Supreme Court Clarifies Police Authority in Sex Determination Cases, Restricts Direct FIRs Under PCPNDT Act

The Supreme Court has ruled that police cannot directly register FIRs or conduct independent probes under the PCPNDT Act. Primary investigative powers lie strictly with designated Appropriate Authorities, with police limited to a supportive role.

The Supreme Court of India has delivered a landmark judgment clarifying the extent of police authority in matters concerning fetal sex determination and sex selection. A two-judge bench ruled that law enforcement agencies cannot routinely register First Information Reports (FIRs) or conduct independent investigations under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994. The apex court emphasized that primary investigative duties under this special legislation are strictly reserved for statutory designated authorities.

Supreme Court Restricts Direct Police Action Under PCPNDT Act
Delivering the verdict in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh and Others vs Brij Pal Singh, a bench comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice N.K. Singh affirmed the stance taken by the Allahabad High Court. The High Court had held that police officers lack the statutory mandate to directly investigate offenses or register FIRs under the provisions of the PCPNDT Act.

The bench observed that police involvement should be avoided to the extent possible. Law enforcement agencies can step in only to provide an auxiliary or supporting role when specifically requested by the statutory Appropriate Authority appointed under the legislation. Beyond responding to such assistance requests, the police cannot independently initiate proceedings or assume the role of the primary investigative body for PCPNDT violations.

Technical Expertise and Procedural Rigor
Explaining the rationale behind restricting police powers, the Supreme Court pointed out that offenses under the PCPNDT Act involve technical aspects requiring specialized medical knowledge, administrative precision, and delicate handling. The statutory framework was deliberately structured to ensure that inquiries are conducted by designated experts rather than regular police personnel.

The court further highlighted that once a standard police FIR is lodged, it becomes structurally problematic to steer the proceedings toward a valid logical conclusion using the mandatory procedures prescribed under the PCPNDT Act. Regular criminal procedure mechanisms often fail to align with the distinct statutory requirements outlined in this specialized law, potentially jeopardizing prosecution integrity.

Statutory Mandate Under Section 17(4) and General Criminal Law
Referring to Section 17(4) of the statute, the Supreme Court underscored that the duties of receiving complaints, verifying compliance, and initiating legal action are explicitly entrusted to the designated Appropriate Authorities. This assignment of responsibility ensures that investigations adhere strictly to the regulatory protocol envisioned by the lawmakers.

Crucially, the apex court clarified that this restriction applies exclusively to statutory offenses created under the PCPNDT Act itself. The ruling does not curtail, limit, or diminish the independent powers of the police to register cases, investigate, or prosecute distinct offenses punishable under general criminal statutes. Where an act constitutes an independent crime under main penal laws, law enforcement agencies retain full legal authority to take appropriate action.

What this means for you
• Across India: This judgment protects healthcare centers and individuals from procedural harassment by ensuring that only statutory health and administrative authorities can initiate sex-determination probes.
• In Law Enforcement: Police cannot arbitrarily register direct FIRs under the PCPNDT Act, ensuring that technical medical cases follow proper statutory protocol rather than standard police procedures.

Questions & Answers

1. Can police directly register an FIR in fetal sex determination cases?
No, the Supreme Court ruled that police cannot directly register FIRs or act as the primary investigating agency under the PCPNDT Act.

2. Who holds the primary authority to investigate PCPNDT Act violations?
Under Section 17(4) of the Act, primary power to receive complaints and conduct investigations rests solely with designated Appropriate Authorities.

3. Can police assist in sex determination investigations at all?
Yes, but police can only play a supporting or auxiliary role if and when requested by the designated Appropriate Authority.

4. Does this ruling affect police investigation of general criminal law offenses?
No, the apex court clarified that police retain full authority to investigate independent offenses punishable under main criminal laws.

https://trendkia.com/en/national/linga-parikshana-mamalon-men-pulisa-ki-sidhi-fir-para-roka-supreme-court-ne-sunaya-bara-phaisala-18901
TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.