:** Sachin Waze, Bombay High Court, NIA, Antilia Case, Mukesh Ambani, Mansukh Hiren, Mumbai Police The legal reprieve granted to dismissed police officer Sachin Waze has hit an immediate roadblock after the Bombay High Court stayed the special session court order that had granted him bail in the high-profile Antilia security scare case. Acting on an urgent petition moved by the National Investigation Agency, the high court ordered an interim stay on the bail order until October 7, ensuring that Waze remains behind bars for the immediate future as the legal challenge unfolds. ## Investigative Challenge and Multiple Judicial Recusals The development followed swift procedural maneuvers after a special NIA court cleared Sachin Waze for bail. Moving quickly on Tuesday, the National Investigation Agency approached the Bombay High Court to challenge that relief, seeking an immediate freeze on the release orders. However, the legal proceedings encountered procedural complications when Justice Sarang Kotwal recused himself from the matter and declined to entertain the agency's plea. Following this initial hurdle, the federal anti-terror agency presented its petition before a bench presided over by Justice Bharati Dangre. On Wednesday, the matter came up formally before the division bench comprising Justice Bharati Dangre and Justice Ashish Chavan. Yet this bench also chose not to hear the petition. The recusal stemmed from past legal associations: Justice Ashish Chavan had earlier represented the Central Bureau of Investigation as its legal counsel, while Justice Bharati Dangre had previously presided over court hearings involving political leaders in connected matters linked to Sachin Waze. ## Chief Justice Steps In as Division Bench Directs Jail Authorities Faced with recusals from two separate benches, representatives from the NIA took the matter directly to the Chief Justice, seeking urgent intervention and administrative assignment for immediate orders. Acting on instructions from the Chief Justice, the plea was transferred to the bench of Justice Girish Kulkarni and Justice Nila Gokhale for consideration. When the afternoon hearing commenced, nobody appeared to represent Sachin Waze in the courtroom. After evaluating the agency's urgent plea, the Bombay High Court ordered an interim stay on Waze's bail until October 7. Crucially, the bench directed that the stay order be communicated immediately to prison officials, thereby preventing Waze from completing release formalities and walking out of custody. The high court has scheduled the subsequent hearing for October 7. ## Core Allegations Behind the Antilia Investigation The litigation traces back to the high-stakes security alert triggered when an SUV laden with explosive materials was discovered abandoned near Antilia, the Mumbai residence of industrialist Mukesh Ambani. The case escalated dramatically soon afterwards following the death of businessman Mansukh Hiren, who was associated with the vehicle. The twin incidents created an unprecedented uproar across the country and sparked intense political turmoil within Maharashtra. The National Investigation Agency stepped in to take over the probe and subsequently arrested Sachin Waze in connection with the recovery of explosives and the suspicious demise of Mansukh Hiren. In the wake of his arrest and the gravity of the allegations, Mumbai Police dismissed Waze from official service. While the special court had briefly offered him bail, the high court's intervention has once again placed his release in abeyance pending full legal scrutiny. ## What this means for you The judicial stay underscores the swift appellate mechanisms in place when federal agencies challenge release orders in high-profile criminal cases. - **In Maharashtra:** The decision directly affects the ongoing legal trajectory of one of the state's most prominent criminal controversies. The immediate communication to jail authorities ensures that the accused remains in custody until at least October 7. - **Across India:** The ruling demonstrates the strict oversight superior courts exercise over bail matters involving central probe agencies and sensitive security probes. Observers see that securing lower court bail does not guarantee release if federal prosecutors seek emergency intervention. - **Legal Precedent:** The swift transfer across benches highlights procedural transparency when judges recuse themselves due to past conflicts. Litigants must anticipate rapid administrative intervention by Chief Justices in high-priority matters. - **Upcoming Schedule:** With the interim pause lasting until October 7, the parties will prepare for a contested hearing on that date. The court will then determine whether the stay continues or further arguments are required. ## Why this happened The interim stay was triggered by an urgent legal push by the National Investigation Agency to prevent the immediate release of the accused following a trial court's relief. - **Special Court Bail Order:** A special court had initially granted bail to Sachin Waze in the case. The anti-terror agency opposed this decision and immediately mounted an appellate challenge. - **Urgent Legal Move:** The NIA moved the Bombay High Court to obtain an immediate stay on the bail order. The agency sought to prevent the execution of release formalities. - **Consecutive Recusals:** Two successive benches stepped aside due to prior professional engagements with the CBI and past hearings involving connected political matters. This led the Chief Justice to assign the case to a third bench for urgent consideration. - **Absence of Representation:** When the matter was taken up in the afternoon session, no legal counsel appeared on behalf of Waze. Under these circumstances, the division bench granted interim relief to the agency until October 7. ## Questions & Answers ### 1. What order did the Bombay High Court pass regarding Sachin Waze? The Bombay High Court placed an interim stay on Sachin Waze's bail order until October 7. ### 2. Which court had originally granted bail to Sachin Waze? A special NIA court had passed the order granting bail to Sachin Waze. ### 3. Which judges recused themselves from hearing the NIA petition? Justice Sarang Kotwal recused himself first, followed by the division bench of Justice Bharati Dangre and Justice Ashish Chavan. ### 4. Which bench ordered the interim stay on Waze's release? The division bench comprising Justice Girish Kulkarni and Justice Nila Gokhale issued the stay order. ### 5. What are the core allegations against Sachin Waze? He was arrested by the NIA in connection with an explosives-laden vehicle parked near Mukesh Ambani's residence Antilia and the death of businessman Mansukh Hiren. ### 6. When is the next court hearing scheduled? The next hearing in the case is scheduled before the Bombay High Court on October 7. --- _TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._