# Devendra Fadnavis Slams Opposition Over Supreme Court March And CJI Meeting Demand

> Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has strongly criticized the opposition for organizing a march to the Supreme Court and demanding a meeting with the Chief Justice. He accused them of trying to undermine judicial institutions and erode public trust.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Politics · **Published:** 2026-10-12 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/politics/devendra-fadnavis-slams-opposition-over-supreme-court-march-and-cji-meeting-demand-47008 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Devendra Fadnavis, Supreme Court, Chief Justice, Opposition, Politics, Maharashtra

Political tensions escalated as Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis launched a sharp attack on the opposition on October 12, accusing them of systematically damaging the image of judicial institutions and attempting to erode public faith in them. His remarks come in the wake of opposition parties announcing a march to the Supreme Court scheduled for Monday, demanding an end to alleged vote thefts and calling for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar.

## Support For The Chief Justice Stand
According to reports, senior Congress figures Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge had sought an appointment to meet with Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant. However, the CJI declined to meet them regarding the allegations of vote theft, noting that similar matters were already sub judice before the Supreme Court. Speaking to journalists in Nagpur, Fadnavis criticized the opposition decision to stage a march toward the apex court, labeling it unconstitutional and alleging that opposition leaders resorted to derogatory language after their meeting request was turned down.

## Questioning Constitutional Propriety
Fadnavis asserted that those who harbor grievances should approach the courts and fight their legal battles within the proper judicial framework rather than resorting to street protests. He reiterated that the actions of the opposition demonstrate a fundamental lack of faith in the constitution. Questioning the logic behind the planned protests, Fadnavis asked how any political leader could expect the Chief Justice of India to meet marching protesters, emphasizing that no constitutional provision mandates such meetings and that the CJI acted in strict accordance with the law.

## What this means for you
This political controversy carries significant implications for public discourse and institutional stability across the country.

- **Across India:** Heightened friction between major political entities and judicial bodies creates public debate regarding the boundaries of institutional authority. Such standoffs can influence public perceptions of democratic checks and balances.
- **In Maharashtra:** The strong statements made by the state leadership are likely to trigger localized political reactions and intensified counter-rallies among party workers. This could lead to a sharper division in the regional political landscape.

## Why this happened
This political confrontation erupted after opposition factions raised serious concerns regarding electoral transparency and organized protests against the Chief Election Commissioner.

- **Meeting Declined:** The situation escalated significantly after the Chief Justice refused an appointment to the visiting political delegation because identical legal issues were already under judicial review.
- **Constitutional Norms:** Established judicial protocols generally prevent heads of the judiciary from engaging in direct discussions on active litigations with political figures to preserve institutional independence.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. Which opposition action did Devendra Fadnavis criticize?
He criticized the opposition decision to stage a march to the Supreme Court and demand meetings with the Chief Justice.

### 2. What were the primary demands behind the opposition march?
The opposition demanded an end to alleged vote thefts and called for the resignation of the Chief Election Commissioner.

### 3. Which leaders sought an appointment with the CJI?
Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge sought an appointment with the Chief Justice of India.

### 4. Why did the CJI decline the meeting request?
The CJI declined because similar matters were already pending adjudication before the Supreme Court.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._