# Maulana Mushtaq Malik Raises Objections to Proposed Maharashtra Conversion Law, Citing Conflicts with Sharia Inheritance Rules

> Tehreek Muslim Shabban president Maulana Mushtaq Malik has raised concerns over the proposed anti-conversion law in Maharashtra, warning that its inheritance clauses clash with Sharia rules.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Maharashtra · **Published:** 2026-08-19 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/maharashtra/maharashtra-ke-dharmantarana-kanuna-para-maulana-mushtaq-malik-ne-uthae-savala-sharia-ke-virasata-niyamon-se-takarava-ki-di-chetav-18260 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Maharashtra Conversion Law, Maulana Mushtaq Malik, Sharia Inheritance Law, Love Jihad Controversy, Tehreek Muslim Shabban, Allahabad High Court

Serious concerns have emerged regarding the provisions of the proposed law targeting forced religious conversions in Maharashtra. Maulana Mushtaq Malik, president of Tehreek Muslim Shabban, has questioned several clauses in the proposed legislation, raising apprehensions over their potential misuse. He emphasized that religious conversion is strictly a matter of an individual's personal belief, conscience, and thought process, where forced external interference should have no place. Furthermore, he strongly opposed categorizing marriages or conversions between individuals of different faiths under the label of 'Love Jihad'.

## Objections to Inheritance Clauses and Sharia Conflict
Maulana Mushtaq Malik pointed out that similar legislation has been introduced in various formats across different BJP-ruled states. He raised specific objections to clauses concerning the religious identity of children born following a conversion and their inheritance rights over property. According to him, if forced conversion is proven in a particular case and a child is born, granting custody of the child to the mother is not objectionable in itself. However, if the legislation mandates making such a child an heir to property belonging to both parents' families, it directly conflicts with Islamic inheritance laws established under Sharia.

## Legal Ambiguity and the Risk of Misuse
Elaborating on fundamental religious principles, the Maulana stated that a person's faith is deeply rooted in their internal convictions and personal choices. No individual can be compelled to adopt a specific religious faith against their will. He highlighted that Islam itself strictly forbids forced religious conversions. Warning against vague wording in the legislation, he stated that any ambiguity within the law could be exploited to pressure individuals and target people unfairly. Decisions related to personal preference and religious belief should never be converted into criminal offenses based merely on suspicion or social pressure.

## Judicial Precedents and Constitutional Protections
To substantiate his position, Maulana Malik cited a past ruling by the Allahabad High Court involving two adult sisters who had converted and married out of their own free will. He noted that the court had prioritized their legal adulthood and reaffirmed their constitutional right to make independent personal choices, even penalizing the opposing parties in that case. Expressing strong objection to the term 'Love Jihad', he stated that love and jihad are two entirely distinct concepts, making it inappropriate to label every interfaith marriage on religious grounds alone. When two consenting adults choose to marry, the matter should be viewed strictly through the lens of their constitutional rights rather than being turned into a political issue. He concluded that politicizing sensitive social topics like religious conversion and interfaith marriage damages the broader fabric of society.

## What this means for you
**Across India:** The debate around anti-conversion laws may intensify discussions on personal liberty, individual choices, and constitutional rights.

**In Maharashtra:** Residents could see significant legal and social implications regarding rules on interfaith marriages, conversion regulations, and child inheritance rights.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. What objection did Maulana Mushtaq Malik raise against Maharashtra's proposed law?
Maulana Mushtaq Malik stated that provisions regarding children's property inheritance post-conversion could conflict with Sharia inheritance rules and warned that legal ambiguity might lead to misuse.

### 2. Where does the conflict between Sharia law and the proposed bill arise according to the statement?
According to the Maulana, while giving child custody to the mother is not objectionable, making the child an heir to property from both sides directly conflicts with Sharia rules.

### 3. What stance did the Maulana take on the term 'Love Jihad'?
Maulana Malik stated that love and jihad are completely separate concepts and argued that it is inappropriate to label consensual interfaith marriages between adults as 'Love Jihad'.

### 4. Which Allahabad High Court case did Maulana Mushtaq Malik refer to?
He referred to a case involving two adult sisters who converted and married, where the court upheld their constitutional right to choose as adults and fined the opposing parties.

### 5. Does Islam permit forced religious conversion?
According to Maulana Mushtaq Malik, Islam strictly forbids forcing anyone to convert, as faith is entirely a matter of personal thought and conviction.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._