# Meerut Court Convicts Wife and Lover for Strangling Husband and Planting Snake to Fake Bite

> A court in Meerut has convicted Ravita and her paramour Amardeep for murdering her husband Amit Kashyap by strangulation and planting a defanged snake under his body to disguise the crime.

**Type:** article · **Category:** Uttar Pradesh · **Published:** 2026-10-07 · **Source:** TrendKia
**Canonical:** https://trendkia.com/en/uttar-pradesh/meerut-men-pati-ka-gala-ghontakara-shava-ke-niche-rakha-sanpa-adalata-ne-patni-aura-usake-premi-ko-thaharaya-hatya-ka-doshi-44624 · **Language:** English
**Tags:** Meerut murder case, Amit Kashyap murder, Meerut court conviction, Uttar Pradesh crime, fake snakebite plot, Ravita and Amardeep

A local court in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, has convicted a woman and her paramour for plotting and executing the cold-blooded murder of her husband, concluding trial proceedings that unravelled a bizarre scheme to stage the killing as a snakebite. The convicts had smothered the victim to death inside his residence and subsequently slipped a snake beneath his mattress to mislead investigators and relatives into believing the demise was accidental. Relying on medical testimony and the findings of the post-mortem examination, the court held both individuals guilty, scheduling the quantum of sentence for October 16, 2026.

## Body Discovered in Bed with Snake Trapped Underneath
The incident dates back to April 12, 2025, when Amit Kashyap was discovered dead under highly suspicious circumstances inside his home in Meerut. Family members who reached the cot noticed a snake lying pinned beneath the bedsheet right under his motionless body. The scene had been meticulously set up to convey the immediate impression that the sleeping man had been fatally bitten by a venomous reptile. Upon receiving distress calls, local police officers arrived at the premises, safely secured the reptile inside a container, and dispatched the remains for a statutory post-mortem examination.

However, the physical circumstances at the crime scene raised immediate red flags among the victim's kin. Typically, a wild serpent flees immediately after striking, yet in this instance, the creature remained stuck underneath the bedding without attempting to slither away. These oddities prompted investigators to treat the death with deep skepticism right from the outset.

## Autopsy Shatters Snakebite Theory, Shifting Probe to Murder
The forensic post-mortem report shattered the staged narrative completely. Medical experts concluded that Amit had not succumbed to snake venom or toxin-induced failure; instead, his windpipe had been crushed and he had died of asphyxiation caused by deliberate strangulation. The conclusive finding of manual strangling transformed what was initially presented as an unfortunate reptile attack into an active homicide investigation. The revelation sent shockwaves throughout the village as detectives began probing the immediate household.

## Illicit Affair and a Non-Venomous Snake Procured for One Thousand Rupees
Investigating officers soon uncovered a clandestine domestic motive. Amit and his neighbour, Amardeep, both worked together laying floor tiles and shared close familiarity. Over time, Amit's wife, Ravita, developed an illicit romantic relationship with Amardeep, who visited the house regularly during Amit's absence. The victim's mother had grown suspicious of their interactions and had previously spotted the two together under questionable circumstances.

Viewing Amit as an obstacle to their relationship, Ravita and Amardeep conspired to eliminate him without raising suspicion. To execute the deception, they approached snake charmers under the pretext of requiring a serpent for religious rituals. For a sum of 1,000 rupees, they procured a defanged, non-venomous snake. On the night of the crime, the duo strangled Amit until he stopped breathing, placed the purchased snake beneath his body under the covers, and waited for the morning discovery to pass off the killing as an accidental bite. During the investigation, police traced the snake charmer, recorded his statement, and enlisted him as a key state prosecution witness.

## Lengthy Trial Concludes in Court 12 with Sentence Due October 16
The murder trial was conducted before the Additional District Judge Court 12 (designated as the court of CJM 12). The prosecution presented comprehensive evidence linking both accused to criminal conspiracy, premeditated murder, and tampering with evidence through the fabrication of a snakebite scene. Following arguments from both the defence and prosecution, the court formally declared Ravita and Amardeep guilty of Amit's murder. Formal pronouncement of the sentence has been reserved for October 16.

## Victim's Mother Demands Capital Punishment
Reacting to the conviction verdict, the victim's grieving mother, Munesh, broke down in tears outside the courtroom and pleaded for capital punishment. She stated that while the conviction brings temporary solace, true justice for her son would only be served when both the murderous wife and her paramour are sent to the gallows. Munesh affirmed her resolve to pursue the case through higher appellate courts if necessary to ensure that the culprits receive the maximum penalty permissible under law.

## What this means for you
This judicial ruling highlights how modern forensic post-mortems can unravel elaborate criminal conspiracies designed to masquerade as accidental fatalities.

- **Across India:** The conviction reinforces the critical reliance of criminal courts on medical jurisprudence and forensic evidence over staged crime scenes. It sends an unequivocal warning that deceptive alibis cannot withstand detailed scientific examination.
- **In Uttar Pradesh:** The Meerut administration and judiciary demonstrated that persistent prosecution can bring domestic conspiracies to account without undue delay. Local residents are now closely watching the upcoming October 16 sentencing hearing.
- **For ordinary families:** In any instance of an unexplained or suspicious domestic demise, demanding a comprehensive autopsy is paramount. Objective forensic reports remain the most reliable safeguard against foul play being covered up as natural tragedy.
- **On legal accountability:** Intermediaries who facilitate criminal acts, such as the unauthorised supply of captive wildlife, inevitably face police scrutiny. Turning the supplier into an official state witness illustrates the methodology used to dismantle joint criminal liability.

## Why this happened
The crime stemmed from an illicit extramarital liaison between the victim's wife and his co-worker neighbour, followed by a premeditated plot to conceal the murder behind an accidental wildlife encounter.

- **Extramarital affair:** Amit and Amardeep worked together laying floor tiles and resided in the same neighbourhood. Amardeep's frequent household visits led to a secret relationship with Ravita, which had already drawn suspicion from Amit's mother.
- **Premeditated staging:** Desiring to remove Amit permanently, the duo plotted to strangle him and mask the murder as an untoward snakebite incident. They paid 1,000 rupees to a snake charmer under a religious pretext to obtain a harmless snake to stage the scene.
- **Forensic unravelling:** The unusual behaviour of the snake remaining pinned beneath the victim raised initial suspicions among family members. The subsequent post-mortem report confirming asphyxiation by strangulation completely shattered the cover-up, exposing the homicide.

## Questions & Answers

### 1. Who has been convicted in this Meerut murder case?
The court has convicted the victim Amit Kashyap's wife Ravita and her paramour Amardeep for murder.

### 2. What was the actual cause of Amit's death?
The autopsy confirmed that Amit died of asphyxiation caused by strangulation, rather than snake venom.

### 3. Why was a snake planted at the crime scene?
The accused placed the snake under his body to disguise the homicide as an accidental fatal snakebite.

### 4. Where and for how much did the accused acquire the snake?
They purchased a defanged snake from a snake charmer for 1,000 rupees under the pretext of a religious ceremony.

### 5. When will the quantum of punishment be pronounced?
The Meerut court has scheduled the sentencing hearing for October 16, 2026.

### 6. What sentence is the victim's family demanding?
The victim's mother has demanded capital punishment for both convicted individuals.

---
_TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.. Machine-readable view; canonical HTML at the URL above._