# JNU Dismisses Manipur MP Bimol Akoijam from Professorship Over Sexual Harassment Allegations

> Jawaharlal Nehru University has immediately dismissed Congress MP and Professor Angomcha Bimol Akoijam following an internal inquiry into sexual harassment allegations filed by 11 female students.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Manipur · **Published:** 2026-10-09 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/manipur/jnu-ne-manipur-sansada-bimol-akoijam-ko-prophesara-pada-se-kiya-barkhasta-11-chhatraon-ne-lagae-the-gnbhira-aropa-45515 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Jawaharlal Nehru University, Bimol Akoijam, Manipur MP, Sexual Harassment, Higher Education, Disciplinary Action

Jawaharlal Nehru University has dismissed Professor Angomcha Bimol Akoijam, a Congress MP from Manipur, with immediate effect following an inquiry conducted by the institution's Internal Committee into allegations of sexual harassment lodged by 11 female students. Akoijam was a faculty member at the Centre for the Study of Social Systems within the School of Social Sciences.

## Internal Inquiry Findings and Administrative Order
The university order, dated October 9 and issued under the signature of Vice-Chancellor Santishree D Pandit, detailed the trajectory of the disciplinary action. Following the submission of allegations concerning inappropriate conduct, the administration referred the complaints directly to its Internal Committee for formal scrutiny. After concluding its review of the facts and witness accounts, the panel recommended the imposition of a major penalty against the faculty member.

The administrative document affirmed that the institution followed established procedures before reaching its verdict. Upon reviewing the available evidence and the findings submitted in the inquiry report, university authorities determined that immediate termination from service was the appropriate outcome.

## Statutory Framework and Service Rules Invoked
The formal order cited specific statutory guidelines to underpin the dismissal, noting that the Internal Committee recommended major punishment in accordance with institutional service regulations, specifically referencing UGC provision F.91-1/2013 (TFGS)/10(1). This regulatory benchmark mandates decisive disciplinary consequences against educational personnel found culpable of sexual misconduct.

Furthermore, the university invoked Rule 11(ix) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules to execute the penalty. Under the framework of Rule 11(ix) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, removal from service is formally classified as a dismissal that typically disqualifies the individual from securing future employment within government institutions.

## Nature of Allegations Brought by Students
The inquiry originated from formal accusations submitted by 11 female students who detailed recurring incidents of objectionable conduct. The allegations described inappropriate statements during classroom lectures, unwanted advances during group gatherings, and misconduct throughout academic interactions. With the formal signing of the order, Akoijam's dismissal from the university faculty has taken effect immediately.

## What this means for you
This decision underscores institutional accountability regarding workplace misconduct and reinforces campus safety protocols across higher education institutions.

- **Campus Safety:** Decisive action taken by internal committees enhances student confidence when reporting serious misconduct on university campuses. It establishes that formal complaints are scrutinized regardless of a faculty member's profile.
- **Administrative Accountability:** Enforcing strict UGC norms and Central Civil Services rules outlines clear boundaries for professional conduct among academic staff. Institutions are increasingly compelled to adhere strictly to formal disciplinary procedures.
- **Student Protections:** The development highlights the importance of functioning grievance mechanisms to address inappropriate interactions in academic settings. It ensures that students have formal channels to seek institutional redress.
- **Government Service Precedents:** Invoking Rule 11(ix) of the CCS (CCA) Rules creates significant legal barriers regarding future public sector employment. This reinforces the statutory consequences tied to major disciplinary findings.

## Why this happened
This dismissal took place after the university's Internal Committee concluded a formal inquiry into complaints filed by 11 female students and submitted its recommendations.

- **Formal Student Complaints:** Eleven students accused the faculty member of making inappropriate remarks in classrooms, unwarranted advances during gatherings, and misconduct during academic interactions. These grievances prompted the administration to initiate an official probe.
- **Internal Committee Inquiry:** The university panel reviewed the available evidence, evaluated testimonies, and completed due process in line with institutional norms. Based on its findings, the committee advised the imposition of a major penalty.
- **Statutory Rule Enforcement:** University authorities acted upon the committee's report by invoking UGC disciplinary provisions alongside CCS (CCA) Rule 11(ix). These legal frameworks specifically require dismissal from service in substantiated cases of sexual misconduct.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. Which faculty member has been dismissed by JNU?
The university dismissed Professor Angomcha Bimol Akoijam, who was affiliated with the Centre for the Study of Social Systems and is a Congress MP from Manipur.

### 2. What were the allegations leveled against the professor?
Eleven female students accused him of inappropriate classroom remarks, unwanted advances at gatherings, and misconduct during academic interactions.

### 3. When was the dismissal order issued and who signed it?
The formal order was dated October 9 and signed by JNU Vice-Chancellor Santishree D Pandit.

### 4. Which service rules were invoked to execute the termination?
The administration acted under UGC regulation Ref. No. F.91-1/2013 (TFGS)/10(1) and Rule 11(ix) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._