Dispute Between Doctors at Mandrella Hospital in Jhunjhunu Triggers Notice to Senior Physician Over Alleged Intoxication A senior medical officer at Mandrella Community Health Centre in Jhunjhunu has received a formal show-cause notice following allegations of drunken misconduct inside the facility. The Community Health Centre located in Mandrella town of Rajasthan's Jhunjhunu district has been plunged into turmoil following an ugly internal confrontation among its medical personnel. Rather than patient care, the government healthcare facility has become the focus of intense scrutiny after footage capturing a confrontation between senior doctors began circulating widely across digital platforms. The development has cast a shadow over institutional discipline within the regional healthcare infrastructure and prompted sharp questions regarding the code of conduct observed by senior government doctors on active duty. Official Notice Issued Following Altercation in Administrative Room Taking a stringent view of the disruption, Dr. Pradeep Sharma, the medical officer in charge at the Mandrella Community Health Centre, has initiated formal administrative proceedings. Dr. Sharma issued an official office memorandum addressed to Dr. Ashok Kumar Nooniya, a senior medical officer stationed at the same hospital. The written communication explicitly calls upon Dr. Nooniya to submit a comprehensive written explanation regarding his alleged unruly conduct, insubordination, and creation of workplace chaos while on official duty hours. This measure represents a formal institutional attempt to curb rising indiscipline on hospital grounds. Allegations of Inebriation and Disruptive Behaviour on Duty The formal memorandum signed by Dr. Sharma details a series of disturbing occurrences within the hospital premises. According to the document, Dr. Ashok Kumar Nooniya entered the officer-in-charge room abruptly and without any scheduled reason or prior warning. Once inside, he allegedly initiated an unprovoked verbal confrontation with Dr. Sharma, using objectionable language and behaving aggressively. The most serious charge outlined in the official communication states that Dr. Nooniya displayed physical movements, speech patterns, and mannerisms that strongly indicated heavy alcohol intoxication while on duty. The prospect of a senior physician being intoxicated in a critical healthcare setting has caused significant alarm. Video Recording Secured as Definitive Evidence To ensure that the formal complaint rests on tangible documentation rather than conflicting oral testimonies, Dr. Pradeep Sharma confirmed that the confrontation was digitally recorded. When the alleged altercation unfolded inside the administrative chamber, a complete video recording of the encounter was captured and preserved. Dr. Sharma stated that this digital footage has been securely archived. He affirmed that the clip will be produced as indisputable evidence whenever departmental investigators or senior administrative authorities summon documentation during the inquiry. Two-Day Deadline and Warning of Strict Administrative Action In his formal communication, Dr. Sharma stressed that such hostile conduct blatantly violates government service codes, hospital decorum, and institutional ethics. Dr. Nooniya has been instructed to furnish his written response within two days, or 48 hours, of receiving the memorandum. The notice carries a stern warning emphasizing that failure to meet the specified timeline, or the submission of an unsatisfactory defence, will result in immediate escalation. In that event, a formal dossier seeking severe disciplinary proceedings under applicable civil services conduct rules will be forwarded to higher echelons of the health department. History of Previous Verbal Warnings and Demand for Strict Measures Providing additional background to the persistent conflict, Dr. Sharma disclosed that the latest incident is not an isolated breach of professional discipline. Dr. Nooniya had reportedly received multiple verbal cautions in the past concerning his on-duty conduct, professional attitude, and interactions within the hospital. However, those informal warnings produced no lasting corrective change, leading instead to repeated instances of workplace friction. Consequently, Dr. Sharma has formally appealed to higher authorities within the health department to intervene decisively, take official cognizance of the entire matter, and impose appropriate penalties to protect the integrity of public healthcare institutions. What this means for you The internal conflict between senior doctors threatens to disrupt daily medical operations and patient care delivery at the public health facility. • Across India: The incident may reinforce demands for stricter enforcement of service conduct rules and sobriety checks for healthcare professionals in public hospitals. Administrative oversight regarding professional decorum on duty is likely to intensify across state health departments. • In Jhunjhunu: Patients relying on the Mandrella Community Health Centre may face administrative delays and friction during routine outpatient and emergency visits. Local residents might experience temporary disruptions in consultations while the dispute undergoes administrative scrutiny. • For Healthcare Staff: Government doctors and clinical personnel face increased disciplinary exposure and scrutiny over their workplace conduct during duty hours. Health workers must maintain professional decorum to prevent formal administrative notices and adverse service records. • For Hospital Administration: Healthcare facilities are likely to deploy stricter documentation protocols and incident recording to manage internal insubordination. Facility leadership will face higher expectations to resolve staff disputes promptly before they impede public services. Why this happened The dispute erupted after a senior medical officer allegedly barged into the facility in-charge's office in an intoxicated condition and engaged in aggressive misbehaviour. • Direct Trigger: Senior Medical Officer Dr. Ashok Kumar Nooniya abruptly entered the office of facility in-charge Dr. Pradeep Sharma without notice and allegedly engaged in rude and disruptive conduct. His speech and mannerisms indicated heavy alcohol intoxication while on official duty. • Underlying Workplace Friction: According to Dr. Sharma, the accused physician had repeatedly received verbal warnings regarding his disruptive conduct and professional work ethic in previous months. The failure to heed these informal admonitions exacerbated long-simmering friction between the doctors. • Circulation of Digital Footage: The altercation was captured on video and circulated on social media platforms, transforming an internal administrative grievance into a public controversy. The viral spread of the clip compelled hospital leadership to initiate formal written proceedings. • Next Administrative Steps: A 48-hour formal notice was issued demanding a written explanation from Dr. Nooniya. If the response is deemed unsatisfactory, the case will be escalated to senior health department authorities for departmental inquiry and disciplinary proceedings. Questions & Answers 1. Which hospital is at the centre of this controversy? The incident occurred at the Community Health Centre located in Mandrella town of Jhunjhunu district, Rajasthan. 2. Which senior physician has been issued a formal notice? Senior Medical Officer Dr. Ashok Kumar Nooniya has been served the official show-cause notice. 3. What specific charges have been levelled against Dr. Nooniya? He is accused of entering the in-charge room unannounced, misbehaving, disrupting order, and creating a ruckus under heavy alcohol intoxication. 4. Who issued the administrative notice? The notice was issued by Dr. Pradeep Sharma, the medical officer in charge of Mandrella Community Health Centre. 5. What deadline has been set for submitting the explanation? Dr. Nooniya has been given a period of two days (48 hours) to submit his written response to the charges. 6. What consequences follow if the response is unsatisfactory? If the explanation is not provided within 48 hours or is found unsatisfactory, a recommendation for strict departmental disciplinary action will be forwarded to higher authorities. https://trendkia.com/en/rajasthan/jhunjhunu-ke-mandrella-aspatala-men-doktaron-ke-bicha-bhari-vivada-nashe-men-hngame-ke-aropa-para-varishtha-chikitsaka-ko-mila-not-39764 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.