Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice Transfer Demand Escalates as Jodhpur Advocates Association April 25 Letter Surfaces

Amid ongoing tension at the Rajasthan High Court, a previously sent letter from the Jodhpur Advocates Association has surfaced, revealing that demands for the transfer of Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma were formally raised months ago.

The ongoing institutional friction at the Rajasthan High Court involving Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma has taken a significant legal turn following the emergence of prior official correspondence. Months before allegations raised by Supreme Court Justice Sandeep Mehta became public, the Rajasthan High Court Advocates Association in Jodhpur had officially approached the Chief Justice of India demanding the transfer of the Acting Chief Justice. The association urged the top court to appoint a permanent Chief Justice in Rajasthan, citing a breakdown of cordial relations between the Bar and the Bench under the prevailing administrative setup.

Lack of Communication and Call for Permanent Chief Justice
The letter was formally dispatched on April 25 by Ranjeet Joshi, President of the Rajasthan High Court Advocates Association, Jodhpur, to the then Chief Justice of India Surya Kant. The primary emphasis of the representation was the urgent appointment of a permanent Chief Justice to restore harmony and effective coordination within the court. The advocate body highlighted a growing communication gap between practitioners and the court administration, noting that the absence of constructive dialogue had repeatedly generated friction and misunderstanding during daily proceedings.

Infra Deficit and 10x10 Feet Tin Shed Workspace Constraints
In addition to administrative governance issues, the advocates' body detailed severe deficiencies in basic infrastructure allocated to legal practitioners. The representation pointed out that requests for essential working spaces and small chambers had remained unaddressed for extended periods. It specifically highlighted instances where lawyers were forced to operate out of cramped 10x10 feet tin sheds. The association stressed that the lack of administrative cooperation regarding basic working conditions had fueled widespread dissatisfaction among advocates, directly harming the working relationship between lawyers and judges.

Transfer Request and Alignment with Supreme Court Justice Demands
To preserve the institution's dignity and ensure smooth judicial functioning, the association requested the Chief Justice of India to consider transferring Acting Chief Justice Justice S. P. Sharma to a High Court outside Rajasthan. This April letter has acquired fresh significance following recent action by Supreme Court Justice Sandeep Mehta, who sent three separate letters earlier this month to the Chief Justice of India and Collegium members. Justice Mehta alleged misuse of powers and raised concerns regarding integrity against Justice Sharma based on multiple complaints, demanding his immediate reassignment outside the state.

Pre-existing Strain in Bar-Bench Relations Exposed
The disclosure of the April representation confirms that dissatisfaction regarding court administration and Bar-Bench harmony in Rajasthan predated the recent representations made by Justice Sandeep Mehta. The formal record establishes that advocates had systematically communicated their grievances to the highest judicial authority months ago. As administrative scrutiny intensifies, attention remains focused on how the Supreme Court Collegium addresses the structural and administrative challenges facing the Rajasthan High Court.

What this means for you
This development directly impacts judicial operations and court proceedings for advocates and litigants in Rajasthan.

• In Rajasthan: The atmosphere at the Jodhpur and Jaipur benches may experience tension, potentially affecting the pace of hearing cases if friction between the Bar and Bench persists.
• Across India: It highlights institutional mechanisms within the High Courts, potentially accelerating Supreme Court Collegium decisions regarding permanent appointments and administrative grievance resolution.

Questions & Answers

1. When did the Jodhpur Advocates Association send the letter to the Chief Justice of India?
Association President Ranjeet Joshi sent the representation on April 25 to the then Chief Justice of India Surya Kant.

2. What were the primary demands made in the April letter?
The association demanded the appointment of a permanent Chief Justice and the transfer of Acting Chief Justice S. P. Sharma outside Rajasthan.

3. What infrastructure issues were highlighted in the representation?
The letter cited a lack of proper chambers and noted that advocates were forced to work out of cramped 10x10 feet tin sheds.

4. What actions did Supreme Court Justice Sandeep Mehta take recently?
Justice Sandeep Mehta sent three separate letters to the Chief Justice of India and Collegium members alleging misuse of powers and requesting Justice Sharma's transfer.

https://trendkia.com/en/rajasthan/rajasthan-high-court-ke-karyavahaka-mukhya-nyayadhisha-ke-khilapha-jodhpur-advocates-association-ka-25-apraila-ka-patra-samane-ane-23013
TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.