# Meghalaya Social Group Demands Immediate Removal of Advocate General Amit Kumar, Slams Conrad Sangma Government Over Inaction > The Confederation of Meghalaya Social Organisations has demanded the immediate removal of Advocate General Amit Kumar, criticising Chief Minister Conrad Sangma for failing to honour assurances given to the legal fraternity. **Type:** article · **Category:** Meghalaya · **Published:** 2026-10-09 · **Source:** TrendKia **Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/meghalaya/meghalaya-ke-edavoketa-janarala-amit-kumar-ko-hatane-ki-manga-teja-samajika-sngathana-ne-conrad-sangma-sarakara-para-lagaya-nishkr-45354 · **Language:** English **Tags:** Meghalaya, Conrad Sangma, Amit Kumar, Advocate General, CoMSO, Shillong, Legal News A growing controversy surrounding the top law officer of Meghalaya has intensified, with the Confederation of Meghalaya Social Organisations (CoMSO) strongly criticising the Conrad K. Sangma-led state administration. The civil society organisation has voiced serious displeasure over the government's refusal to act against Advocate General Amit Kumar, despite widespread resistance from legal practitioners and persistent questions regarding the operational conduct of his office. ## Failure to Address Concerns of the Legal Fraternity In a formal statement issued on Thursday, CoMSO General Secretary Balkarin Ch. Marak stated that Chief Minister Conrad Sangma had reneged on specific assurances previously offered to members of the legal fraternity. The organisation noted that the prolonged inaction by the executive branch is eroding the credibility, trust, and accountability of the ruling dispensation. Furthermore, CoMSO pointed out that the ongoing confrontation between the government and legal professionals is actively disrupting court proceedings, leaving regular citizens who seek timely justice to bear the brunt of the administrative stalemate. ## Questions Over Public Spending and RTI Disclosures The organisation has also drawn attention to administrative appointments and official public expenditure tied to the Advocate General's office. CoMSO raised sharp questions about how the state government handles queries filed under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, particularly regarding legal expenses and financial disbursements. Questioning the lack of transparency, the organisation asked why the citizens of Meghalaya are being kept unaware of how crores of rupees in public funds are being deployed for government legal representation. ## Objections to Bypassing Local Legal Talent A central grievance raised by CoMSO is the government's continued decision to retain an Advocate General from outside Meghalaya. The organisation asserted that the state possesses several experienced, highly qualified, and competent local advocates who are entirely capable of occupying the constitutional post. By bypassing local professionals, CoMSO alleged, the Chief Minister appears far more intent on shielding a single individual than on protecting the institutional dignity of the legal apparatus or safeguarding the broader credibility of the government. ## Accountability Demanded from the State Leadership Holding the Conrad Sangma-led administration squarely responsible for the ongoing turmoil, CoMSO made it clear that the leadership had ample opportunity to defuse the standoff but chose silence instead. The organisation emphasized that Meghalaya is not the personal domain of the government, reiterating that public institutions cannot be governed according to individual whims or private preferences. According to CoMSO, the continuous silence from the highest office is increasingly seen as a deliberate effort to shield Amit Kumar rather than an honest attempt to uphold democratic accountability. ## What this means for you This administrative standoff and legal impasse directly affects court operations and public financial accountability in the state. - **In Meghalaya:** Disruptions in court functioning are affecting daily judicial proceedings. Regular citizens and litigants seeking timely justice are facing avoidable delays and procedural hurdles. - **Public Fund Scrutiny:** Questions have been raised regarding crores of rupees spent on state legal representation. The lack of detailed disclosures under the RTI Act directly impacts transparency regarding taxpayers money. - **Local Legal Representation:** The continued appointment of a non-local law officer has sparked dissatisfaction among the local bar. This brings the issue of promoting and trusting indigenous legal expertise to the forefront. - **Executive Accountability:** Allegations of unfulfilled promises by the Chief Minister raise questions about administrative governance. The standoff is likely to maintain pressure on the state leadership until a transparent resolution is reached. ## Why this happened This controversy stems from growing dissatisfaction within the local legal community, allegations of excessive public spending on legal services, and the retention of an out-of-state Advocate General. - **Legal Fraternity Discontent:** Opposition against Advocate General Amit Kumar has been brewing among legal professionals regarding the conduct of his office. The failure of the Chief Minister to act on his previous assurances triggered further friction. - **Unanswered RTI Inquiries on Spending:** Civil society groups sought disclosures regarding the crores of rupees spent on government legal representation under the RTI Act. Inadequate transparency regarding these public expenditures escalated public scrutiny. - **Preference for Out-of-State Appointee:** Critics have challenged the government's policy of bypassing local senior advocates. The presence of qualified local lawyers makes the retention of an external appointee a contentious issue. - **Executive Inaction:** The Chief Minister's decision to maintain silence rather than proactively addressing the grievances has deepened the standoff, prompting CoMSO to issue an ultimatum. ## Questions & Answers ### 1. What demand has been raised by CoMSO? The organisation has demanded the immediate removal of Meghalaya Advocate General Amit Kumar from his constitutional post. ### 2. What allegations did CoMSO level against Chief Minister Conrad Sangma? CoMSO accused the Chief Minister of failing to honour assurances given to the legal fraternity and deliberately shielding Amit Kumar. ### 3. What questions were raised regarding public expenditure? The organisation questioned the government's transparency regarding the crores of rupees spent on legal fees and RTI requests concerning the Advocate General's office. ### 4. How is this standoff affecting court proceedings and the public? According to CoMSO, the confrontation has disrupted court functioning, causing hardship to ordinary citizens seeking justice. ### 5. Who issued the statement on behalf of CoMSO? The statement was issued on Thursday by CoMSO General Secretary Balkarin Ch. Marak. --- _TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._