# Election Commission Fact-Checks Rahul Gandhi over Form 6 Allegations, Terms Claims Misleading

> The Election Commission of India has issued a fact-check rejecting remarks made by Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi regarding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar as misleading.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Politics · **Published:** 2026-10-05 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/politics/phorma-6-vivada-para-election-commission-ka-palatavara-rahul-gandhi-ke-aropon-ko-bataya-bhramaka-43466 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Election Commission, Rahul Gandhi, Gyanesh Kumar, Supreme Court, Congress, Form 6, SIR, Fact Check

Tensions surrounding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) and demands for the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar have intensified, triggering widespread political demonstrations. Protesters representing multiple groups, including the NSUI, gathered at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi to register their opposition. The ongoing dispute has also reached the highest judicial forum, with the Supreme Court issuing a formal notice to the Election Commission of India and listing the matter for hearing next week. Amid escalating rhetoric from the opposition, Congress MP and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi launched a direct attack on Gyanesh Kumar, prompting the poll body to issue an official fact-check to rebut his allegations.

## Rahul Gandhi Alleges Unilateral Changes to Form 6
Voicing objections over the conduct of the revision process, Rahul Gandhi took to X to post that it had been proved without doubt that Gyanesh Kumar unilaterally and illegally altered Form 6. The Congress leader accused the poll chief of misusing his office to benefit the BJP, declaring that everyone involved in what he characterized as a criminal assault on Indian democracy would be held accountable. To substantiate his argument, he cited point three of a previously issued Election Commission press statement, which noted that the Supreme Court had upheld the declaration attached to Form 6 for the SIR, while standard forms under the Registration of Electors Rules 1960 remain applicable during non-SIR periods.

> 

## Election Commission Rebuts Claims through Official Fact-Check
Responding directly to the social media post, the Election Commission shared a fact-check on X, describing the assertions as misleading. The commission presented two specific clarifications to refute allegations of unilateral conduct. First, it highlighted that the directive governing the SIR in Bihar, issued on June 24, 2025, was approved unanimously by the entire commission rather than being an individual executive order. Furthermore, the poll body stated that the Supreme Court of India upheld the validity of that exact order in its ruling delivered on May 27, 2026.

Addressing the documentation reference, the Election Commission cited point 1(iii) from its Press Note 120 dated September 26, 2026. The notification explicitly reiterated that the Supreme Court had already affirmed the declaration accompanying Form 6 for the SIR. By pointing to judicial confirmation and unanimous institutional consensus, the commission countered the claim that the procedural guidelines constituted an unlawful or partisan modification of electoral regulations.

## Congress Plans Nationwide 'Save Democracy March' and Protests
Agitations demanding the withdrawal of the SIR and the removal of Gyanesh Kumar have continued across several locations for four consecutive days. In response to the standoff, senior Congress leaders, including Mallikarjun Kharge, Rahul Gandhi, and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, convened a high-level strategy meeting in the national capital. The party resolved to launch an extensive 'Save Democracy March' spanning multiple states. Under this outreach program, party representatives intend to conduct bicycle drives, motorcycle rallies, and foot marches to compile details of voters whose names were deleted during the verification exercise.

These collected records will form the centerpiece of a major joint opposition demonstration scheduled for November 1 at Ramlila Maidan in New Delhi, featuring leaders from across the INDIA alliance. Additionally, on November 25 and 26, separate foot journeys originating from six distinct locations will converge on the capital. As an immediate escalation, the party also scheduled a direct march from Parliament to the headquarters of the Election Commission.

>

## What this means for you
The ongoing clash over voter list verification directly influences citizen awareness and voter registry procedures across multiple states.

- **Across India:** Voters should independently verify their electoral registry status to ensure their names remain active on official electoral rolls. Citizens believing their names were wrongfully omitted can submit documentation during outreach drives organized ahead of upcoming hearings.
- **In New Delhi:** Commuters around Central Delhi, Jantar Mantar, and Ramlila Maidan will face significant route diversions due to planned protests, including the massive rally set for November 1. Increased security deployments around Parliament and the Election Commission office will cause transit delays.
- **In Bihar:** Electors reviewed under the June 24, 2025 SIR directives receive confirmed legal certainty regarding Form 6 documentation as upheld by the Supreme Court. Newly registered voters must ensure compliance with existing declaration rules established for verification exercises.
- **For Political Workers:** Opposition cadres participating in foot marches from six locations on November 25 and 26 will mobilize regional data collection. Activists will systematically register voter complaints to compile records of excluded electors.

## Why this happened
The conflict erupted over procedural directives concerning Form 6 under the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) and escalating political opposition against the Chief Election Commissioner.

- **Immediate Cause:** Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi claimed on social media that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar made unlawful and unilateral modifications to Form 6, prompting an official fact-check from the election authority.
- **Procedural Background:** The Election Commission issued a directive on June 24, 2025, for SIR in Bihar requiring a specific declaration with Form 6, an order passed with the unanimous consent of the entire commission.
- **Judicial Review:** Although the Supreme Court validated the order on May 27, 2026, fresh petitions led the apex court to issue a notice to the Election Commission with hearings scheduled for next week.
- **Political Mobilization:** Opposition parties allege that large numbers of legitimate electors were struck off voter lists, driving four days of sustained street demonstrations demanding procedural rollbacks and personnel changes.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. What allegations did Rahul Gandhi level against the Chief Election Commissioner?
Rahul Gandhi alleged that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar acted illegally and unilaterally by altering Form 6 to favor the ruling party.

### 2. How did the Election Commission respond in its fact-check?
The commission termed the claim misleading, clarifying that the SIR order was approved unanimously and was upheld by the Supreme Court on May 27, 2026.

### 3. What is the current status of the matter in the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court has issued a notice to the Election Commission regarding the dispute and is scheduled to hear the matter next week.

### 4. What protest programs has the Congress planned?
Congress plans a nationwide Save Democracy March, a demonstration from Parliament to the Election Commission, and a major rally at Ramlila Maidan on November 1.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._