BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj Confronts Congress on Women Safety, Demands Answers from Rahul and Priyanka BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj has sharply criticized the Congress leadership over alleged double standards on women's safety, questioning the silence of Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi regarding cases involving Bimol Akoijam, Harak Singh Rawat, and an NSUI functionary. Addressing a press conference in Delhi, Bharatiya Janata Party Member of Parliament Bansuri Swaraj launched a direct attack on the senior leadership of the Congress party over issues concerning women's dignity and security. Swaraj directed searching questions at Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi, arguing that the party maintains a stark dichotomy between its public pronouncements on women's empowerment and its internal handling of serious accusations against its own leaders and office bearers. Objections Raised Over Bimol Akoijam Heading Election Panels Swaraj initiated her critique by highlighting the case of Bimol Akoijam, the Congress Member of Parliament from Manipur. She recalled that during his tenure at Jawaharlal Nehru University, 11 female students had brought forth grave allegations of sexual harassment against him. A formal disciplinary proceeding had ensued, in which the inquiry panel determined that he was culpable of the charges. Following those findings, he was removed from his service, prompting him to seek legal redress before the High Court. The BJP parliamentarian questioned the rationale behind rewarding an individual with such past findings with central campaign responsibilities. Congress has designated Bimol Akoijam as the co-chairman of the election committee, campaign committee, and manifesto committee for the Manipur legislative assembly elections. Swaraj argued that an architect of a manifesto actively scripts the strategic roadmap and core values of a political organization, suggesting that entrusting this responsibility to a controversial figure reflects poorly on the direction of the party itself. The Allegations Surrounding Harak Singh Rawat and DNA Testing Shifting focus to Uttarakhand, Swaraj took aim at the appointment of veteran politician Harak Singh Rawat to a prominent election post. She stated that Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge had appointed Rawat as the chairman of the state election committee despite ongoing controversy. According to Swaraj, a woman hailing from Assam had leveled substantial allegations against Rawat and formally sought a DNA test to substantiate her claims, with the matter being assigned to a female police officer for scrutiny. Swaraj underlined that the most telling aspect of these controversies is the persistent silence maintained by Rahul Gandhi and the central party leadership. She contended that by failing to demand accountability or initiate transparent internal reviews, the party conveys that influential political figures remain shielded from scrutiny regardless of the nature of the allegations against them. Scrutiny of Priyanka Gandhi's Slogan and Internal Standards Swaraj explicitly invoked the prominent campaign slogan 'Ladki hoon, lad sakti hoon' popularized by Priyanka Gandhi during previous state elections. She asked whether that slogan represents a genuine ethical commitment to standing alongside women or merely serves as convenient rhetoric during electoral campaigns. Swaraj asked whether Priyanka Gandhi is prepared to champion the cause of women's dignity when the accused belong to the upper echelons of her own organization. She asserted that women voters across the country are closely observing these contradictions. Swaraj maintained that in forthcoming electoral contests, female citizens will demand answers from the Congress party and hold its leadership accountable for decisions that appear to compromise on the security and dignity of women. Accusations Involving an NSUI Functionary Concluding her remarks, Swaraj raised a third matter involving an office bearer of the National Students' Union of India, the student wing of the Congress party. She alleged that an NSUI functionary attempted to exert undue influence on young women by offering inducements such as concert tickets and gifts. Furthermore, Swaraj stated that attempts were made to take these young women to Ahmedabad under questionable circumstances. Given that the NSUI operates as a direct student affiliate of the Congress, Swaraj argued that the party hierarchy cannot distance itself from the conduct of its youth leadership. She asserted that the silence of Rahul Gandhi and other key figures on these matters demonstrates that moral posturing has taken precedence over meaningful action within the organization. What this means for you This political confrontation highlights the growing public scrutiny over political parties' commitments to women's rights and ethical accountability. • Across India: National discourse regarding the selection of candidates and committee leaders will become increasingly focused on past records and pending complaints. Citizens are likely to evaluate party manifestos against the background of their internal governance. • In election-bound states: Issues surrounding women's security and organizational integrity will feature prominently in upcoming campaign debates. Political formations will face sharper scrutiny regarding the candidates and campaign managers they deploy. • Political accountability: Pressure will build on political leadership to articulate clear protocols when serious complaints are made against party or youth wing members. Maintaining public silence on such matters will likely carry greater political costs in electoral contests. • Female electorate influence: Women voters continue to constitute a decisive electoral bloc that evaluates parties on tangible safety commitments rather than rhetoric. Parties will find it necessary to establish demonstrable consistency between campaign slogans and administrative choices. Why this happened The sharp critique launched by BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj stems directly from three distinct incidents involving leaders and affiliates associated with the Congress party. • Bimol Akoijam's committee role: Congress appointed Manipur MP Bimol Akoijam to key election and manifesto panels. Swaraj challenged this move by citing past disciplinary findings and allegations of sexual harassment made by 11 female students at Jawaharlal Nehru University. • Harak Singh Rawat's appointment: The elevation of Harak Singh Rawat as the chairman of the Uttarakhand election committee triggered controversy. Swaraj pointed to serious complaints made by an Assam-based woman demanding a DNA test, questioning the party's failure to address the matter. • Allegations involving NSUI: An allegation that a student wing office bearer attempted to lure young women with concert passes and transport them to Ahmedabad fueled further criticism. These interconnected episodes formed the basis of the BJP's assertion that Congress practices double standards regarding women's rights. Questions & Answers 1. Which Congress leaders did Bansuri Swaraj seek answers from? Bansuri Swaraj demanded answers directly from Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi over their silence on allegations against party members. 2. What allegations were raised regarding Bimol Akoijam? Swaraj stated that 11 female students at JNU had accused him of sexual harassment and he was dismissed following an inquiry, yet he was appointed co-chair of key election panels. 3. What is the issue concerning Harak Singh Rawat? According to Swaraj, a woman from Assam leveled serious allegations against Rawat and sought a DNA test, with the investigation assigned to a female police officer. 4. What complaint was cited against the NSUI functionary? It was alleged that an NSUI office bearer offered concert tickets and gifts as inducements to young women in an attempt to take them to Ahmedabad. https://trendkia.com/en/national/mahila-suraksha-para-congress-ke-dohare-rukha-para-bjp-ka-prahara-sansada-bansuri-swaraj-ne-rahul-aura-priyanka-se-mange-tikhe-sav-59622 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.