Apex Court Mandates Fresh Survey of Elephant Corridors, Rules Crop Damage Cannot Justify Blocking Migration Routes

The Supreme Court has instructed the Union Environment Ministry to conduct a fresh nationwide survey of elephant corridors, ruling that states cannot block wildlife migration routes on the grounds of agricultural damage.

The Supreme Court of India has issued vital directives regarding wildlife corridors, ruling firmly that state governments cannot block traditional elephant passages simply because crops suffer damage during their movement. The apex court stressed that wildlife migration routes must remain completely free of human interference, noting that long-distance travel is a natural and necessary instinct of elephant herds.

Fresh Nationwide Survey Ordered for Elephant Corridors
During the proceedings, Chief Justice Surya Kant highlighted that elephant herds inherently travel vast distances as part of their regular movement pattern. The bench affirmed that no state can be permitted to obstruct these natural pathways under the pretext of preventing crop destruction. Instead of creating physical obstacles, authorities must find balanced wildlife management solutions.

To address existing disruptions, the Supreme Court directed the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change to execute a comprehensive fresh survey of all elephant corridors across the country. The ministry is required to submit a report detailing the exact points where obstructions have emerged along these corridors, alongside the concrete administrative measures instituted to restore seamless animal passage. The court recognized that while national guidelines exist to keep corridors secure, local encroachments and developmental pressures have created severe bottlenecks on the ground.

Concerns Over Mobs and Firing to Repel Elephants
The hearing also brought attention to dangerous and aggressive tactics deployed by local communities to drive away wandering elephants. Legal counsel informed the court that organized mobs, locally known as 'hulla parties', frequently gather to scare elephant herds using extreme noise and aggression. This intervention often panics the animals and escalates human-wildlife conflict rather than mitigating it.

Furthermore, concerns were voiced regarding instances of firing and extreme force used against elephants during their natural transit. Chief Justice Surya Kant acknowledged these risks and mandated a detailed submission on the steps being taken to prohibit 'hulla parties' and curb the firing of weapons at migrating wildlife.

Supreme Court Directives on the Cauvery Water Dispute
In a separate judicial matter heard on the same day, the Supreme Court addressed inter-state water sharing between southern states. The court directed the Karnataka government to strictly abide by the directions issued by the Cauvery Water Management Authority (CWMA) regarding the release of Cauvery river water to Tamil Nadu.

A bench comprising Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta fixed August 24 to hear Tamil Nadu's petition requesting the scheduled discharge of water. The bench indicated that the current status of water release would be thoroughly reviewed during the upcoming hearing to ensure compliance with statutory authority orders.

What this means for you
Across India: The mandatory survey and removal of corridor obstructions aim to diminish human-wildlife conflict and safeguard natural migration paths.

In Karnataka and Tamil Nadu: Strict adherence to CWMA orders provides legal clarity and regulatory oversight on inter-state river water sharing.

Questions & Answers

1. What did the Supreme Court order regarding elephant corridors?
The Supreme Court ordered the Union Environment Ministry to conduct a fresh survey of all elephant corridors in the country and submit a report on existing obstructions.

2. Can states block elephant paths to protect crops?
No, the apex court clearly stated that crop damage cannot be used as a justification to block natural elephant migration routes.

3. What concerns were raised about 'hulla parties' and firing?
The court expressed concern over mobs ('hulla parties') and firing used to drive away elephants, asking authorities to report on measures taken to stop these practices.

4. What was the Supreme Court's directive on the Cauvery water dispute?
The Supreme Court directed the Karnataka government to abide by the instructions of the Cauvery Water Management Authority (CWMA) regarding water release to Tamil Nadu.

5. When is the next hearing scheduled for the Cauvery water case?
The bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta scheduled the next hearing on Tamil Nadu's petition for August 24.

https://trendkia.com/en/national/hathiyon-ke-galiyaron-para-supreme-court-ka-sakhta-rukha-phasalon-ke-nukasana-ka-havala-dekara-rasta-rokane-para-jatai-narajagi-17625
TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.