Supreme Court Extends Cruelty Law Protection to Female Partners in Marriage-Like Live-In Relationships

The Supreme Court has ruled that female partners in live-in relationships that resemble marriage are protected against cruelty under Section 498A of the IPC, which corresponds to Sections 85 and 86 of BNS.

The Supreme Court has issued a landmark judgment extending the protective umbrella of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, which deals with cruelty and harassment related to dowry, to female partners in live-in relationships that resemble a marriage. Previously, this specific penal provision was invoked strictly within the bounds of a formal marriage. Under the newly enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the provisions corresponding to Section 498A of the IPC are categorized under Sections 85 and 86.

A division bench comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice N. Kotiswar Singh delivered the ruling while hearing the case titled Dr. Lokesh B.H. versus State of Karnataka. The bench made it clear that whenever a live-in arrangement carries the essential characteristics of a marital relationship, the woman involved is entitled to equal statutory protection against cruelty. In its observation, the court noted that cruelty does not inspect a woman's marital status before visiting a household, and denying protection to women in marriage-like cohabitation violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

Essential Prerequisites for Legal Protection
The apex court clearly outlined specific boundaries regarding who can claim protection under this ruling. The judgment does not offer blanket protection to every short-term or casual cohabitation arrangement. To fall under the purview of Section 498A, the relationship must satisfy defined criteria

• Clear Intent to Marry: Both individuals participating in the live-in relationship must be major adults, entering the relationship with mutual consent and a clear, shared intention to eventually marry.
• Initial Onus on the Complainant: The initial burden of proof rests on the female partner to demonstrate that the cohabitation was not merely a fleeting romance, but a serious arrangement possessing the nature of a marriage.
• Strict Safeguards Against Misuse: To prevent arbitrary allegations and protect male partners, the court mandated strict compliance with the precedent established in the Arnesh Kumar (2014) case. Police officers are required to conduct a mandatory preliminary inquiry prior to effecting any arrest, ensuring that immediate arrests do not follow automatically upon the filing of a complaint.
• Strictly Confined Scope: The court clarified that this broad interpretation is strictly restricted to Section 498A concerning domestic cruelty, and does not automatically modify or alter other personal, family, or matrimonial statutes.

Background of the Appeal and Court Rationale
This landmark determination stemmed from an appeal filed by a petitioner seeking to quash criminal proceedings pending against him in Karnataka. The petitioner contended before the court that the statutory terms under Section 498A could only apply to a legally wedded husband, making the prosecution against a live-in partner legally unmaintainable.

Rejecting this argument, the Supreme Court dismissed the plea and observed that when a cohabiting relationship exhibits all functional characteristics of a marriage, the term 'husband' should not be interpreted in a hyper-technical or narrow manner. The bench stressed that the primary legislative intent behind Section 498A is the suppression of domestic violence and cruelty. Consequently, legal interpretations must remain responsive to evolving societal realities in modern urban settings, where living together before formal marriage is increasingly prevalent.

What this means for you
• Across India: The ruling provides female partners in marriage-like live-in relationships explicit statutory protection against domestic cruelty and harassment.
• Safeguards: The mandatory preliminary inquiry required under Arnesh Kumar guidelines ensures protections against immediate or arbitrary arrests without investigation.

Questions & Answers

1. Does this Supreme Court ruling apply to all live-in relationships?
No, it does not apply to casual or short-term arrangements. Both partners must be consenting adults with a clear intention to marry.

2. Which sections under BNS correspond to Section 498A of IPC?
Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), provisions equivalent to Section 498A are mapped under Sections 85 and 86.

3. Will police immediately arrest an accused upon receiving a complaint?
No, the court reiterated strict adherence to the Arnesh Kumar guidelines, requiring police to perform a mandatory preliminary inquiry prior to any arrest.

4. Who bears the burden of proving that the live-in relationship was marriage-like?
The initial onus of proving that the cohabitation was in the nature of a marriage rests upon the female complainant.

https://trendkia.com/en/national/daheja-utpirana-kanuna-ka-dayara-barha-supreme-court-ka-phaisala-shadi-jaise-liva-ina-rileshanashipa-vali-mahilaon-ko-bhi-milegi-d-13489
TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.