# Legal Troubles Mount for Bihar's Prominent Political Family: Full Details of Cases Against Lalu Prasad Yadav, Tejashwi, and Tej Pratap Following Latest Arrest

> Following the recent arrest of Tej Pratap Yadav, the extensive legal cases against his family have returned to the spotlight. Electoral affidavits show Tej Pratap faces 8 cases and Tejashwi Yadav faces 22, while their father Lalu Prasad Yadav remains on bail after being convicted in fodder scam cases.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Politics · **Published:** 2026-07-26 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/politics/bihar-ke-kaddavara-parivara-para-kanuni-shiknja-tej-pratap-ki-giraphtari-ke-bada-samane-aya-lalu-prasad-yadav-aura-tejashwi-yadav--10536 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Lalu Prasad Yadav, Tej Pratap Yadav, Tejashwi Yadav, RJD, Criminal Cases, Bihar Politics, Fodder Scam

Following the recent arrest of Tej Pratap Yadav and his subsequent transfer to Beur Jail in Patna, the spotlight has once again turned sharply toward the extensive list of legal cases pending against the members of Bihar's prominent political family. There is immense public interest regarding the exact nature and status of the allegations surrounding this influential political dynasty. A detailed and clear breakdown of these legal challenges emerges from the official affidavits submitted to the Election Commission of India during the 2025 Bihar Assembly elections. According to the data compiled from these mandatory electoral disclosures, Tej Pratap Yadav officially declared 8 active criminal cases against himself, which include highly serious allegations such as murder and attempt to murder. On the other hand, the legal predicament of his younger brother, the prominent RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav, is even more extensive, with his 2025 electoral affidavit declaring a total of 22 pending criminal cases. Meanwhile, the legal status of the family patriarch, Lalu Prasad Yadav, stands on an entirely different footing. Unlike his sons, who are currently classified as accused individuals undergoing trial, the senior politician has already been convicted and sentenced in multiple fodder scam cases, and is currently out of prison on bail while his appeals remain pending.

##  Tej Pratap Yadav: Serious Allegations and the Latest Electoral Declarations 
During the 2025 Bihar Assembly elections, when Tej Pratap Yadav filed his nomination papers for the Mahua assembly constituency, he provided a comprehensive disclosure of his pending legal disputes in his mandatory affidavit. The records available on the MyNeta platform indicate that he faces 8 distinct criminal cases. The charges registered against him involve several severe sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Most notable among these is Section 302 of the IPC, which pertains to the offense of murder. Additionally, his affidavit lists charges under Section 307 of the IPC, which deals with the attempt to commit murder. The legal documents also register charges under Section 498A, a law designed to address cruelty inflicted upon a married woman by her husband or his relatives. Furthermore, Section 333 of the IPC, which involves voluntarily causing grievous hurt to deter a public servant from discharging their duty, is also included in the list of pending trials. However, legal experts emphasize that the mere registration of a case or its mention in an election affidavit does not amount to a declaration of guilt. These matters are currently navigating the judicial system, and must be viewed strictly as pending allegations until a competent court delivers its final verdict.

##  The Patna Kotwali Police Station Case and Recent Protests 
The application of Section 307 of the IPC (attempt to murder) has once again generated significant attention following Tej Pratap Yadav's latest arrest. This is not the first instance where he has faced such a serious charge, as his 2025 election affidavit already highlighted a prior case involving Section 307. This particular case dates back to 2021 and was registered at the Kotwali Police Station in Patna. The scope of that older case extended far beyond the charge of attempted murder, encompassing a broad range of other IPC sections. These included Section 147 and Section 149 for participating in an unlawful assembly, Section 341 for wrongful restraint, and Section 342 for wrongful confinement. Additionally, the case cited Section 323 for voluntarily causing hurt, Section 333 for causing grievous hurt to a public servant, Sections 337 and 338 for endangering the life or personal safety of others through rash or negligent acts, Section 353 for assault or criminal force to deter a public servant from duty, and Section 504 for intentional insult with intent to provoke a breach of the peace. More recently, Tej Pratap Yadav was arrested by the police during a political protest organized over the controversies surrounding the NEET examinations. Following this latest arrest, authorities have reportedly invoked Section 307 of the IPC once again, underscoring that facing allegations of attempted murder is a recurring legal hurdle for the politician rather than a novel development.

##  Cases Stemming from Political Demonstrations and Disruption of Public Duty 
A closer inspection of the overall list of cases registered against Tej Pratap Yadav reveals that the vast majority of these legal actions are intrinsically linked to his active political career. As a prominent public figure and political organizer, he has regularly participated in numerous demonstrations, rallies, protest marches, and election campaigns, during which confrontations with local administration and law enforcement occurred. These cases are distributed across various police stations in Patna, Jehanabad, and Mahua. The core allegations in these files focus primarily on the unlawful assembly of crowds without administrative permission, defiance of official prohibitory orders issued by government authorities, and the physical obstruction of public servants trying to perform their duties. Additionally, charges related to violations of the Model Code of Conduct during election cycles are also documented. In the legal and political landscape of India, such cases are generally categorized as political in nature, commonly arising from active participation in democratic protests and public agitations.

