Congress MLA Shrawan Kumar Son Jayprakash and Bank Manager Booked in Jhunjhunu for Alleged Forged High Court Order in Surajgarh Polls Police in Rajasthan's Jhunjhunu district have registered an FIR against Congress MLA Shrawan Kumar's son Jayprakash and bank manager Umesh Bhooker for allegedly submitting a forged High Court order during Surajgarh Panchayat Samiti elections. A major legal and administrative controversy has erupted in the Jhunjhunu district of Rajasthan following allegations that a forged High Court order was submitted during the Surajgarh Panchayat Samiti election process. Police authorities have registered a formal criminal case of fraud and forgery against Jayprakash, the son of local Congress MLA Shrawan Kumar, alongside Umesh Bhooker, an official working as a manager in a nationalised public sector bank. Jhunjhunu District Collector Dr. Arun Garg confirmed the registration of the FIR, underscoring the severity with which the administrative machinery is treating the suspected misuse of judicial documents in an active election. Criminal Complaint Lodged by Surajgarh Returning Officer The criminal proceedings were initiated on the basis of a formal complaint submitted by the Returning Officer (RO) of Surajgarh. According to the election official, an order purportedly originating from the High Court was presented during the ongoing election procedures. Upon scrutiny, the document was suspected of being counterfeit and fabricated, prompting immediate administrative intervention. Acting on the Returning Officer's official complaint, the police booked both Jayprakash and Umesh Bhooker under statutory sections dealing with forgery and cheating, thereby launching an exhaustive criminal inquiry into the incident. Profile of the Accused and Specific Roles Under Investigation Among the individuals named in the police complaint, co-accused Umesh Bhooker is a native of Goriyan village located within Jhunjhunu district. Professional records indicate that he currently serves as a branch manager at a nationalised government bank in the neighbouring state of Haryana. Investigating officers are presently examining the operational trail behind the controversial document to determine who drafted the alleged counterfeit order, who arranged the forged seals and signatures, and how it came to be physically submitted before the election authorities. The investigation aims to establish the exact extent of complicity and individual accountability of both named accused. High Court Takes Cognisance and Demands Registrar's Inquiry Report The High Court took serious judicial cognisance of the matter after concerns were raised regarding the presentation of an allegedly fabricated court directive to influence statutory electoral functions. Addressing the gravity of the situation, the court directed its Registrar to conduct a thorough inquiry and submit a detailed report within three days. The crucial hearing on this matter is scheduled to take place today, November 2. The factual findings compiled by the Registrar are expected to shed light on whether any genuine case record existed or if the document presented during the polls was an outright fabrication. Upcoming Court Hearing to Determine Future Legal Trajectory The proceedings scheduled for November 2 in the High Court will serve as a decisive milestone in the ongoing dispute. The Registrar's comprehensive assessment will officially establish whether the order tendered during the Surajgarh Panchayat Samiti elections was authentic, doctored, or completely counterfeit. Meanwhile, local police authorities are actively gathering documentary evidence and witness statements based on the Returning Officer's FIR. The ultimate legal consequences for both Jayprakash and Umesh Bhooker, including potential coercive action, will depend heavily on the judicial directives issued by the High Court and the outcome of the police investigation. What this means for you This case directly highlights the critical need for verifying judicial directives during democratic electoral exercises. • Across India: The incident reinforces strict verification protocols for any court order submitted to election authorities across all tiers of governance. Legal experts and election bodies are likely to mandate digital cross-checks to eliminate the risk of counterfeit orders swaying nominations or voting. • In Jhunjhunu: Local residents and candidates in Surajgarh will closely monitor how this case impacts the legitimacy and final outcome of the Panchayat Samiti elections. The local administration has already tightened administrative surveillance around electoral scrutiny and returning officer procedures. • For Election Officials: Returning officers will now require authenticated digital or registry-verified copies before acting on interim court relief presented by candidates. This administrative caution prevents procedural disruptions caused by bogus legal representations. • For Citizens and Candidates: Aspiring candidates face a stern warning that submitting unverified or fabricated judicial paperwork results in immediate criminal prosecution. It assures voters that state machinery will protect the constitutional integrity of grassroots democratic institutions. Why this happened The case emerged after an allegedly counterfeit High Court directive was submitted during the Surajgarh Panchayat Samiti election process to influence procedural matters. • Direct Trigger: An order ostensibly issued under the authority of the High Court was presented before the Surajgarh Returning Officer during election proceedings. Suspecting the document to be bogus, the returning officer lodged an official police complaint alleging criminal deception. • Administrative Confirmation: District Collector Dr. Arun Garg formally confirmed the registration of an FIR naming Congress MLA Shrawan Kumar's son Jayprakash and bank manager Umesh Bhooker. Police subsequently opened a probe to trace the origin, creation, and handling of the controversial document. • Judicial Oversight: The High Court took immediate notice of its name being misused in an electoral contest and instructed its Registrar to conduct an internal inquiry. The court ordered the submission of a comprehensive report within three days to establish whether any tampering or fabrication had taken place. Questions & Answers 1. Who has been booked in the Surajgarh Panchayat Samiti election case in Jhunjhunu? Police have registered an FIR against Congress MLA Shrawan Kumar's son Jayprakash and bank manager Umesh Bhooker. 2. What are the specific allegations against Jayprakash and Umesh Bhooker? They are accused of presenting an allegedly forged High Court order before the Returning Officer during the Surajgarh Panchayat Samiti elections. 3. What is the background of co-accused Umesh Bhooker? Umesh Bhooker is a native of Goriyan village in Jhunjhunu district and currently serves as a manager in a nationalised bank in Haryana. 4. What directive did the High Court issue regarding the alleged fake order? Taking cognisance of the matter, the High Court directed its Registrar to submit an inquiry report within three days. 5. When is the High Court scheduled to hear the matter? The High Court is scheduled to conduct a crucial hearing on the matter on November 2, where the Registrar's findings will be reviewed. https://trendkia.com/en/rajasthan/surajgarh-pnchayata-samiti-chunava-men-high-court-ke-kathita-pharji-adesha-para-ghire-congress-mla-ke-putra-bank-manager-aura-jayp-54897 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.