DHFL Probe Bribery Exposed: CBI Arrests SFIO Deputy Director and Delhi Lawyer in 1 Crore Rupee Trap The CBI has apprehended an SFIO deputy director rank IRS officer alongside a Delhi lawyer and his relative for demanding a 1 crore rupee bribe in the DHFL fraud probe. The agency set a trap and caught the accused right after an initial installment of 20 lakh rupees changed hands. In a major strike against corruption inside premier economic intelligence establishments, the Central Bureau of Investigation has taken into custody a deputy director level officer from the Serious Fraud Investigation Office in connection with an alleged 1 crore rupee bribery scheme. The illegal gratification was reportedly demanded to extend undue relief to a complainant in the high-profile Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited fraud case. Along with the senior official, a practising advocate based in Delhi and his relative have also been apprehended under anti-corruption statutes following an intricately planned trap operation. Extortion of 1 Crore Rupees in Exchange for Case Relief The bribery scandal originated directly from an active SFIO investigation being handled out of Chennai concerning the massive financial irregularites at DHFL. During the course of these proceedings, the accused public servant allegedly sought an extortionate sum of 1 crore rupees in exchange for diluting charges and extending illicit advantages to the complainant. Once formal representations were verified and an FIR was registered against the SFIO officer, the lawyer, and their associates, the central investigative team coordinated an undercover operation to capture the conspirators in the act of accepting money. Trap Sprung Following the Exchange of 20 Lakh Rupees After completing the procedural scrutiny of the primary complaint and lodging the formal criminal case, enforcement sleuths positioned themselves strategically around the designated delivery location. In accordance with the illicit arrangement, the Delhi-based lawyer accepted the first installment of 20 lakh rupees from the complainant on behalf of the Chennai-based SFIO official. The moment the physical handover of this initial tranche concluded, the surveillance unit moved in swiftly, detaining the advocate, his accomplice relative, and subsequently the supervisory SFIO officer involved in negotiating the deal. Identity and Designations of the Apprehended Individuals Official releases detailing the enforcement drive have formally identified the trio arrested during the anti-corruption sweep. The central figure among the suspects is Harish Kumar Tanwar, who serves as a deputy director with the SFIO in Chennai and belongs to the 2017 batch of the Indian Revenue Service. The legal intermediary implicated in facilitating the corrupt conduit has been identified as Bharat Sharma, a legal practitioner from Delhi. The third individual taken into custody is Aryan Sharma, who has been established as a relative of advocate Bharat Sharma. Search Operations Yield Critical Incriminating Material Following the formal detentions, search parties expanded their operations to execute targeted raids across residential and professional premises connected to the IRS officer and the lawyer. According to official disclosures, the intensive cordon-and-search procedures led to the recovery of substantial incriminating documentation and evidence bearing direct relevance to the illicit transaction. The central agency continues to examine the seized records to map out the entire communication trail and determine whether additional individuals were linked to the extortion bid. What this means for you Decisive crackdowns on internal bribery within premier investigative bodies reinforce public confidence and preserve the integrity of complex white-collar fraud inquiries. • Across India: The arrest sends an uncompromising signal that accountability applies equally to officers inside elite economic enforcement agencies. Investors and corporate stakeholders gain reassurance that high-stakes financial cases cannot be compromised through backroom monetary settlements. • In Delhi and Chennai: The enforcement actions in these two metropolitan legal corridors place questionable intermediaries and corporate lawyers under tighter surveillance. Professionals handling regulatory representations will face higher scrutiny regarding ethical boundaries and transaction trails. • For Corporate Entities Under Probe: Businesses facing regulatory inquiries are reminded to avoid illicit settlement conduits managed by third parties. Direct escalation to vigilance authorities remains the safest and legally compliant recourse whenever extortion demands arise. • For Citizens and Complainants: The swift execution of the 20 lakh rupee sting demonstrates that authentic whistleblowing leads to prompt enforcement intervention. Persons confronted with extortionate demands by investigating officials have a viable path to seek legal recourse without capitulating to illegal terms. Why this happened This enforcement action was triggered when illicit financial demands were made to compromise a major corporate fraud probe. The affected complainant formally approached federal investigators, paving the way for a targeted surveillance operation that exposed the bribery conspiracy. • Direct Trigger: An extortion demand of 1 crore rupees was made during an active DHFL inquiry conducted by the SFIO Chennai unit to confer illegal benefits upon the complainant. Rather than yielding to the pressure, the aggrieved party lodged a formal complaint with the CBI. • Intermediary Conduit: To shield the public servant, a private advocate from Delhi and his relative operated as financial conduits to receive the illicit funds. The transaction collapsed into an arrest when the legal intermediary accepted the initial 20 lakh rupee cash tranche. • Verification and Trap Logistics: Preliminary intelligence gathering by the anti-corruption agency validated the extortion claims, leading to an immediate FIR under anti-bribery laws. Investigators subsequently deployed field operatives to intercept the suspects during the scheduled exchange of money. Questions & Answers 1. Which investigative agency's officer was arrested by the CBI in the bribery case? The CBI arrested a deputy director rank officer belonging to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO). 2. What was the total amount demanded as a bribe in this case? A total bribe of 1 crore rupees was demanded in exchange for extending relief during the investigation. 3. What was the initial installment amount recovered during the trap operation? The CBI trapped the accused red-handed while accepting the initial installment of 20 lakh rupees. 4. What is the identity and rank of the arrested government officer? The officer has been identified as Harish Kumar Tanwar, an SFIO deputy director in Chennai and a 2017 batch IRS officer. 5. Who are the other individuals arrested alongside the SFIO official? The other two arrested individuals are Delhi-based advocate Bharat Sharma and his relative Aryan Sharma. 6. Which major corporate fraud probe formed the background of this bribery scandal? The extortion scheme was tied directly to the ongoing probe into the DHFL financial scam. https://trendkia.com/en/national/dhfl-mamale-men-1-karora-rupaye-ki-ghusakhori-ka-bhndaphora-cbi-ne-sfio-ke-dipti-dayarektara-aura-vakila-ko-dabocha-47850 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.