# DU Student NSA Custody Case: Noida DM Medha Rupam Moves Supreme Court Against High Court Order

> Gautam Buddh Nagar District Magistrate Medha Rupam has moved the Supreme Court against the Allahabad High Court order that quashed the NSA detention of Delhi University student Akriti Choudhary and imposed a 5 lakh rupees penalty recoverable from official salaries. Reacting to the appeal, Cockroach Janta Party spokesperson Sourav Das criticized the DM and urged the apex court to raise the penalty to 20 lakh rupees.

**Type:** article · **Category:** India · **Published:** 2026-09-13 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/national/delhi-university-ki-chhatra-ki-nsa-hirasata-para-5-lakha-rupaye-muavaje-ka-phaisala-noida-dm-medha-rupam-pahunchin-supreme-court-31875 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Medha Rupam, Akriti Choudhary, National Security Act, Allahabad High Court, Supreme Court, Noida, Sourav Das, Gautam Buddh Nagar

Gautam Buddh Nagar District Magistrate Medha Rupam has approached the Supreme Court to challenge an Allahabad High Court ruling that invalidated the detention of a Delhi University student under the National Security Act (NSA). The High Court had declared the student's nearly five-month detention illegal and awarded her 5 lakh rupees in compensation. In a significant direction, the High Court had ordered that the compensation amount be recovered directly from the personal salaries of the responsible administrative officers, including the District Magistrate.

## Background of the Noida Protest and NSA Custody
The case stems from a protest held in Noida, following which Delhi University student Akriti Choudhary was taken into custody under the stringent provisions of the National Security Act. As a consequence of the administrative order, Choudhary remained in detention for approximately five months. The detention was subsequently challenged before the Allahabad High Court, where a bench examined the legality of the state action. On September 2, the High Court delivered its verdict, quashing the NSA detention order and holding that the entire custodial action lacked legal authorization.

## High Court Critique and Direction for Personal Recovery
While delivering its judgment on September 2, the Allahabad High Court passed severe strictures against the bureaucracy and raised serious questions regarding the conduct of the involved officials. The court noted that administrative authority cannot be used to arbitrarily restrict an individual's fundamental freedom. To enforce accountability, the court directed that the 5 lakh rupees compensation granted to Akriti Choudhary must not come from the state exchequer, but should instead be deducted from the personal monthly salaries of the officers responsible for the improper detention.

## Political Criticism and Reaction from CJP Spokesperson Sourav Das
The decision of District Magistrate Medha Rupam to challenge the High Court's directives in the Supreme Court triggered sharp criticism from political quarters. Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) spokesperson Sourav Das took to the social media platform X to express strong disapproval of the appeal. Das characterized the administration's conduct as harsh and autocratic, questioning the rationale behind appealing such a clear judicial rebuke. He sarcastically suggested that the Supreme Court ought to enhance the compensation penalty from 5 lakh rupees to 20 lakh rupees when it hears the matter.

## Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's Stance and Legal Road Ahead
The move to approach the apex court follows earlier signals from Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who had previously indicated that the state administration intended to seek judicial relief against the High Court's ruling. With the petition now formally before the Supreme Court, the legal debate will centre on whether administrative officials can be held personally liable for official actions taken during NSA proceedings. All eyes are now on the Supreme Court as it decides whether to uphold the High Court's unprecedented mandate on civil servant accountability or grant relief to the district administration.

## What this means for you
This legal battle holds major significance for administrative accountability and the protection of fundamental civil liberties.

- **Across India:** If the Supreme Court upholds the High Court order, it will set a strong national precedent against the arbitrary use of stringent laws like the NSA by bureaucrats. It signals to public servants that misuse of power could result in personal financial liability from their own salaries.
- **In Gautam Buddh Nagar:** Local residents and activists gain greater assurance regarding civil rights protections during public demonstrations. The outcome directly impacts how district officials and law enforcement handle public protests and administrative detentions in the region.

## Why this happened
Gautam Buddh Nagar District Magistrate Medha Rupam moved the Supreme Court to seek relief against an extraordinary High Court ruling on bureaucratic liability.

- **Primary Cause:** On September 2, the Allahabad High Court quashed the 5-month NSA detention of DU student Akriti Choudhary, ruling that the detention was legally invalid.
- **Personal Financial Penalty:** The High Court directed that the 5 lakh rupees compensation be recovered directly from the personal salaries of responsible officers including the DM, prompting the administrative challenge.
- **State Legal Strategy:** Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had previously indicated that the administration would contest the verdict in the top court to protect official immunity and challenge the salary recovery mandate.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. Who filed the petition in the Supreme Court and why?
Gautam Buddh Nagar District Magistrate Medha Rupam filed the petition in the Supreme Court against the Allahabad High Court order that quashed student Akriti Choudhary's NSA detention and ordered compensation of 5 lakh rupees to be recovered from officials' salaries.

### 2. What was Akriti Choudhary's case and how long was she detained?
Delhi University student Akriti Choudhary was detained under the National Security Act following a protest in Noida and spent approximately five months in custody before the order was quashed.

### 3. What did the Allahabad High Court order in its September 2 judgment?
On September 2, the High Court declared Akriti's NSA detention illegal and awarded 5 lakh rupees in compensation, directing that the amount be recovered from the personal salaries of the responsible officers.

### 4. What was the reaction of Cockroach Janta Party spokesperson Sourav Das?
Sourav Das posted on X that it was autocratic for the DM to appeal against such a harsh judicial order and sarcastically suggested that the Supreme Court should increase the fine to 20 lakh rupees.

### 5. What was Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's involvement in the case?
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had previously informed the Supreme Court that the administration planned to challenge the Allahabad High Court's verdict in the top court.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._