##  Matrimonial Dispute: Domestic Violence and Family Court Proceedings 
In addition to the public and political lawsuits, Tej Pratap Yadav's personal life has also been entangled in prolonged legal battles. His domestic dispute with his wife, Aishwarya Rai, has been a subject of intense media scrutiny and political discussion in Bihar for several years. A civil suit seeking a divorce remains pending before the Family Court of Patna, where both sides continue to participate in ongoing legal proceedings. Parallel to the divorce petition, his wife also initiated a case against him under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. This matter is likewise actively moving through the judicial process. Consequently, Tej Pratap Yadav is simultaneously managing two distinct fronts of legal challenges, one involving political and criminal prosecutions, and the other concerning highly publicized domestic and matrimonial litigation.

##  Tejashwi Yadav: Doubling of Registered Cases in a Five-Year Span 
In contrast to his older brother, the RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav faces an even larger volume of legal cases. While submitting his nomination papers for the Raghopur constituency during the 2025 Bihar Assembly elections, the younger sibling declared 22 criminal cases in his mandatory affidavit. This represents a significant increase compared to his declarations from the 2020 assembly elections, where he had listed 11 pending cases. This comparison reveals that the number of registered cases against him has exactly doubled over a five-year period. The charges listed in Tejashwi Yadav's 2025 affidavit span various financial and penal offenses. These include sections related to cheating, forgery of documents, criminal breach of trust, and criminal intimidation. Just as in the case of his brother, the presence of these pending files does not imply conviction. The verified records of MyNeta confirm that as of the 2025 election filing, there is no record of Tejashwi Yadav being convicted or sentenced by any court of law in connection with these cases. The matters remain in the pre-trial or trial stages without any final judicial determination of guilt.

##  Lalu Prasad Yadav: Fodder Scam Convictions and the Legal Complexities of Bail 
The legal situation of the patriarch, Lalu Prasad Yadav, is fundamentally different and far more severe than that of his two sons. While the younger generation is currently dealing with allegations and trials, the senior RJD leader has already been formally convicted by special courts in multiple cases related to the multi-crore fodder scam. Although he is a convicted individual who has been sentenced to prison terms, he is currently out of jail on regular bail, which was granted primarily on medical and humanitarian grounds. Recently, a significant legal milestone occurred when the Supreme Court of India refused to entertain a petition seeking the cancellation of his bail in the Deoghar treasury case. While declining to revoke his bail, the Supreme Court directed the Jharkhand High Court to expedite the process and deliver its final decision on Lalu Prasad Yadav's appeals against his convictions within a strict period of six months. This directive highlights that the legal proceedings surrounding his convictions and his bail are still very much active and subject to final adjudication by higher judicial bodies.

##  Understanding the Legal Distinction: Accused vs Convicted 
A comparative analysis of the legal status of these three members of the family highlights critical principles of the Indian legal framework. While Lalu Prasad Yadav has been tried, found guilty, and is currently on bail pending appeal, his sons, Tej Pratap Yadav and Tejashwi Yadav, remain in the category of the accused. Despite Tejashwi Yadav having 22 cases and Tej Pratap Yadav having 8 cases declared against them, they are protected by the fundamental jurisprudential principle that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. To understand the true legal position of any individual, it is essential to distinguish between the different stages of the judicial process: whether a matter is merely at the stage of a police First Information Report (FIR), whether formal charges have been framed by a judge, or whether a full trial has concluded with a formal conviction and sentencing. In this family's case, this precise distinction between a convict on bail and individuals facing trial shapes their respective legal trajectories and political narratives.

## What this means for you
- **In Bihar:** The mounting legal cases against this prominent political family will directly affect upcoming election strategies and the state's political landscape.
- **At the National Level:** It will enhance public awareness regarding the criminal disclosures of political leaders in their election affidavits, promoting transparency in democracy.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. Which section has been applied to Tej Pratap Yadav in his recent arrest?
Following his recent arrest during a protest related to the NEET controversy, Section 307 of the IPC (attempt to murder) has reportedly been invoked against Tej Pratap Yadav.

### 2. How many criminal cases are registered against Tejashwi Yadav according to his election affidavit?
According to his 2025 assembly election affidavit, RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav has 22 criminal cases declared against him, which is double the 11 cases he declared in 2020.

### 3. Is Lalu Prasad Yadav currently in jail?
No, Lalu Prasad Yadav is currently out of prison on regular bail, although he has been convicted in multiple fodder scam cases.

### 4. What serious charges are declared in Tej Pratap Yadav's affidavit?
His affidavit includes serious charges such as murder (Section 302), attempt to murder (Section 307), cruelty to a woman by her husband or relatives (Section 498A), and causing grievous hurt to deter a public servant (Section 333).

### 5. What directive did the Supreme Court give to the Jharkhand High Court regarding Lalu Prasad Yadav's case?
While refusing to cancel Lalu Prasad Yadav's bail, the Supreme Court directed the Jharkhand High Court to decide on his appeals against conviction within six months.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._