Supreme Court Puts Ram Mandir Donation Embezzlement Plea on Hold Until July, Rejects Urgent Hearing The Supreme Court declined to urgently hear a PIL demanding a CBI investigation into alleged embezzlement of Ram Mandir donations in Ayodhya, directing that the case be listed for hearing in the week of July 12-17 after the summer recess. A public interest litigation seeking a CBI probe into alleged embezzlement and financial irregularities involving Ram Mandir donations in Ayodhya was filed in the Supreme Court on Monday, but the bench declined to hear it on an urgent basis. The court made clear that the case would go through normal scheduling, and directed that it be listed for consideration in the week of July 12-17, once the court resumes after its summer recess. The Court's Sharp Remarks During the Hearing When the petition came up before the bench of Justice MM Sundresh and Justice Sheel Nagu, the judges reacted with noticeable displeasure toward the demand for an immediate hearing. The bench posed a direct question to the petitioners: what exactly is the urgency here? It went further, asking whether the sky would collapse if the hearing were deferred until after the summer vacation. The court's position was firm. It said that once regular court functioning resumes after the break, the matter will be heard in an orderly manner following established procedure. The bench rejected the request for urgent listing outright. Who Filed the PIL and What They Demanded The public interest litigation was filed by two lawyers. The petition alleged that funds donated to the Ram Mandir had been misappropriated and demanded a CBI investigation conducted under judicial oversight. During the short hearing, the petitioners made a pointed argument for why the CBI must be brought in: the investigation currently being conducted by the Uttar Pradesh Police, they said, cannot be relied upon. The reason they cited was that important evidence in the case is not being properly secured and preserved, which they argued puts the integrity of the investigation at risk. State of the Police Investigation The petition was filed while an active police investigation into the alleged donation theft is already ongoing. In total, eight people have been arrested in connection with the case thus far. Police have already recorded the statement of Champat Rai, who served as the former General Secretary of the Shri Ram Janmbhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. Investigators have indicated that the statements of trustee Anil Mishra, along with those of other senior officials of the Trust, can also be recorded if the investigation requires it. Notably, Champat Rai had resigned from his position in the Trust amid this unfolding controversy. How the Donation Theft Controversy Began The entire episode came to light when allegations surfaced that cash was being stolen from the donation boxes installed inside the Ram Mandir. These boxes receive offerings from large numbers of devotees who visit the temple every day. Following a formal complaint, investigators examined CCTV footage recorded inside the temple premises. The recordings proved revealing, laying out the entire picture of how the theft had been carried out. On the strength of this evidence, the Trust lodged a first information report with the police. Based on the FIR, several employees whose job was to count and tally the offerings at the temple were taken into custody, subjected to questioning, and subsequently placed under formal arrest. What this means for you • Across India: The Supreme Court deferring the hearing until at least July means those seeking swift justice in the Ram Mandir donation embezzlement case will have to wait longer for any outcome. • In Ayodhya: Devotees who contributed to the Ram Mandir will need to wait for both the police investigation and the court proceedings to run their course before gaining clarity on how their donations were managed. Questions & Answers 1. Why did the Supreme Court refuse an urgent hearing in the Ram Mandir donation theft case? The Supreme Court said there was no urgency in the matter and it would be heard through regular procedure. The bench remarked that waiting until after the summer vacation would not cause any catastrophe. 2. When will the case next be heard? The Supreme Court directed that the petition be listed in the week of July 12-17, after the court reopens from its summer recess. 3. What did the public interest litigation demand? The PIL, filed by two lawyers, demanded a CBI investigation into the alleged misappropriation of donations collected for the Ram Mandir. 4. Why did the petitioners object to the Uttar Pradesh Police investigation? The petitioners argued that the UP Police investigation could not be trusted because key pieces of evidence in the case were not being properly preserved. 5. How many people have been arrested in the Ram Mandir donation theft case? Eight people have been arrested in connection with the case so far. 6. What is Champat Rai's connection to this case? Champat Rai is the former General Secretary of the Shri Ram Janmbhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. Police recorded his statement, and he had resigned from the Trust amid the controversy. 7. How did the Ram Mandir donation theft controversy come to light? Allegations surfaced that cash was being stolen from the temple's donation boxes. CCTV footage confirmed the theft, following which the Trust filed an FIR and some employees responsible for counting offerings were subsequently arrested. https://trendkia.com/en/uttar-pradesh/ram-mandir-dana-ghotale-para-supreme-court-ne-phauri-sunavai-se-mana-kiya-julai-men-hogi-agali-tarikha-3598 TrendKia — Har trend, sabse pehle.