Supreme Court Issues Notice on Plea Challenging Bail of Convicts in Raju Pal Murder Case as CBI Backs Cancellation The Supreme Court has issued notices to life convicts Abid Pradhan and Javed following a petition by MLA Pooja Pal seeking the revocation of their bail in the 2005 Raju Pal murder case, with the CBI backing the plea. The Supreme Court has taken up a petition challenging the bail granted to two life convicts in the high profile 2005 Raju Pal murder case, issuing formal notices to the individuals involved. During the hearing, the Central Bureau of Investigation aligned itself with the petitioner, demanding that the release of both convicts be revoked due to serious procedural and factual non-disclosures. Supreme Court Notice and CBI Support The legal freedom granted to life term convicts Abid Pradhan and Javed in the nearly two decade old murder case has come under heavy judicial scrutiny. MLA Pooja Pal, the wife of the deceased lawmaker Raju Pal, moved the apex court seeking the immediate cancellation of their bail. Taking up the plea, the top court issued notices to both convicts, directing them to submit their responses within three weeks. The matter has been scheduled for its next hearing after three weeks. Significantly, the CBI counsel present during the proceedings fully backed Pooja Pal's petition, arguing before the bench that their bail should be cancelled. Allegations of Suppressing Criminal Antecedents Presenting arguments on behalf of Pooja Pal, the advocate highlighted the brutal nature of the January 2005 attack in Prayagraj, where Raju Pal and two other individuals were shot dead in broad daylight. The legal counsel informed the court that the perpetrators deployed sophisticated firepower, including AK-47 assault rifles, during the execution of the crime. The petition specifically contends that Abid Pradhan and Javed obtained bail by concealing their extensive criminal record and suppressing crucial evidentiary details from the court, forming the primary legal ground for seeking their return to custody. The 2005 Shootout and Charges Against the Atiq Gang The roots of the case trace back to January 2005, when then BSP MLA Raju Pal was gunned down in Prayagraj. Following the incident, his wife Pooja Pal lodged a formal criminal complaint at the Dhoomanganj police station. The FIR named then Member of Parliament Atiq Ahmed and his brother Ashraf, also known as Khalid Azim, alongside several associates as key conspirators. Upon completing its preliminary probe, the police filed charges on April 6, 2005, initiating prosecution against Atiq Ahmed, Ashraf, and multiple co-accused. Assassination of Witness Umesh Pal and Subsequent Developments The repercussions of the murder resonated for years, ultimately targeting key eyewitness Umesh Pal. In February 2023, Umesh Pal was ambushed right outside his residence in the Dhoomanganj area with crude bombs and gunfire. The assault resulted in the deaths of Umesh Pal and his two assigned police security guards, with law enforcement placing responsibility once again on Atiq Ahmed and his syndicate. Subsequently, in April 2023, primary accused Atiq Ahmed and his brother Ashraf were shot dead at point-blank range while in police custody in Prayagraj, as assailants disguised as media personnel opened fire while the duo spoke to reporters. What this means for you Across India: The apex court's scrutiny over bail granted to life term convicts emphasizes transparency and adherence to strict judicial standards across the country. In Uttar Pradesh: Ongoing legal accountability in long standing high profile cases reinforces public faith in law enforcement and the justice system. Questions & Answers 1. What action has the Supreme Court taken in the Raju Pal murder case? The court issued formal notices to life convicts Abid Pradhan and Javed, directing them to file their responses within three weeks on a plea seeking bail cancellation. 2. Who filed the petition in the Supreme Court? MLA Pooja Pal, the wife of the deceased lawmaker Raju Pal, filed the petition in the top court seeking the revocation of bail granted to the two convicts. 3. What stance did the CBI take during the court hearing? The investigating agency CBI supported Pooja Pal's petition in court and advocated for the cancellation of bail granted to the convicts. 4. What specific allegations were made against the bail granted to the convicts? The petition alleged that convicts Abid Pradhan and Javed obtained bail by suppressing their criminal background and concealing vital facts from the court. 5. When and how did the Raju Pal murder take place? In January 2005, then BSP MLA Raju Pal and two others were shot dead in broad daylight in Prayagraj using high caliber weapons such as AK-47 rifles. 6. What happened to Umesh Pal, the key witness in the case? In February 2023, key witness Umesh Pal and his two police security guards were killed in a crude bomb and shooting attack outside his home in Dhoomanganj. https://trendkia.com/en/uttar-pradesh/pooja-pal-ki-yachika-para-supreme-court-sakhta-raju-pal-mardara-kesa-ke-do-doshiyon-ko-notisa-jari-kara-tina-haphte-men-javaba-man-18882 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.