Calcutta High Court Demands Fresh CBI Status Report by August 28 in RG Kar Doctor Murder Case The Calcutta High Court division bench expressed dissatisfaction over the speed of the CBI probe in the RG Kar murder case, directing the agency to submit a updated status report by 2 PM on August 28. The division bench of the Calcutta High Court raised sharp questions over the pace of the ongoing probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the RG Kar murder case. Following the submission of the agency's progress report, the judges questioned how much longer people must wait for justice to be served. Taking a stern view of the proceedings, the bench directed the CBI to submit a fresh status report by 2:00 PM on August 28. CBI Progress Report and Interrogation of Doctors During the courtroom proceedings, the CBI informed the bench that it has been interrogating four doctors who had dinner with the victim on the night of the incident. The investigating agency stated that statements of some of these medical professionals have already been recorded, while the remaining individuals will be questioned shortly. The court asked the agency to proceed with utmost thoroughness regarding all witnesses involved. Courtroom Revelations and the Post-11:15 PM Timeline Representing the victim's family, advocate Jayanta Narayan Chattopadhyay brought several crucial points to the court's attention. He argued that the timeline following 11:15 PM on that night remains unclear and urged that the investigation focus squarely on this window. The lawyer pointed out that despite having dinner with the victim that evening, the four doctors were not questioned early in the probe, raising concerns that influential individuals might be receiving protection. Responding to this submission, Justice Tirthankar Ghosh clarified the legal framework, noting, "It is the investigating agency's task to decide who will be a witness and who an accused." The judge emphasized that the court cannot interfere with the operational decisions of the investigating authority. Witness Statements and Comparative Examination The bench engaged in detailed questioning regarding witness testimonies. Justice Tirthankar Ghosh inquired specifically about the statement of Dr. Soumitra Roy. When the CBI confirmed that his statement had been recorded earlier, Justice Ghosh instructed the agency to produce both the older and newer statements of Dr. Soumitra Roy so that a comparative examination could be conducted. Furthermore, the court took note of three additional affidavits examined by the CBI, as well as the questioning of the victim's mother. The statement of a witness who saw the body being brought down has also been formally recorded. In response to Justice Shampa Sarkar's query on whether this statement was taken pursuant to court directions, Additional Solicitor General Dhiraj Trivedi clarified that the statement had been documented back on July 8. Hospital Communication Timestamp and Scope of Re-investigation The bench also inquired about the exact time when the victim's family was first notified of the tragedy. The CBI informed the court that the RG Kar hospital authorities contacted the victim's mother at 9:30 AM. Addressing the confusion that arose during the earlier investigation by the Special Investigation Team, the division bench instructed the CBI to conduct a complete re-investigation covering the entire sequence of events from the crime scene all the way to the crematorium. Additional Solicitor General Dhiraj Trivedi assured the court that the CBI is examining every single angle and taking all allegations with utmost seriousness. What this means for you Across India: This case continues to influence national conversations regarding healthcare worker safety and transparency in high-profile criminal investigations. In West Bengal: The High Court's strict monitoring reinforces expectations among Kolkata residents for a fair and timely investigation into the incident. Questions & Answers 1. What deadline did the Calcutta High Court set for the CBI's next status report? The division bench directed the CBI to submit its fresh status report by 2:00 PM on August 28. 2. What update did the CBI provide regarding the doctors who dined with the victim? The CBI stated that statements of some of the four doctors who dined with the victim have been recorded, with questioning of the remaining doctors scheduled soon. 3. Which specific timeline was questioned by the family's advocate? Advocate Jayanta Narayan Chattopadhyay highlighted that the timeline following 11:15 PM on the night of the incident remains unclear. 4. At what time was the victim's mother first contacted by the hospital? According to the CBI, the RG Kar hospital authorities contacted the victim's mother at 9:30 AM. https://trendkia.com/en/national/calcutta-high-court-ne-rg-kar-doktara-hatyakanda-men-cbi-ko-28-agasta-taka-nai-stetasa-riporta-saunpane-ka-diya-nirdesha-14412 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.