{
  "type": "article",
  "title": "Mahua Moitra Suffers Blow As Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Plea Over Nadia Circuit House Eviction",
  "summary": "The Supreme Court declined to entertain Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra's petition challenging her eviction from the Nadia circuit house in West Bengal. Chief Justice Surya Kant noted that the matter could be heard by the High Court instead.",
  "content": "New Delhi. Trinamool Congress Member of Parliament Mahua Moitra faced a setback in the Supreme Court on Monday as the apex court refused to entertain her petition against the eviction from a circuit house in Nadia, West Bengal. Mahua Moitra had approached the highest court of the country to challenge the local authorities' directive to vacate the circuit house. During Monday's proceedings, Chief Justice Surya Kant declined to take up the matter, stating that the petition could very well be heard by the High Court.\n\nThe Eviction Controversy At Nadia Circuit House\nThe TMC parliamentarian alleged that the district administration of Nadia in West Bengal acted in blatant violation of judicial orders by removing her from her designated official accommodation inside the district circuit house. The incident dates back to August 14. Tensions flared when the local administration approached her late at night, demanding that she vacate the premises immediately. According to Mahua Moitra, she had arrived at the circuit house at around 6.15 pm on August 14, where she was allotted her regular room and served tea and meals.\n\nLate-Night Phone Calls And WhatsApp Directives\nShe claimed that at 9.47 pm, the Additional District Magistrate called her and instructed her to leave the premises, allegedly mentioning that the orders had come from above. Shortly afterward, a WhatsApp message arrived from the Deputy Commissioner containing an order dated August 12, which cited maintenance and cleaning work as the reason for the eviction. Disturbed by these sudden developments, she decided to approach the judiciary.\n\nArguments Regarding High Court Orders\nRepresenting the petitioner, her counsel argued that local officials had acted in direct defiance of an existing order issued by the Calcutta High Court. The lawyer maintained that the incident raises crucial questions concerning federalism and warrants an impartial inquiry. It was emphasized that these developments unfolded even though the High Court had already put safety directions in place. However, despite these arguments, the Supreme Court declined to hear the matter on Monday.\n\nWhat this means for you\nAcross India: The case highlights legal questions regarding the administrative powers of local authorities and the rights of public representatives.\n\nIn West Bengal: It draws attention to local administrative protocols and the management of official circuit houses in districts like Nadia.\n\nQuestions & Answers\n\n1. Which petition did the Supreme Court refuse to hear for Mahua Moitra?\nThe Supreme Court declined to hear her petition challenging the order to vacate the circuit house in Nadia, West Bengal.\n\n2. What did the Chief Justice say while refusing the hearing?\nChief Justice Surya Kant stated that the court would not consider the matter as the High Court could also hear it.\n\n3. On which date did the eviction incident take place?\nThe incident occurred on August 14 when the administration asked her to vacate the circuit house late at night.\n\n4. What allegation was made by Mahua Moitra's lawyer?\nThe lawyer alleged that local authorities took action in defiance of an existing Calcutta High Court order.",
  "url": "https://trendkia.com/en/politics/mahua-moitra-ko-suprima-korta-se-jhataka-nadiya-circuit-house-khali-karane-ke-mamale-men-sunavai-se-inakara-21127",
  "category": "Politics",
  "publishedAt": "2026-08-24",
  "tags": [
    "Mahua Moitra",
    "Supreme Court",
    "West Bengal",
    "Nadia",
    "Circuit House",
    "TMC"
  ],
  "language": "en",
  "site": "TrendKia"
}