Supreme Court Refuses Direct Intervention in WB Rebel MLA Case, Directs TMC to Approach High Court The Supreme Court declined to order the West Bengal Speaker to fast-track disqualification proceedings against 10 rebel MLAs, advising TMC to approach the Calcutta High Court instead. The Supreme Court has declined to intervene directly in a plea filed by the Trinamool Congress (TMC) seeking fast-track disqualification of rebel legislators in West Bengal. Rejecting the party's petition, the top court stated that it would not issue directions to the State Assembly Speaker at this juncture, directing the ruling party to first approach the Calcutta High Court for appropriate relief. Supreme Court Directs TMC to Approach High Court A Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi heard the matter on Thursday. Dismissing the petition, the bench emphasized that at this stage, it is proper and appropriate for the petitioner to pursue the matter before the Calcutta High Court rather than directly seeking intervention from the apex court. The ruling gives TMC the liberty to file a fresh petition before the High Court. High Court Division Bench Requested for Expedited Hearing While dismissing the appeal, the Supreme Court made a specific request to the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court. The apex bench asked the Chief Justice to place the matter before a Division Bench for an early hearing and swift disposal. This recommendation aims to resolve the pending legal uncertainty surrounding the status of the rebel MLAs without unnecessary delay. 10 Rebel MLAs Facing Disqualification Proceedings The legal action was initiated by TMC MLA Shobhandeb Chattopadhyay, who sought a judicial mandate directing the Assembly Speaker to quickly decide on the pending disqualification petitions. The proceedings target 10 rebel legislators who parted ways with party discipline. Prominent among those named is Ritabrata Banerjee, who holds the position of Leader of the Opposition in the West Bengal Legislative Assembly. Background of the Anti-Defection Petitions The disqualification proceedings against the 10 legislators were formally initiated under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution, which deals with anti-defection regulations. These petitions were filed in July 2026 following allegations of anti-party conduct. TMC has been pressing for an immediate ruling on their status, but the decision will now rest with the proceedings in the Calcutta High Court. What this means for you This judicial directive carries significant implications for the political landscape and court procedure in West Bengal. • Across India: The decision reinforces the constitutional principle that High Courts should primarily handle state legislative disputes before Supreme Court intervention. It sets a precedent for how anti-defection disputes involving state assembly speakers are routed through the judicial system. • In West Bengal: The legal battle between the Trinamool Congress and its rebel MLAs will now shift to a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court. The decision leaves the constitutional status of 10 rebel legislators, including the Leader of the Opposition, dependent on the outcome of the High Court proceedings. Why this happened The Supreme Court chose not to intervene directly and instead redirected the petition to the Calcutta High Court based on established judicial procedures. • Constitutional Hierarchy: The apex court emphasized that state-level legislative and anti-defection matters should ideally be adjudicated by the relevant High Court before reaching the Supreme Court. • Appropriate Judicial Forum: The bench noted that at this stage, approaching the Calcutta High Court was the most suitable legal avenue for the petitioner. • Need for Speedy Disposal: Recognizing that anti-defection petitions against 10 MLAs were pending, the apex court requested the High Court Chief Justice to constitute a Division Bench for early resolution. Questions & Answers 1. What did the Supreme Court decide on TMC's petition? The Supreme Court declined to intervene directly and directed the Trinamool Congress to approach the Calcutta High Court. 2. What was requested in the petition regarding the Speaker? The petition requested directions for the West Bengal Speaker to expeditiously decide on the disqualification of 10 rebel MLAs. 3. Which Supreme Court bench heard the matter? The matter was heard by a bench comprising CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi. 4. Who filed the petition in the Supreme Court? The petition was filed by TMC MLA Shobhandeb Chattopadhyay. 5. Who are among the 10 rebel MLAs facing disqualification? The 10 rebel MLAs include Ritabrata Banerjee, who is recognized as the Leader of the Opposition in the West Bengal Assembly. https://trendkia.com/en/politics/bngala-men-bagi-vidhayakon-ki-ayogyata-para-supreme-court-ka-dakhala-se-inakara-tmc-ko-kalakatta-high-court-bheja-56980 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.