{
  "type": "article",
  "title": "Chief Justice Suryakant clears the air on Jantar Mantar protest hearing controversy",
  "summary": "Chief Justice of India Suryakant has clarified his viral courtroom remarks regarding a Jantar Mantar protest, stating that no actual petition was ever filed in the Supreme Court.",
  "content": "Chief Justice of India (CJI) Suryakant has clarified his widely discussed remarks regarding a protest at Jantar Mantar, expressing strong displeasure with media coverage of the proceedings. Addressing the issue on Friday, the CJI pointed out that news outlets misrepresented the courtroom interaction by claiming he had refused to list a petition concerning police action against demonstrators.\n\nNo formal petition was ever filed in the Supreme Court\nCJI Suryakant emphasized that a mere representation does not equate to a legally registered petition. To double-check the facts, the Chief Justice revealed that he had personally directed the Supreme Court registry to verify the records. The registry confirmed that no official documents, petitions, or paperwork associated with the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) protest had been submitted or filed. The Chief Justice criticized the rush to publish stories without verification, noting that people began reporting on the matter without understanding that no formal case existed on the court docket.\n\nThe courtroom drama of July twenty-second\nThe background of the controversy dates back to July 22, when a lawyer made an unscheduled mention of the Jantar Mantar protests before the bench. The advocate claimed that students protesting at the historic site were subjected to brutal police action during their march to Parliament. He urged the bench to list the matter urgently, asserting that he possessed video evidence to substantiate the claims of police brutality.\n\nDuring this exchange, the lawyer also brought up other pressing issues. He demanded that the government ensure a fair and transparent conduct of the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET). He further argued that the National Testing Agency (NTA) should be dissolved immediately due to continuous paper leak incidents that have plagued recent examinations.\n\nThe context behind the Chief Justice's viral remarks\nIn response to the lawyer's persistent requests to view the footage, CJI Suryakant had made the remarks that went viral. The Chief Justice told the lawyer, \"Please do not waste our time and yours too.\" He added that the advocate's time was actually more valuable than that of the bench.\n\nEven as the Supreme Court moved on to call the next case on the board, the lawyer continued to press his point, offering to play the video clips showing police excesses against the student protestors. This prompted the CJI to state clearly that the bench had no interest in watching the videos and lacked the time to do so. This specific statement was widely shared and debated online, drawing criticism from various quarters. By providing this clarification on Friday, the Chief Justice aimed to set the record straight regarding legal procedures and media responsibility.\n\nWhat this means for you\n• Across India: It emphasizes that citizens must rely on verified court filings rather than viral social media snippets or unverified news reporting to understand judicial decisions.\n• For protestors and students: It clarifies that procedural compliance, such as filing a formal petition through the registry, is mandatory for the Supreme Court to hear urgent matters regarding public protests or examination issues like NEET.\n\nQuestions & Answers\n\n1. Why did CJI Suryakant express displeasure with media reporting?\nHe clarified that the media falsely reported that the court refused to list a petition regarding the Jantar Mantar protest, when in fact, no such petition was ever filed.\n\n2. What was actually presented in court on July 22 instead of a petition?\nOnly a representation was submitted on that day. A check with the registry confirmed that no official documents related to the CJP protest had been filed.\n\n3. What demands did the lawyer make in court on July 22?\nThe lawyer demanded a hearing on alleged police brutality against students at Jantar Mantar, fair conduct of the NEET exam, and the dissolution of the NTA due to paper leaks.\n\n4. What did CJI Suryakant say regarding the request to show video evidence?\nThe CJI stated that the court did not have the time to watch videos and requested the lawyer not to waste the court's time.",
  "url": "https://trendkia.com/en/national/jantar-mantar-pradarshana-mamale-men-cji-suryakant-ne-di-saphai-kaha-supreme-court-men-koi-yachika-ai-hi-nahin-thi-10349",
  "category": "India",
  "publishedAt": "2026-07-24",
  "tags": [
    "Supreme Court",
    "CJI Suryakant",
    "Jantar Mantar Protest",
    "NEET Exam",
    "NTA",
    "Court Proceedings"
  ],
  "language": "en",
  "site": "TrendKia"
}