{
  "type": "article",
  "title": "Election Commission Explains Removal of 13.39 Crore Voter Names, Outlines Re-Enrollment Process",
  "summary": "Addressing opposition allegations over the deletion of more than 13 crore voters during Special Intensive Revision, the Election Commission clarified that entries were classified under the ASDD category, reiterating that eligible citizens can re-register anytime via Form 6.",
  "content": "Addressing allegations raised by opposition parties regarding the removal of over 13 crore voters during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), the Election Commission of India has issued a comprehensive clarification detailing the procedural framework. The poll authority clarified that the nationwide verification identified entries that were absent, permanently shifted, deceased, or registered in duplicate records across locations. Consequently, these names were categorized under the administrative ASDD (Absent, Shifted, Dead, Duplicate) list.\n\nReview Spanned 95.40 Crore Electors Across Three Phases\nAccording to figures released by the Election Commission, the SIR exercise examined records of 95.40 crore registered voters across three structured phases. Of this vast total, 13.39 crore electors were classified under specific operational categories. The commission stressed that an inclusion in the ASDD registry does not signify the permanent revocation of a citizen's constitutional right to vote, emphasizing that the exercise is designed to clean the electoral roll and maintain accurate registries.\n\nGround Verification by 10 Lakh BLOs and 22 Lakh BLAs\nThe ground-level implementation of the intensive revision across states involved a large-scale administrative deployment. Over 10 lakh Booth Level Officers (BLOs) conducted field checks to compile the booth-level ASDD lists. To ensure absolute transparency and afford political stakeholders an opportunity to inspect every entry, booth-wise ASDD registers were formally distributed to more than 22 lakh Booth Level Agents (BLAs) appointed by political parties for verification.\n\nBreakdown of Categorized Electors\nData provided by the commission shows that the single largest share among the 13.39 crore categorized electors consisted of citizens who had permanently relocated from their listed addresses. Permanently transferred individuals accounted for 6.30 crore entries. Furthermore, voters classified as absent or untraceable totaled 3.01 crore. Other segments inside the classified group comprised deceased individuals and duplicate entries documented across multiple polling stations.\n\nMonth-Long Window for Claims and Objections\nThe Election Commission highlighted that following the publication of the draft electoral rolls, a window of approximately one month was provided for citizens to file claims and objections. If an eligible voter had been erroneously left out, the framework permitted immediate inclusion through the submission of Form 6. The commission's SIR guidelines explicitly incorporate this mechanism to reintegrate any genuine voter who remained unlisted.\n\nFormal Objection Process and Appellate Remedies\nThe poll authority also noted that mechanisms exist to file formal objections if an ineligible individual's name inadvertently remains on the voter register. Moreover, any citizen whose name does not appear on the final publication retains the statutory right to appeal before the District Election Officer (DM) or the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO). The commission maintained that the dual objective of the exercise is the strict retention of every eligible voter alongside the removal of all ineligible entries.\n\nVoter Enrollment Remains a Continuous Exercise\nResponding to political controversy surrounding the revisions, the commission reiterated that voter registration is an ongoing, continuous administrative process rather than an isolated event. Eligible citizens whose names were omitted or marked under ASDD categories can submit Form 6 at any point to restore their voter status. The commission underscored that legitimate electors retain unhindered avenues to update their details and secure their democratic franchise.\n\nWhat this means for you\nThis nationwide voter roll revision directly affects millions of citizens who have relocated, shifted residences, or are frequently away from their registered addresses.\n\n• Across India: Electors across the country must proactively verify their status in the published electoral rolls before elections approach. Any eligible citizen missing from the roll can restore their voting rights by submitting Form 6 at any time.\n• Relocated Citizens: Individuals who have permanently moved to new residences for work or personal reasons must apply for enrollment at their new polling jurisdiction. Remaining registered solely at an old address risks classification under the shifted category and subsequent removal.\n• Appellate Remedies: Citizens who discover their legitimate entry was struck off erroneously can approach the District Election Officer or Chief Electoral Officer. This formal appeal process guarantees that genuine voters have administrative recourse against improper omissions.\n• Verification via Party Agents: Local political party representatives and booth agents can scrutinize the shared booth-wise lists to identify mistakenly removed residents. This community-level check enables prompt intervention to assist affected voters in filing fresh applications.\n\nWhy this happened\nThe Election Commission undertook this extensive Special Intensive Revision to purge duplicate, deceased, and permanently shifted voters, ensuring that the electoral rolls reflect strictly eligible voters. Detailed clarification became necessary following widespread political allegations surrounding the deletion of over 13 crore names.\n\n• ASDD Categorization Drive: Field evaluations uncovered massive numbers of individuals who were untraceable, had moved away permanently, or were registered across multiple polling stations. Administrative verification required separating these entries to prevent electoral roll inflation.\n• Opposition Allegations: Political parties alleged that millions of legitimate electors had been arbitrarily disenfranchised during the revision. The ensuing controversy prompted the commission to publicize the underlying data and procedural checks.\n• Institutional Transparency: To maintain confidence in electoral integrity, the commission coupled 10 lakh official field officers with over 22 lakh party-appointed booth agents. Distributing lists to all political representatives was designed to pre-empt disputes over wrongful omissions.\n\nQuestions & Answers\n\n1. Under which category did the Election Commission place the 13.39 crore reviewed voter names?\nThe commission placed these entries under the ASDD category, covering absent, permanently shifted, deceased, and duplicate voter records.\n\n2. How many total voter records were evaluated during the SIR exercise?\nA total of 95.40 crore voter records were reviewed across the three phases of the Special Intensive Revision.\n\n3. How many voters were identified as permanently transferred?\nOfficial figures show that 6.30 crore individuals were categorized as permanently shifted electors.\n\n4. What step should an eligible voter take if their name was mistakenly excluded?\nAn eligible citizen can apply at any time to re-enroll in the voter list by submitting Form 6.\n\n5. Where can an individual appeal if their name is missing from the final roll?\nAn excluded elector can file an appeal before the District Election Officer (DM) or the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO).",
  "url": "https://trendkia.com/en/national/matadata-suchi-se-13-39-karora-nama-hatane-para-election-commission-of-india-ki-saphai-bataya-suchi-men-dobara-nama-shamila-karane-44505",
  "category": "India",
  "publishedAt": "2026-10-07",
  "tags": [
    "Election Commission of India",
    "Voter List",
    "Special Intensive Revision",
    "Form 6",
    "Booth Level Officers",
    "Voter Registration"
  ],
  "language": "en",
  "site": "TrendKia"
}