# Supreme Court Issues Notice to Rahul Gandhi, Kharge, and Akhilesh Yadav Over Scuffle with Woman Journalist

> The Supreme Court has sought responses from the central government and key opposition leaders over an alleged scuffle with a woman journalist during a protest march. A hearing on the contempt petitions has been scheduled for November 23.

**Type:** article · **Category:** India · **Published:** 2026-11-03 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/national/mahila-patrakara-se-badasaluki-aura-avamanana-mamale-men-rahul-gandhi-kharge-aura-akhilesh-yadav-ko-adalata-ka-notisa-55631 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Supreme Court, Rahul Gandhi, Mallikarjun Kharge, Akhilesh Yadav, Woman Journalist, Contempt Petition, INDIA Alliance

The Supreme Court has taken serious note of petitions concerning an alleged scuffle with a woman journalist during an opposition foot march, as well as related pleas demanding contempt action. Notices have been formally issued by the top court to the central government, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav, and other concerned parties, seeking their formal replies on the matter.

## Disruption and Sloganeering During October 12 Protest March
The controversy stems from an agitation held on October 12, when leaders from the opposition INDIA alliance organised a foot march over allegations of vote theft. Rahul Gandhi, Mallikarjun Kharge, and Akhilesh Yadav, alongside several other political figures, marched directly towards the Supreme Court. The alleged manhandling of a female journalist took place during the media coverage of this demonstration, leading to widespread outrage and subsequent legal challenges.

## Contempt Petitions Scheduled for Hearing on November 23
Following the chaos, sloganeering, and reported misconduct during the march up to the court premises, multiple petitions were submitted requesting contempt proceedings against those involved. The petitioners contended that the actions during the gathering breached established norms and warranted judicial scrutiny. Taking cognizance of these submissions, the Supreme Court has set November 23 as the date to take up the matter for further hearing once all parties submit their responses.

## What this means for you
This judicial scrutiny highlights the enforcement of media safety standards and legal protocol around court zones during high-profile political demonstrations.

- **For Media Personnel and Citizens:** The proceedings emphasize the accountability required to protect on-duty journalists during public protests. A definitive stance by the court could reinforce protection standards for reporters covering sensitive political events.
- **For Political Organisations:** The notice requires political parties to enforce stricter discipline among supporters during marches and gatherings. A failure to prevent disruption near judicial premises could invite tighter constraints on protest permissions.
- **For the Legal Calendar:** The respondents, including central authorities and political figures, must submit their formal affidavits before the scheduled hearing. The subsequent proceedings on November 23 will likely delineate the balance between peaceful protest and contempt.
- **For Public Administration:** Security agencies and administrative bodies may implement tighter crowd management and cordoning rules around high-security areas. This could lead to stricter regulations on the routes allowed for political demonstrations in the capital.

## Why this happened
The judicial notices were prompted by allegations of harassment against a female reporter covering a high-profile political march and subsequent claims of courtroom contempt.

- **Immediate Cause:** During an October 12 foot march protesting alleged vote theft, a woman journalist covering the event was reportedly jostled and subjected to misconduct. The incident led to multiple legal pleas urging the Supreme Court to initiate contempt proceedings over the disruption.
- **Underlying Factors:** The protest, led by senior opposition leaders, headed straight towards the Supreme Court premises, during which sloganeering and disorder were alleged. Petitioners approached the judiciary contending that the protest overstepped permissible limits and breached administrative protocols.
- **Procedural Status:** The apex court has not arrived at a final finding but has formally sought affidavits from the Union government and the named political leaders. The court will examine all formal responses and hear arguments on the matter on November 23.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. To whom has the Supreme Court issued notices in this case?
The Supreme Court has issued notices seeking responses from the central government, Rahul Gandhi, Mallikarjun Kharge, Akhilesh Yadav, and other concerned parties.

### 2. What specific incident prompted these legal petitions?
The petitions concern an alleged scuffle involving a woman journalist covering a protest march and alleged sloganeering near the court premises.

### 3. What was the objective behind the October 12 protest march?
Leaders of the opposition alliance held the march to protest against alleged vote theft, walking up to the Supreme Court.

### 4. When is the Supreme Court scheduled to hear the matter next?
The Supreme Court has scheduled the next hearing on the alleged ruckus and contempt pleas for November 23.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._