Plea Seeking FIR Against Nishu And Sanjay Azad Over Offensive Posts Listed Before Patiala House Court A petition seeking an FIR against Nishu Azad and Sanjay Azad for alleged objectionable online remarks regarding Hindu deities is set to be heard at Delhi's Patiala House Court. A legal petition seeking the registration of a criminal case against Nishu Azad and his father Sanjay Azad has reached the Patiala House Court in Delhi over allegedly objectionable social media remarks targeted at Hindu deities. The matter has been formally placed before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, with proceedings scheduled for hearing on September 23, 2026. Supreme Court Advocate Moved Court After Police Complaint The judicial action follows an initiative taken by Amita Sachdeva, an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court. Prior to moving the court, she had submitted a formal complaint on September 5 at the New Delhi District Cyber Police Station requesting that an FIR be lodged against both individuals. The petitioner approached the magisterial court after the police authorities did not initiate the expected action on the complaint. According to the petition, derogatory and offensive material was posted through Nishu Azad's social media handle targeting revered Hindu figures. The plea specifically cites posts that allegedly made controversial references to Lord Shiva, Lord Krishna, Goddess Saraswati, and Goddess Durga. Invocation of BNS Sections on Communal Harmony The petitioner has sought legal action under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) along with relevant provisions of the Information Technology Act. The primary invoking includes Section 196 of the BNS, which deals with promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, and Section 299, which penalises deliberate acts intended to outrage religious feelings. Furthermore, reference has also been made to Section 353 of the BNS within the legal submission. The core focus of the allegations, however, remains centered on the contentious social media output and the resulting hurt to religious sentiments. Whether these penal sections will be formally applied depends on the forthcoming judicial review and police assessment. Preservation of Digital Footprints and IP Logs Highlighting the critical role of electronic data in cyber offences, the application urges the court to ensure the immediate preservation of digital materials. This includes securing the exact social media posts, platform records, associated IP logs, and corresponding technical metadata. The plea highlights that preserving these electronic footprints without delay is vital for any subsequent investigation, preventing potential deletion, tampering, or loss of primary electronic evidence before the court evaluates the matter further. What this means for you This court proceeding serves as a critical indicator of how judicial authorities scrutinise offensive digital commentary and online hate speech under updated criminal laws. • Across India: Users posting objectionable content targeting any faith risk severe action under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act. Digital citizens must exercise caution as online remarks carry enforceable legal consequences regarding communal harmony. • In Delhi: Increased judicial oversight on complaints filed at district cyber police stations can accelerate police action on cyber offences. Citizens seeking legal remedy gain clarity on pursuing court-monitored FIR applications when initial police responses stall. • For Online Evidence: The demand to preserve IP logs and digital footprints demonstrates that deleting controversial posts does not erase evidence. Electronic records remain traceable and form the bedrock of cyber investigations in court. • On Legal Frameworks: The matter highlights the emerging judicial application of newly enacted BNS provisions regarding religious disharmony. Precedents set here will define how courts evaluate social media misconduct under updated statutes. Why this happened The legal controversy originated from alleged objectionable remarks regarding Hindu deities on social media and the subsequent delay in registering a formal police case. • Direct Trigger: Content deemed offensive toward Lord Shiva, Lord Krishna, Goddess Saraswati, and Goddess Durga was reportedly shared from Nishu Azad's account. This prompted allegations of deliberate insult to religious sentiments. • Recourse to Court: Advocate Amita Sachdeva approached the Patiala House Court after lodging an initial complaint on September 5 with the New Delhi District Cyber Police Station. The court was moved because the police had not initiated the desired FIR. • Concern Over Digital Footprints: Due to the risk of social media posts and electronic logs being altered or deleted, the petitioner sought urgent judicial directions to preserve technical evidence for investigation. Questions & Answers 1. Against whom has the petition been filed in Patiala House Court? The plea has been filed against Nishu Azad and his father Sanjay Azad over allegedly derogatory social media posts. 2. Which deities are specifically referenced in the complaint? The petition points to contentious posts concerning Lord Shiva, Lord Krishna, Goddess Saraswati, and Goddess Durga. 3. When is the matter scheduled for hearing in court? The hearing is listed before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Patiala House Court on September 23, 2026. 4. Under which sections has the petitioner demanded an FIR? The application seeks an FIR under BNS Sections 196, 299, and 353, alongside relevant provisions of the IT Act. 5. When was the initial complaint submitted to the police? The complainant originally approached the New Delhi District Cyber Police Station on September 5. https://trendkia.com/en/punjab/dharmika-bhavanaen-bharakane-ke-aropon-men-ghire-nishu-aura-sanjay-azad-ephaaiara-ki-arji-para-patiala-house-court-karega-sunavai-36440 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.