# Ayodhya Donation Theft: SIT Report May Land Within Two Days, Questions Mount Over Tinnu Yadav's Role

> The Special Investigation Team probing the theft of offerings at Ayodhya's Ram Mandir is expected to submit its report within 24 to 48 hours, with the findings raising questions over Tinnu Yadav's role and lapses at the temple trust.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Uttar Pradesh · **Published:** 2026-07-15 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/uttar-pradesh/ayodhya-charhava-chori-do-dina-men-samane-a-sakati-hai-sit-ki-jancha-riporta-tinnu-yadav-ki-bhumika-para-ghire-savala-7914 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Ram Mandir donation theft, SIT investigation report, Tinnu Yadav, Ayodhya Ram Mandir, temple trust negligence, donation scam

The Special Investigation Team, or SIT, looking into the theft of donations at Ayodhya's Ram Mandir has all but finished drafting its report. Sources say the team wrapped up finalising its conclusions and recommendations as of last night, and once the remaining formalities are cleared, the report is expected to reach the concerned authority within the next 24 to 48 hours.

## Deadline Runs Out Wednesday
The window given to the SIT to complete its probe ends on Wednesday, and so far no call has been made to extend the team's tenure. That is why it is being assumed the report will be filed within the original deadline rather than the investigation dragging on further.

## Culprits And Negligent Officials Marked Separately
According to sources, the report draws a clear line between two sets of people, those directly involved in stealing the offerings and those at the administrative level who were careless in their duties. The probe has also found that the contract between the temple trust and the bank was not implemented following the proper process, and this lapse has been flagged as one of the biggest reasons the theft was possible in the first place.

## An Attempt To Hush Up The Theft
The report is also said to note that there was an attempt to suppress news of the theft out of concern that it would damage the temple trust's image. Sources say that even after the theft came to light, the necessary action was not taken in time, and that delay only made the matter worse.

## Tinnu Yadav's Role Under The Scanner
The SIT has also raised questions over Tinnu Yadav's role in its investigation. Per the report, excessive reliance on a single individual, combined with gaps in the monitoring system, compromised the security of the offerings. That is precisely why the stolen amount was recovered not just from other accused but from Tinnu Yadav as well.

All eyes are now on the SIT's final report. It is expected that once it is out, the process of taking further action against the guilty and fixing administrative accountability will pick up pace.

## What this means for you
- **Across India:** The case is likely to trigger closer scrutiny of how temples and religious trusts across the country handle and monitor donations, potentially tightening banking and security protocols.
- **In Ayodhya and Uttar Pradesh:** Pressure will grow on the local administration and temple management to fix accountability and improve security for the donations of devotees visiting the Ram Mandir.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. When is the SIT report on the Ram Mandir donation theft case expected?
Sources say the report is likely to be handed over to the concerned authority within the next 24 to 48 hours.

### 2. How much time was the SIT given to complete its probe?
The SIT's given time ends on Wednesday, and no decision has yet been made to extend its tenure.

### 3. What has the report identified as the biggest reason for the theft?
The contract between the temple trust and the bank was not implemented following the proper process, which has been flagged as a major cause of the theft.

### 4. What questions have been raised over Tinnu Yadav's role?
The report says excessive reliance on one individual and gaps in monitoring compromised security, and the stolen amount was recovered from Tinnu Yadav as well as other accused.

### 5. Was there an attempt to cover up the theft?
Sources say the incident was allegedly suppressed out of fear it would damage the temple trust's image, and timely action was not taken.

### 6. Whose responsibility has the report fixed?
The report separately identifies those directly involved in the theft and those responsible for administrative negligence.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._