# CJI Surya Kant Backs Elevation of Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh, Likens Supreme Court Pace to a T20 Match

> Chief Justice of India Surya Kant defended the collegium's pick of two new judges, observing that working in the Supreme Court now mirrors the swift pace of a T20 cricket match.

**Type:** article · **Category:** India · **Published:** 2026-11-04 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/national/nyayamurti-sunita-agarwal-aura-nyayamurti-aparesh-kumar-singh-ki-niyukti-para-bole-cji-surya-kant-shirsha-adalata-men-kama-ki-raph-56664 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Supreme Court, Surya Kant, Sunita Agarwal, Aparesh Kumar Singh, Collegium, Judiciary, SCBA

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant has shared the reasoning behind the collegium's recent choice to elevate Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh to the nation's highest court. Speaking at an event on November 3, the Chief Justice affirmed that the selection was guided squarely by the two judges' relentless hard work and proven competence. He observed that the real standing of the apex court does not rest merely on constitutional power, but on the trust it inspires among everyday citizens.

## Institutional Integrity and Public Faith
Chief Justice Surya Kant noted that public faith in the judiciary is built upon multiple pillars. It is shaped by the soundness of judicial rulings, the procedural fairness shown inside courtrooms, respectful conduct toward litigants, and the firm assurance that anyone approaching the bench will receive an impartial hearing free of bias. Sustaining this faith, he stressed, is an unbroken institutional obligation that demands active dedication from every individual serving within the legal administration.

## Address at the Supreme Court Bar Association Felicitation
The remarks came during a felicitation gathering organised by the Supreme Court Bar Association to honour the newly appointed judges. Addressing the gathering, the Chief Justice remarked that both judges bring extensive, diverse backgrounds from serving across various High Courts in different roles, which will offer immense institutional value to the apex court. He pointed out that while selecting individuals for this team, multiple objective parameters are scrutinized.

## Team Coordination and the Fast-Paced Modern Docket
Drawing an analogy to modern sport, Chief Justice Surya Kant highlighted the intensity of daily proceedings at the apex court. He remarked, the Supreme Court is virtually playing a T20 match now. In his view, a critical consideration during evaluations is assessing how effectively a candidate operates as part of a collective bench, given the pressing speed and heavy volume of casework. He noted that this quality was specifically weighed when shortlisting the two High Court Chief Justices.

## Confidence in the Collegium's Decision
Expressing satisfaction with the appointments, Chief Justice Surya Kant said he was delighted to see the two accomplished High Court Chief Justices take their seats on the bench. He shared full confidence that both jurists will demonstrate their legal acumen through high-level judicial output, ultimately validating the wisdom of the collegium's decision to bring them onto the top court.

## What this means for you
The emphasis on swift teamwork and merit in Supreme Court appointments points toward faster disposal of high-stakes litigation.

- **Across India:** Accelerating the speed of hearings at the apex court directly benefits ordinary litigants awaiting resolution. Quicker case processing helps reduce systemic backlogs across the entire judicial framework.
- **For the Court Administration:** Bringing in seasoned High Court Chief Justices strengthens bench capacity and improves output quality. This ensures that appeals and constitutional petitions receive thorough, unbiased evaluations without delays.
- **For Litigants:** Adapting to a fast-moving docket akin to a T20 game means urgent matters reach hearings sooner. Citizens turning to the court can expect timely attention to their grievances.
- **For Judicial Transparency:** Stressing objective factors and collective performance sets a clear standard for higher judicial elevations. This consistency reinforces institutional trust across the legal community and the public.

## Why this happened
The Chief Justice addressed the rationale behind the collegium's recent appointments during a Supreme Court Bar Association event.

- **Basis of Selection:** The elevations of Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh were driven by their sustained diligence, legal competence, and extensive judicial service across various High Courts. The collegium viewed these objective credentials as decisive.
- **Shifting Demands of the Docket:** The apex court faces an intense pace of litigation, which the Chief Justice compared to playing a T20 cricket match. This environment required candidates who could collaborate seamlessly and deliver consistent team-based performance under pressure.
- **Preserving Institutional Faith:** The judiciary relies on courtroom impartiality and the guarantee that every litigant is heard respectfully without prejudice. Elevating seasoned High Court Chief Justices was aimed at reinforcing this core institutional commitment.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. Whose appointments did CJI Surya Kant defend?
He defended the collegium's decision to elevate Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh to the Supreme Court.

### 2. What comparison did the CJI make regarding the Supreme Court's work?
He observed that the work of the Supreme Court has virtually become as fast-paced as a T20 match.

### 3. When and where were these remarks delivered?
The remarks were delivered on November 3 at a felicitation event organised by the Supreme Court Bar Association.

### 4. According to the CJI, where does the real strength of the Supreme Court lie?
He stated that the court's true strength lies not merely in constitutional powers, but in the trust it inspires among the public.

### 5. What factors guided the collegium in choosing the two judges?
The collegium considered their hard work, merit, extensive High Court experience, and their ability to perform as strong team players.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._