# BJP Hits Out at Telangana Chief Minister over Ram and Shiva Remarks, Accuses Congress of Dividing Society > BJP spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi strongly criticized Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy for dividing deities, alleging that Congress is actively fragmenting Indian society along religious, regional, and social lines. **Type:** article · **Category:** Telangana · **Published:** 2026-09-30 · **Source:** TrendKia **Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/telangana/telangana-chief-minister-ke-bayana-para-bjp-ka-tikha-hamala-devataon-aura-samaja-ko-bantane-ka-lagaya-aropa-40320 · **Language:** English **Tags:** Sudhanshu Trivedi, Revanth Reddy, Rahul Gandhi, BJP, Congress, Telangana, Politics The Bharatiya Janata Party has strongly condemned remarks made by Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy regarding Lord Ram and Lord Shiva. Addressing a press conference in New Delhi on Wednesday, BJP spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi launched a scathing attack on the Congress party, accusing it of employing all its strength to divide Hindu society. He asserted that the political rhetoric of the opposition has now degraded to the point of attempting to split even revered deities. ## Questions Over Oath and Ideological Stand Targeting Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, the BJP spokesperson referred to him as an atheist and drew a contrast between his oath-taking ceremonies. Trivedi highlighted that while Rahul Gandhi took his oath in the name of God following the 2014 general elections, he opted not to take the oath in God's name after the 2024 elections, choosing instead to take it in English. Moving forward, the BJP spokesperson referenced earlier remarks made by Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy during the Jubilee Hills by-election campaign. According to Trivedi, Reddy had proclaimed that Congress means Muslims and Muslims mean Congress, which he described as revealing the core mindset of the party. ## Allegations of a North-South Divide Sudhanshu Trivedi claimed that the Congress is systematically seeking to divide society along regional geographical lines, specifically between North and South India. To substantiate his point, he cited several previous remarks made by prominent party leaders. He highlighted a statement by Karnataka leader DK Suresh regarding tax revenues, where Suresh remarked that the South pays higher taxes while the North pays less. Trivedi also brought up an earlier comment by P. Chidambaram, who suggested that the South would have progressed much further had it not been for North India. Furthermore, Trivedi criticized Revanth Reddy for invoking the Aryan and Dravidian theories by claiming 'we are Dravidians and they are Aryans.' Dismissing this assertion entirely, Trivedi called it a foolish and baseless concept that has already been discredited across the world. He advised that the Telangana Chief Minister ought to read the works of scholars and leaders from his own party, specifically naming Sampurnanand and Kanaiyalal Maneklal Munshi. ## Divisions Across Regions, Castes, and Gender Broadening the scope of his criticism, the BJP spokesperson pointed out that Revanth Reddy had previously stirred controversy by making contentious statements regarding the DNA of Bihar and Telangana. Trivedi accused the Congress of actively working to divide regions, languages, and castes across the country to serve narrow political goals. The critique also touched upon the 'smash patriarchy' slogan associated with Rahul Gandhi. Trivedi alleged that the party seeks to create conflict between men and women as well, but applies selective standards. He argued that the demand to smash patriarchy is vocalized only concerning Hindu society, whereas silence follows when religious leaders like the Grand Mufti of Kerala state that women ought to be kept like necklaces locked inside a vault. ## Sharp Rebuke on the Standards of Discourse Concluding his press briefing, Sudhanshu Trivedi expressed deep concern that political rhetoric has reached the extreme of attempting to categorize and separate Hindu gods based on economic strata. Describing this approach as one of the lowest points in Indian democratic politics, he summarized his criticism by remarking that while the British partitioned the land, current politics partitions every cultural fabric merely to secure the seat of power. ## What this means for you This political controversy could sharpen the national debate surrounding religion, regional identities, and electoral discourse. - **Across India:** Escalating arguments between national parties over religious symbols place sensitive cultural matters directly at the center of public attention. Citizens will likely scrutinize party ideologies more closely ahead of upcoming electoral contests. - **In Telangana:** Aggressive opposition pushback against the Chief Minister's remarks will likely heat up the state political landscape. Residents will observe how the state leadership balances governance duties against persistent ideological controversies. - **On political discourse:** Public scrutiny over statements that categorize religious deities based on wealth or social class will likely increase. Voters will demand higher accountability and careful framing from senior political figures addressing cultural topics. - **On social cohesion:** Renewed national debates around north-south distinctions and regional identities prompt wider discussions on inter-state cooperation. This reinforces the public demand for inclusive language that preserves social harmony across state borders. ## Why this happened This political confrontation emerged following remarks by Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy classifying Lord Ram as a deity of the rich and Lord Shiva as a deity of the poor. The BJP responded by using a national press platform to challenge what it characterized as a broader pattern of social division by the Congress. - **Immediate trigger:** Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy made a statement categorizing deities along socio-economic lines. The BJP viewed this characterization as unacceptable and politically motivated, triggering a sharp counter-offensive. - **Regional friction points:** Past remarks by southern Congress leaders regarding tax distribution between North and South India contributed to the escalation. The BJP grouped these prior statements together to argue that the party actively promotes regional divides. - **Ideological contrast:** Scrutiny over Rahul Gandhi's parliamentary oath formulation and past statements on DNA, caste, and patriarchy formed the foundation of the BJP's ideological critique. The party framed these instances as evidence of selective and hypocritical political posturing. - **Next developments:** Disagreements over faith-based rhetoric and regional identity politics are expected to intensify between both national parties. Both camps will likely continue to challenge each other's cultural and social credentials in future debates. ## Questions & Answers ### 1. Which remark by Revanth Reddy drew sharp criticism from the BJP? The BJP objected to Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy's statement describing Ram as the god of the rich and Shiva as the god of the poor. ### 2. What did Sudhanshu Trivedi say regarding Rahul Gandhi's parliamentary oath? He pointed out that Rahul Gandhi took his oath in the name of God in 2014, but did not take it in God's name in 2024, choosing English instead. ### 3. Which Congress leaders were cited regarding North-South regional rhetoric? Sudhanshu Trivedi referenced tax-related comments by DK Suresh of Karnataka and a past statement by P. Chidambaram. ### 4. How did the BJP respond to the Aryan and Dravidian theory mentioned by Reddy? Sudhanshu Trivedi called it a foolish and baseless theory that has been thoroughly discredited across the globe. ### 5. Which historical figures did Trivedi suggest Revanth Reddy should read? He advised the Telangana Chief Minister to read Congress's own historical figures, Sampurnanand and Kanaiyalal Maneklal Munshi. ### 6. What point did the BJP spokesperson make concerning gender issues? He argued that slogans about smashing patriarchy are selectively applied to Hindu society while silence is maintained on remarks by other religious heads. --- _TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._